At least school taxes are payback for when we were educated with public dollars. Furthermore, it is questionable if taxpayers should be forced to fund library materials they find objectionable. Just as many conservatives objected to tax supported art such as Robert Mapplethorpe’s photography, others may object to paying for pornographic westerns, Rush Limbaugh books or Left Behind recordings with their tax dollars. In a private library, people can choose whose ideas to support with their money.
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
It’s always amazing to me
It’s always amazing to me that people who don’t use libraries think no one uses libraries.
Understand Public Libraries and then Support Them
I wish to share with you some insight, some words presented from the perspective of one who works daily and tirelessly for the public and the idea of a public library.
Firstly, please understand public libraries contribute significantly to society, offering everyone the opportunity to advance their knowledge through publicly available materials.
More educated people mean a better prepared, more literate, more functional, and more capable society.
Is this not what everyone should want?
Those who work in public libraries know well how we try and often succeed to bridge the gaps between the haves and the have-nots.
School districts often work in conjunction with public libraries, particularly as school libraries are often overwhelmingly under-funded, understaffed, and usually have few copies of reading materials for students to use.
Public libraries happily inherit those researcher’s needs and work with other local libraries to interlibrary loan materials, ensuring at any moment, that we are filling the needs of those students to the best of our abilities.
Many people do not know this happens, and this is one of those examples that can demonstrate how your local public library collaborates with other public libraries to provide informational coverage across communities.
Once you understand that point, you realize that any diminishing of any public library in that scheme not only threatens the immediate community but also the surrounding communities in terms of cooperative material and resource sharing.
More than that, we offer research assistance to students, as they often cannot receive such service at their schools due to the smallness and limited resources of school libraries.
To remove or endanger public libraries through any alternative funding scheme would jeopardize our ability to help those students, among others in our respective communities.
The results of that — scholastically, socially, economically, emotionally — would be tragic for students, parents, and community members.
Your public library is more than a building with books it in, more than a place where people can check out occasionally controversial or sensationalized reading materials that frankly receive more hype than they are worth.
If you truly take issue with the collection development decisions of your public library, there are often formal means by which you can approach its board and/or challenge the inclusion of such materials in that collection by filling out a simple form possibly available at your library.
As public libraries are more than books, we are certainly more than tax dollars.
At a time when the economy presents new difficulties and challenges, it is public libraries that can and will help society to continue moving forward, despite any negative fiscal conditions, because our institutions do not function according to profit-based missions.
We exist for the common person, for the community, their intellectual well-being.
Do away with public libraries or threaten to diminish them in any way, and you will succeed in robbing communities of their developmental potentials and ultimately worsen economic and social conditions.
Just because you might not use your public library does not erase the fact that hundreds of thousands of individuals, every day in America and throughout the world, rely on such public institutions as a means of maintaining a realistic hope of contributing to society as a productive and informed member.
Would anyone seriously rather these people not have access to such life-changing information?
Does anyone seriously want these people to face the possibility of not being able to further their intelligence?
Would anyone seriously prefer these people to become burdens on their communities, be robbed of their potentials or their rights to free access to information?
As we know, not everyone can afford the escalating costs of a college education. With that in mind, let us remember that public libraries are, for all intents and purposes, often considered the “universities of the people,” by and for and of them.
It is not far-fetched to say public libraries help preserve and promote democracy. We do.
Perhaps this is as good a time as any for public library advocates speak out against those who doubt our worth or question our existence or attempt to denigrate our missions and offerings through poor and sensationalized examples of certain reading materials that are easy targets.
By and large, the bulk of public library collections exist according to collection development plans which are coordinated and reviewed with librarians who choose to add materials to their collections primarily based on a community’s needs and demands.
And this is done in the face of tight budgets. No such decisions are easy, especially as it becomes even more apparent we have to educate people as to the social and economic worth of public library institutions.
We have much work to do, so let us band together and remind the world what it is that public libraries stand for, what we have achieved, what we continue to contribute in terms of public service and educational opportunities to society, what positive impacts we have had throughout our collective histories, among so many other amazing achievements.
Public libraries have been a consistently wise investment, better than any stocks you might own at the moment, because the dividends libraries pay are decidedly innumerable and far-reaching and will outlast any company you might financially invest in.
“Priceless,” as they say in the television commercials.
This is not merely about money but about human lives, the worth we assign to preserving dreams of advancement for others, how much of a price we are willing to put on giving the have-nots viable options and opportunities to become more than just functional members of their society but also leaders and supporters of educational efforts and positive, community-uplifting endeavors.
In return for your tax dollars, a public library invests directly in your community. This is true whether you use it or not.
And this is not merely about information: public libraries offer what the Internet cannot possibly provide in terms of community enrichment and free access to information of all kinds and in all formats.
We know some of you can and prefer to “Google it,” but Google is not research. Let me repeat that: Google is not research.
Any search engine company is, for all its expansive efforts and intentions, essentially just a search engine, but more importantly, in this conversation, a business, and one that does not exist to serve your specific community’s needs but rather the demands of its shareholders.
Public libraries, on the other hand, are non-profit, oriented to the betterment of their designated service populations, and often far better suited to serve the local information needs of its communities because we take the time and dedicate our limited resources to meeting the immediate needs of our communities.
In other words, if you somehow believe access to the Internet and a search engine makes the need for a public library obsolete, you are sadly mistaken: we offer more than just information.
That said, we often offer better information and research tools that do not exist on the Internet. Even some of the smallest libraries offer specialized databases, many of which you can access from home, that will do wonders for your research.
Surprisingly, many people do not know that, yet that is one example of how public libraries have extended their informational reach to provide quality research services to their communities.
Now, just imagine what more we could do if people took the time to appreciate what public libraries stood for and achieved on a day to day basis.
Our fight is the the fight for every person’s right to read, right to access information in an objective atmosphere, a right to learn, a right to read for enlightenment or enjoyment.
Our fight is for you.
Yes, you.
And in a world where are increasing desires and technologies to control information, your future, and your very minds, your public library remains one of your closest allies.
Commercial search engines cannot and will not fight for you as an individual or your community: their sole missions are to produce profits, increase sales and ad-clicks.
In this world where information IS power, public libraries directly empower those who take advantage of that library’s offerings.
To those who don’t take advantage of their public libraries: you do not know what you are missing!
Please visit your library. Get to know your local librarians. They have done so much for your community, more than you probably will ever know!
Nevertheless, we in the library community are eager to meet and serve our community members and help them find the information they need and get on the road to success.
This truly is our mission, we who are sworn to uphold the sacred ideals of public librarianship: we want to help, and we will continue to help all those in need.
Some libraries are so severely underfunded or unsupported that they have lost their abilities to effectively serve their communities. This certainly must be viewed as one of our modern tragedies.
We hope you would agree that those who need our help deserve to be helped, and we hope you understand where we are coming from.
Please support public libraries. In doing so, you will be supporting the future of your community — and not just yours but the future of all those who perhaps are not as fortunate as you.
They deserve a chance to further their minds, and you deserve a community whose future remains hopeful and full of positives and potentials thanks to a properly funded public library existing to serve everyone, not just a privileged few who can somehow mistake their own disuse for the lack of needs of others.
We know otherwise. We know our communities need us. We hear it, see it, and are reminded of that every day we open our doors or pick up the phone or answer our electronic reference questions.
Those needs will not go away. In fact, those needs have increased, become more intricate and involved, requiring of us more knowledge, better research tools, faster response times, all while conducting these activities within budgetary constraints and the knowledge that not everyone will understand or appreciate our efforts.
Regardless, we meet all these challenges on your behalf, your community’s behalf, every day, whether you choose to understand it or not, and we will do so for as long as we can.
Thank you for considering these words.
I want to privatize libraries.
I want members to pay $100,000 just for the privilege of belonging. Then I want them to pay another $5,000 a year to borrow.
I want to burn each book in a huge incinerator as it’s returned and replace it on the shelf with a fresh copy.
I want live musical performances in the lounge. Maybe a harp.
I want hot towels in the bathroom. I want the bathroom renamed to “lounge.”
And I want to be refered to as The Librarian, and not “that effing librarian” as my boss says before she spits.
Tongue firmly in cheek
If you read that column from start to finish, it sure doesn’t come off as a clarion call for privatizing libraries…consider the analogous “cases” made first.
To my eye, the Opinionator’s tongue was firmly in cheek.
I agree somewhat
Privatization is a strange thing. That column did not appear to propose governments divesting themselves of owning libraries. It did seem in favor of contracting out operations and cites LSSI multiple times. That is a more gradual slide towards divestment although agencies like NASA seem to continue to exist even with so much of the work being carried out by contractors.
________________________
Stephen Michael Kellat, Host, LISTen
PGP KeyID: 899C131F
how does one decide?
How would you know which material/books you object and which ones you support if you have access to neither?
Because
you’d be being told by the people running it. And if you joined a private Republic Christian library you’d know there was nothing you’d object to.
There’s a difference between
There’s a difference between “privatizing” a library and what LSSI does. LSSI just takes over management of the library; it’s still free to use and open to everyone. It’s still a public library.
Here in Oregon, our libraries were completely shuttered. LSSI came in and was able to re-open them. Without them we didn’t have ANY library. I’m all for paying a more to support our libraries, but couldn’t convince everyone else to follow along. All I know is, now we have our libraries back, and as far as I can tell it’s pretty much the same; even most of the same people still work there.