Fang-Face writes “Here is a book review on a work by a censorship advocate, written by Marjorie Heins and posted to the Free Expression Policy Project. The author, Kevin Saunders, is basically calling for the kind of draconian measures that would ensure mass book burnings in the library parking lot to clear all the “hate speech” and “Harmful To Minors” material from the shelves. The review also has a link to a reply by Saunders.
At first glance, I would say Saunders’s agenda is based on the same basic attitude that wholesale filtering is: Adults are forbidden to speak in the presence of children, or where any child might be present.”
Fang’s pontifications as “news”
Why not just post an article and let us judge for ourselves? Is your case really so weak that you have to bash people over the head with it before we even have a chance to read the article
Re:Fang’s pontifications as “news”
Is your intellect really so weak that you can’t think for yourself and see beyond what other people say?
I did post a link with that article, and I know that it works because I tested it before clicking on the SUBMIT option. So anyone who wishes to can read the article to judge it for themselves. Of course, that presupposes that the person can and does think for themselves.
And if you are so incensed by everything I write, why do you insist on reading it? What is about you that makes you so incompetent you can’t even skip over a message with my name in it? The first piece of text in every story suggestion is the name of the person who submitted it. Have you got some kind of reverse dyslexia that you CAN’T STOP reading something prefaced with the word “Fang-Face”?
Re:Fang’s pontifications as “news”
I’m oddly draw to your posts because I enjoy seeing you occassionally pitch a hissy fit.