Moore’s 9/11 banned by theater owner

Re:Michael Moore’s movie
He did not simply ban this film he banned any politically centered films. If Rush Limbaugh (when not hiting the Vicodin or the wife) were to come out with a movie these theaters would not show that either.

Now as a con (as opposed to a neocon, not someone from state prison) I think that is just dandy, because I can make up my own mind by evaluating the issues and people, not having propaganda spoon fed to me.

Show more good movies. If Gone With the Wind or the orignial Star Wars were in theaters I would see more movies than I do with the crap that is available today.

Spiderman my arse, that is a comic book.

Re:Then DON’T!
Flamebait that mentions me personally deserves an appropriate response. If someone can use my name in their comments, hiding behind anonymity is hypocritical and cowardly.

No one is required to disclose their email address. Your argument that one may not want to give one’s email address to yet another website is specious since your email is not disclosed.

I am not the one who first used the term “ban� when referring to Moore’s latest film. The headline writer for the Wichita Eagle was the first. Perhaps you should have read the article.

To call Moore’s film a documentary is laughable. Even he does not call it a documentary, however that may be in an effort to avoid violating campaign finance laws that could restrict advertising if it were a documentary. Since Moore considers it an Op-Ed piece, and since the political slant nears 270 degrees it fails to qualify as a documentary in my book.

Of course I am not opposed to a laissez faire economy. Business owners should be allowed to do as they please. If this gentleman does not want overtly political nonsense in his theaters more power to him. The fact that it did well at the box office speaks volumes about the superiority of our free market democracy, the same system evolving in Iraq.

So before cowards post anonymous poorly reasoned vitriol twisting my words I suggest they read and re-read what I wrote. I never suggested that I was being coerced or forced to see the film. I noted that I did not agree with the theater owner that showing Moore’s film would lead to terrorism, and I noted that propaganda comes from both the right and the left.

The cowardly anonymous response directed at me shows the mere mention of Moore’s film in a not entirely laudatory light upsets the radical left so much that they launch ad hominem attacks on those proposing reasoned discussion. I feel sorry for the individuals because they are wound so tightly that they violently recoil without digesting the facts spouting nonsense commentary and not helping their cause. However this is beneficial in that undecided voters can choose between reasoned discussion from the right, or angry anti-establishment venom from the radical left.

Anonymous ad hominem attacks demonstrate only cowardice and ignorance, not unexpected from those who can’t objectively discuss the issues. I am quite willing to engage in reasoned discussion. Twisting my words in a feeble attempt to make a point is childish, poorly designed argument, and to be blunt simply stupid.

Re:Then DON’T! and wear a mask!
Sorry, not in Florida it is against the law to wear a mask. (F.S.S § 876.12 et seq.) I don’t make them, I don’t enforce them, I just obey them.

Oh I am going to miss our date anonymous. I get all a flutter when masks come into the equation. Or Margaritas same effect.

Where did I say I would never see the movie? I said I would never pay to see the movie, I even said I would pay not to see the movie. But I never said I would not see the movie. Everything has its price. You vote for Nader and I’ll have a screening on my garage door for entire neighborhood.