Libraries without books?

Eli says:

Fahrenheit 451?
Has human history recorded through the written word come to an end? In Fahrenheit 451 the elimination of the written was not sufficient, if any written word existed it needed to be destroyed. Making a choice to end or limit book buying has many implications and possible scenarios. People who are not computer literate or are computer fearful will be left out of the educational process. It means that the computer and non-print producers dictate the way we get our information. This is not freedom it is telling the population that unless you get with the times you are not entitled to self educate yourselves. Should the library be an accomplice in this forced usage of new technology. Secondly, if we are opting for electronic presentation will someone come along and say that is the only form of expression. Could book burning come next? Could publsihers be forced to close their doors? What about the educational method of teacher and disciple? The printed word is the medium? If information is obtained solely from the computer then it can be more easily tampered with, and gives greater opportunity for misinformation. People may not agree with me but it is my belief that the computer is a partner to the printed word not a usurper. Just look at the discrepancies in news reporting of different networks and their slants. The written word gives a longer time to study evaluate and make intelligent comments and decisions. Look at how much discussion there is concerning spy equipment on computers. There is a greater chance of people snooping on our reading habits on the computer than with hard copy. I think that libraries should give more thought concerning replacing books with electronic alternatives and our professional organizations should discuss this issue and create policy and standards that reflect our American history and heritage.