I am giving a presentation to some law students about libraries, librarians, and copyright. One thing I was asked to address can only be answered by you. As a librarian what copyright issues effect you? Second question is, what topics of copyright or areas that deal with copyright should librarians be concerned with? If you have any other general comments about libraries, librarians, and copyright I would like to hear them.
- Next Health information should be easier to find – especially from within the hospital
- Previous Library to hand over children left after hours to Police
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Copyright issues with ETDs
Some universities have begun accepting theses and dissertations in electronic format (ETDs). Some universities have made ETDs mandatory. Typically, universities send them to ProQuest (UMI) for their dissertations service (which is subscription based) as well as archive them on a local web server. During the submission process, the Thesis Office has to get permission from the student to release the ETD. The student is the copyright holder and can request that a certain level of access be granted, anything from held from public view, restricted to certain people, or released for public access. Students that hold or restrict access typically do so because they are applying for a patent or publishing portions of the ETD in a commercial journal. There are a couple of problems for libraries. First, (depending on the school) libraries play a role in developing access policy. These policies are quite different from school to school. Second, libraries may have to enforce access as stipulated by the student, which can be difficult for restricted access ETDs.
Two points for your consideration.
I’m not a librarian. I’m a frequent patron of my local libraries (I’m fortunate to have two libraries in my area). But I have two points that could be pertinant:
– Licensing works for temporary storage — Some libraries license works for patrons and pay for the license. Unfortunately, the license is not perpetual (for the term of copyright, of course), and copying is disallowed, therefore the only copy of the work the library has can disappear whenever the copyright holder says so. Librarians should be aware of this (in my opinion) colossal waste of money because they are essentially offering something to patrons that can be yanked away, instead of offering an ongoing resource.
It would be nice if more librarians knew about permissive licensing and the public domain so they could request copies of works that can be preserved and migrated from one reading technology to another as needed.
– The term of copyright being so long and being extendable is a problem for librarians because it means that librarians who are waiting to make copies of works currently under copyright (for preservation, for instance) have to wait more time thus increasing the chances that the work will turn to dust or become completely unreadable because it’s recorded on magnetic media.
libraries, and disappearing sources
>offering something to patrons that can be yanked away, instead of offering an ongoing resource.
This also occurs with any aggressive weeding scheme (or even just standard loss). I’ve used books, and come back next month to re-check them out, and had them gone. What good is a book that you can view only once? Especially if someone challenges you, and asks you to cite your sources? While I’m a big fan of libraries, and I will pay taxes to have them available, I’ve quit reading, referencing, watching, or listening to things that I don’t own copies of.
— Ender, Duke_of_URL
copyright question
As a librarian I have several concerns. The first is the most recent extension of the copyright protection to well beyond the average author’s lifetime. This latest extension, courtesy of the Sonny Bono Act, pretty much ensures that out of print works are more difficult to locate. Another problem has become increased difficulty in tracking down the copyright holder to request permission to make it available via re-printing, digitation, etc. due to the longer time span between the initial publication and the period of time it ends up in the out of print category. My second concern is the impact of the DMCA on the fair use of digital resources — particularly in the realm of technology restrictions on one’s ability to create a legal archival copy of a work and the difficulty in obtaining the necessary code or hardware adaptors do the job. That said, my third concern is also related to the DMCA and centers around software licenses. Basically, a software license can eradicate “fair use” as it applies to print materials under the copyright law itself. And I pity any librarin who has the bad luck to have to explain THAT concept to the general public. (I face that on an average of several times a month). Most people understand the fair use concept and assume it applies to all formats. Frequently, the library finds itself restricted to “renting” the resource rather than “purchasing” the resource. For example, the library can purchase a book, put that book on the shelf, purchase updates for 1 year or 2 years or even a couple of months before cancelling the subscription and still own the book. Not true under many licensing agreements for the electronic format. Instead, the library suscribes to the resource and has full access during the subscription period but loses all access (even to the material it had during the subscription period sans current updates) as soon as that subscription is cancelled. Additionally, shrinkwrap licenses may or may not be enforceable depending upon the state one in which one is located as that is determined by state law. The net effect is to create an additional problem of consistency for both librarians and public. Despite the posting of the appropriate copyright protection signs above computers, the poor librarian often finds himself trapped in the position of being the “copyright police” .