Daniel writes “An announcement for “Being Human: Readings from the President’s Council on Bioethics” is available. According to the press release “It contains 95 selections from sources as wide-ranging as Homer, Tolstoy, Shakespeare, American folk songs, contemporary fiction and poetry, and even a screenplay. Each selection is accompanied by an introduction that directs readers toward its bioethical implications, and provides questions for groups reading together or individuals studying alone.”
It will be distributed to all 1043 Federal Depository Libraries. I’ve heard that it may not be available on-line owing to the copyrighted nature of some of the readings.
Looks like it will be a helpful addition to libraries interested in hot issues of bioethics.”
- Next Electronic Archives of ‘Video Nasties’ websites
- Previous Libraries send Book Teasers by Email to lure Patrons – New Trend
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Born again ethics
I wouldn’t trust that report any more than I would trust unsubstantiated rumours of business dealings. Especially in light of the Bush administration’s ultra-conservatism. I’ll simply assume that this so called bioethics report is a load of self-righteous claptrap, until I decide otherwise, thank you very much.
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18259
The Christian Taliban
By Stephen Pizzo, AlterNet
March 28, 2004
During the Taliban rule of Afghanistan the world got a good look at what
happens when religious zealots gain control of a government. Television
images of women being beaten forced to wear burkas and banned from schools
and the workplace helped build strong public support for the President’s
decision to invade Afghanistan in the wake of 9/11.
But even as President George W. Bush denounced the brutal Islamic
fundamentalist regime in Kabul, he was quietly laying the foundations for
his own fundamentalist regime at home. For the first time far right
Christian fundamentalists had one of their own in the White House and the
opportunity to begin rolling back decades of health and family planning
programs they saw as un-Christian, if not downright sinful.
Since 2001 dozens of far-right Christian fundamentalists have been quietly
installed in key positions within the Department of Health and Human
Services, the Federal Drug Administration and on commissions and advisory
committees where they have made serious progress. Three years later this
administration has established one of the most rigid sexual health agendas
in the Western world.
It began immediately. One of George W. Bush’s first acts as president was
to issue an executive memorandum reinstating a global abortion “gag rule.”
The rule was first implemented under Ronald Reagan but revoked during the
two Clinton administrations. The rule prohibited federally funded family
planning providers from even discussing abortion with their clients.
Bush’s order reflected the views of those at farthest reaches of the
Christian right, zealots who saw any means by which women controlled
reproduction as unbiblical:
“I would like to outlaw contraception…contraception is disgusting –
people using each other for pleasure.” -Joseph Scheidler, Pro-Life Action
League
“I don’t think Christians should use birth control. You consummate your
marriage as often as you like – and if you have babies, you have babies.”
Randall Terry, Operation Rescue
Over the next twelve months the administration moved quickly to install
similarly-minded Christian fundamentalists to positions of authority and
influence over all matters relating to reproductive and sexual health.
Dr. Alma Golden: appointed Deputy Assistant Secretary of Population
Affairs. A Texas pediatrician, she is a longtime proponent of abstinence
as the only acceptable means of birth control. Dr. Golden declared that
henceforth the department would stress “abstinence-only” as the solution
to unwanted pregnancies, not just for teens, but unmarried adults as well.
Tom Coburn: Former Republican congressman and anti-condom crusader.
Appointed co-chair of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV and AIDS.
While in congress Coburn tried to force condom manufacturers to label
condoms as “ineffective” against the spread of sexually transmitted
infections. “I will challenge the national focus on condom use to prevent
the spread of HIV,” Coburn said upon his appointment.
Dr. Joseph McIlhaney, Jr.: Appointed to Coburn on the HIV and AIDS
advisory council. McIlhaney has a long and well-documented history of
disseminating misleading data on condom failure rates. He was appointed in
spite of the fact that in 1995 Governor George W. Bush’s own Texas
Commissioner of Health openly denounced McIhaney’s anti-condom propaganda
and his professional credibility.
Dr. W. David Hager: Appointed to the FDA’s Reproductive Health Drugs
Advisory Committee. Dr. Hager served as spokesperson for the Christian
Medical Association. He authored the book, As Jesus Cared for Women:
Restoring Women Then and Now, and co-authored a book that recommended
scripture readings and prayers to relieve the symptoms of PMS. Dr. Hager
opposes prescribing contraceptives to unmarried women and spearheaded a
petition drive by the Christian Medical Association to revoke the FDA’s
approval of mifepristone, the so-called “morning after pill.”
Dr. Joseph B. Stanford: Also appointed to the Reproductive Health Drugs
Advisory Committee. Dr. Stanford is on record for his belief that the only
acceptable form of contraception, besides abstinence, is the all-natural
“rhythm method.” Dr. Stanford refuses to prescribe contraceptives, stating
that “(modern) medicine is permeated with attitudes toward sexuality and
fertility that are incompatible with Christian values of the sanctity of
life, marriage, and procreation, attitudes that both reflect and
perpetuate the recreational approach to sexuality found in our secular
culture.”
Susan A. Crockett: The third Christian fundamentalist appointed to the
same FDA committee. Crockett served as a board member of the American
Association of Pro-life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. She co-authored,
“Using Hormone Contraceptives is a Decision Involving Science, Scripture,
and Conscience” in the book, The Reproductive Revolution: A Christian
Appraisal of Sexuality, Reproductive Technologies and the Family. The book
was edited by Dr. Hager.
When the hot issue of stem-cell research came up, President Bush dismissed
two members of his Council on Bioethics who had each strongly supported
the use of embryonic stem cells in research. They were replaced by three
new members who, as the pro-life Family Research Council reported, “fall
more in line with the President’s pro-life views.”
Information became a prime target of the Christian Taliban. President Bush
says he respects “good science,” when making public policy. But, the crux
of the matter apparently hinges on the definition of “good,” especially
when it comes to family-planning issues. When good science clashes with
Biblical fundamentalist beliefs in this administration, science loses
every time.
Early in 2001 Bush’s Christian Taliban began scrubbing federal information
sources of offending materials. The censorship campaign prompted
Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) to send a letter to o HHS Secretary
Thompson demanding an explanation for the removal of information from HHS
Web of scientific findings by the National Cancer Institute that, contrary
to anti-choice propaganda, abortions do not increase the risk of breast
cancer. Thompson never responded but the “cleansing” continued.
-Scientific data on condom use, long available on government health Web
sites, was removed and replaced by sermons on abstinence and alarmist
propaganda that exaggerated the risks of condom use.
-The phrase “reproductive health” was expunged and replaced with the
vague terms “related clinical preventive health services” and “related
preventive health services.”
-Links to non-governmental family planning resources were deleted.
-Web sites at the Centers of Disease Control and National Institute of
Health were cleared of scientific studies and materials relating to
abortion and condom use.
-At the CDC results from a peer-reviewed study showing that education
about condom use did not result in increased sexual activity or sex at
younger age, were deleted from the Web site.
-The NIH’s Web site was cleaned of FAQ’s on condom effectiveness and a
sexuality education curriculum called “Programs that Work.”
Good science was disappearing from government publications and Web sites
at such a pace that the Union of Concerned Scientists issued a report in
early 2004 documenting and condemning the Bush administration.
There is significant evidence that the scope and scale of the
manipulation, suppression and misrepresentation of science by the Bush
administration is unprecedented… There is a well-established pattern
of suppression and distortion of scientific findings by high-ranking
Bush administration political appointees across numerous federal
agencies. These actions have consequences for human health, public
safety, and community well-being.” (Union of Concerned Scientists,
report, Scientific Integrity in Policymaking. 2004.)
So, even as the Bush administration denounced and battled Islamic
religious zealotry abroad it was and is nurturing a fundamentalist
Christian version here at home, much to the delight of radical right-wing
Christians.
“Contrary to popular opinion, the Bible is not neutral about what kind of
government we should have,” states Dr. Mark Allen Ludwig, author of True
Christian Government.
“God gave governments responsibility only for infrastructure and defense,” … Christians who carefully study the Bible are best qualified
according to an article by Rev. Bob Enyart, pastor of Denver Bible Church.
“If government limited itself to its two just functions, thereby getting
out of education, health care, farming, etc., it could better defend
America.
to teach the world how it should be governed.”
One of the oldest and best-established forces in the Christian Taliban
attack on secular government has been the Christian Coalition. Recently
the group threw its full weight behind the President’s push for a
constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The Christian Coalition has
been conducting a “Let’s Take America Back” national petition drive over
the last several months, which now also includes support for the so-called
Federal Marriage Amendment. The Christian Coalition mission statement
states:
We are driven by the belief that people of faith have a right and a
responsibility to be involved in the world around them. That involvement
includes community, social and political action. Whether on a stump, in
print, over the airways the Christian Coalition is dedicated to
equipping and educating God’s people with the resources and information
to battle against anti-family legislation.
What is remarkable is that this was accomplished without significant
public outcry. The reason is that America’s Christian Taliban are more
public relations savvy than their Islamic counterparts. No American women
are being forced to cover up, beaten for appearing in public wearing make
up, or barred from the workplace. The changes being made are more subtle
and less visibly shocking. They are incremental, technical, administrative
– but far-reaching.
They have also gotten away with it because we Americans like to consider
ourselves tolerant and respectful of religious beliefs. Openly criticizing
someone’s religious beliefs ranks right up there with racism and bigotry –
a fact the Christian Right has used to stifle opposition to its agenda.
Mainstream Christians share secularists’ concern over workings of Bush’s
Christian Taliban. Speaking at the National Press Club last year,
Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice President Rev. Carlton W.
Veazey condemned the “back-door attempts by the Bush Administration to
radically alter policies and practices concerning abortion, family
planning, and sexuality education to conform to extreme views.”
So, it may be time admit that our tolerance of Christian fundamentalists
is turning us into a nation of chumps. By claiming it is they who are
being persecuted, the Christian Taliban have cowed mainstream Christians
and secularists into silence, even as they impose their own faith-based
governance upon us.
We need to reconnect with a fundamental ingredient of America’s strength:
the separation of church and state. That wall of separation has for over
two centuries spared Americans ftom the kind of religious strife witnessed
in Bosnia, the Middle East, Northern Ireland and Afghanistan.
Mixing religious dogma and public policy always creates an explosive
compound – and it always blows.
Freedom from Religion
I agree with Fang, that the separation of church and state is necessary if not critical for the health of our nation. It is only with proper separation that people can be free from others religious beliefs.
Bush admin. can quote all the Shakespeare they like about what makes a human, but I would no more take the select quotes of an administration with such an obvious religious adgenda as fact as I would look to quotes from the church in the middle ages about astronomy for facts.
I’ll take the best of CURRENT science for my evidence, and there is enough room for debate there without digging up the dead.
Re:Freedom from Religion
I didn’t say this report necessarily had facts. I said: “Looks like it will be a helpful addition to libraries interested in hot issues of bioethics.”
I haven’t read the book, so I’m not in a position to pass judgement. However, it does, for good or ill, partially represent the thinking of this administration on bioethics issues and as such, would be useful to people studying how bioethics are practiced in America. A library supporting the study of bioethics would also do well to include the works of Peter Singer, even though I find him personally reprehensible.
I wish I could think of a less extreme example, but for similar reasons I think it would be important for a library to have a copies of Mein Kampf and Stalin’s speeches on hand if they supported the study of totalitarianism.
Hope this clears the air some.
Re:Freedom from Religion
Absolutely, I agree that if taken in that context it is interesting, however, only interesting. Not complete, nor objective, or factual.
I do agree that it represents the thinking of this administration, and is definitely of value to a collection. Absolutely.
free download
This book was available free for the asking last month, but they ran out after the New York Times wrote about it on March 13. You can still download it for free, one chapter at a time, here (scroll down for the Table of Contents).
Re:free download
Correcting my own post: the whole book isn’t downloadable. However, anyone really interested in reading all the selections (unedited) could consult the Table of Contents to fill in the gaps.
Re:Born again ethics
I wouldn’t trust that report any more than I would trust unsubstantiated rumours of business dealings.
I find it hilarious that fang-face rails against this report while at the same time cites something entitled “The Christian Taliban” from some fringe web site.
Re:Born again ethics
I find it hilarious that you are misrepresenting my position and engaging in a straw man argument while cowering behind a facade of anonymity.
Re:Born again ethics
Straw-man this and straw-man that. Every post is a mention to a straw-man. Quit dipping into the straw-man well, you are running out. I can feel the Ray Bolger rolling over in his grave.
You find it hilarious? From your website I didn’t think you had a sense of humor.
Re:Born again ethics
Every post is a mention to a straw-man.
Better get your eyes checked, there chum. I’d don’t see anywhere near that many references to straw man arguments. For that matter, I don’t see as many references as there are samples.
From your website I didn’t think you had a sense of humor.
Perhaps the humour is too sublime for you. Somebody obviously gets it:
Re:Born again ethics
Hey fang-face, there are lots of crazy drunk homeless men in the park that laugh hysterically. I don’t think they laugh because they have a sense of humor, they laugh because they are delusional. Reading your web page is like observing one of those crazy drunks in the city park.