There’s an interesting serious of Letters in the Walnut Creek Journal. The City Council wants to build a $40 million library. Kenneth Hambrick says something we should all pay attention to: “…the Internet has made traditional libraries obsolete.” He continues:
“Even the University of Texas appears to agree with the obsolete theory as it is now converting its entire undergraduate library at the Austin campus to digital form and eliminating books altogether. The prestigious Encyclopedia Britannica almost went bankrupt before it finally acceded to converting to electronic form.
Unfortunately most library officials still think in terms of printed material. They resist the idea that the world has changed and that the Internet has been the vehicle of change for information resources. Yes, when I was at the university lo those many years ago, the only resources available for research resided in the libraries.“
There’s a previous letter from Deborah Dobbs who says “With Internet, a new library is not needed” and one from Barbara Branton who argues “spending money and resources to build a new library in Walnut Creek is top priority.”
Calling the downtown library branch a “disgrace” and an “embarrassment,” City Council members have unanimously agreed that a new library should be constructed with partial funding from general obligation bonds to be paid off through property tax assessments.
Login required to read everything: [email protected] & lisnews1 will get you in.
There’s an interesting serious of Letters in the Walnut Creek Journal. The City Council wants to build a $40 million library. Kenneth Hambrick says something we should all pay attention to: “…the Internet has made traditional libraries obsolete.” He continues:
“Even the University of Texas appears to agree with the obsolete theory as it is now converting its entire undergraduate library at the Austin campus to digital form and eliminating books altogether. The prestigious Encyclopedia Britannica almost went bankrupt before it finally acceded to converting to electronic form.
Unfortunately most library officials still think in terms of printed material. They resist the idea that the world has changed and that the Internet has been the vehicle of change for information resources. Yes, when I was at the university lo those many years ago, the only resources available for research resided in the libraries.“
There’s a previous letter from Deborah Dobbs who says “With Internet, a new library is not needed” and one from Barbara Branton who argues “spending money and resources to build a new library in Walnut Creek is top priority.”
Calling the downtown library branch a “disgrace” and an “embarrassment,” City Council members have unanimously agreed that a new library should be constructed with partial funding from general obligation bonds to be paid off through property tax assessments.
Login required to read everything: [email protected] & lisnews1 will get you in.
not true
Actually the University of Texas relocated one of their libraries’ book collection to “discipline-specific campus libraries.” They have more than 7 million items.
Non-Readers
As a librarian colleague said a couple weeks ago, “people who say things like that are not readers.”
I just had to ask a librarian…
To track down a book, since google wasn’t coming up with any information – like the ISBN or whatnot…
It was Comic Sections by McHale. A librarian found only 52 of those books in libraries around the world. Yeah, there’s an entry on amazon, no sellers….
— Ender, Duke_of_URL
Internet. . .
So, Mister Hambrick has “had enough experience with library studies to know that librarians are prone to only think in print terms.” I wonder what library school he went to. Most librarians right out of library school would certainly have a laugh out of that. Heck, let me go further and say that most practicing librarians will likely ask “what rock has he been under?” We may think in terms of print, but it is certainly not the only thing we think about. Overall, the internet is a wonderful tool, but it is that, a tool. Not everything is in it. You want to read the latest Harry Potter. Guess what? You have to either buy it or borrow it at your local library. Yes, the library, the one people like him want to turn into a digital dystopia. And that is just one example. Hmm, I actually had to think print for that one.
It is unfortunate that people out there still think in those terms. Books and print are not going away anytime soon. The internet has made many things easier, and you can certainly find many, many things, good and bad, in it and through it. Yet, there are certain things you find quicker in books, and sometimes you just want to curl up in bed with a good book. Even if people have a wireless laptop, I don’t see many of them reading from them before bed anytime soon. Just some ideas. This whole “the internet is making libraries obsolete” argument can be refuted in so many ways. I will just say this. As long as people need assistance in making the best of the information they find, librarians will be around. As long as they continue reading books, magazines, etc., libraries will be around. They will be more blended; they will certainly have a lot more technology, but as for going away, hardly.
Re:Non-Readers
Try not to say that in front of Ms. Dobbs too loudly, after all, she found all her articles on a medical condition to read on the internet. She “reads.” In seriousness, I am sure she does, but she fails to take into account all the other information she likely did not see because she is simply using Google. That whole invisible web. I wonder if she has a library card, and if so, does she use it to get access to databases from home? You can find a lot of things on the internet; I could never deny it, but not everything, and that is where their argument always fails. As for young people not reading newspapers. Actually, she should look at the numbers of people who read fiction and the need for reader’s advisors for instance. She wants these readers to get their books at Costco and Amazon, the libraries of the future? I guess access for all is not a problem for her since she can afford it. What about the other readers who are not as lucky. I guess after all, non-readers indeed.
First, kill all the librarians… .pdf files are no longer the norm? Any good research library has a collection of those titles in 5.25″ diskettes that are only fifteen years old. Even if you could find the computer left that can read those diskettes, many have obsolete software such as WordStar, DBI or Pen, which are no longer available or readable.
Actually, I’m rather bored by the whole argument. Since the Internet is only ten years old (in the public mind, the Internet prior to 1995 was unusable), what do they believe will happen when html and
I recnetly got into a debate with a hydrologist who said only computer printed works five years old or younger were worthwhile. I told him I was pleased to find someone who admits all his work that is more than five years old can be tossed away as being irrelevant. His Ph.D. thesis, his textbooks, journal articles, water resource investigations, everything. In fact, he could be fired as being irrelevant himself, and someone with less than 5 years experience could take his place instead, and at a lesser salary. He said his work was based on solid experience and writings. I said yes, but all his writings were in print, and most were over 5 years old. Thus, by his own reasoning, he was irrelevant.
What is amusing about this whole thing is that the Walnut Creek Journal should stop publishing in print and go to Internet only. But then, the local newspaper is obsolete, since all the news is already on the Internet. And its free. And easy to find. And correct, unbiased and chatter free. Just access any blog…
Re:First, kill all the librarians…
I hope they are not killing the librarians any time soon. I did like the example with the hydrologist. It just rings so true of people who think always that the newer technologies will make the old ones obsolete. I take it he still has a job in spite of his aging? I do find it interesting that very often the technologies go obsolete, such as those 5.25 disks, so quickly. Like you point out well, it was not that long ago in the great scheme of things (q5 years). And yet, books and print have been around for ages, and we still read books. Definitely one piece of technology that remains readable today and will continue to do so long after DVDs, CDs, MP3s and so on are likely replaced by the next best thing. Just a thought. Best.