Self-publishing made easy online is a C|Net story on Blurb.com.
“access to a computer can make a book and get it professionally printed. The company offers free downloadable software, called BookSmart, which enables people without design experience to easily lay out the pages, choose background colors and fonts and edit photos. The design templates were created by book design experts.”
- Next NY LSTA Five-Year Plan Available for Comment
- Previous Security guard at SC library fires at car
Recent Posts
- GPT-fabricated scientific papers on Google Scholar: Key features, spread, and implications for preempting evidence manipulation September 16, 2024
- Poetry Book Checked Out in 1974 Returned to Library 50 Years Later September 12, 2024
- What Happens When a School Closes Its Library? September 12, 2024
- Library dispute in Mobile, AL as one official ponders Bible ban September 11, 2024
- Why a ruling against the Internet Archive threatens the future of America’s libraries September 11, 2024
- Nebraska Library Commission hears from public over controversial new appointment September 9, 2024
- Internet Archive’s court loss leaves higher ed in gray area September 9, 2024
Recent Comments
- Dottie spears on The Black Section at WalMart; Segregating Titles by Subjects’ Skin Color
- Dee on The Black Section at WalMart; Segregating Titles by Subjects’ Skin Color
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
LISNews Archives
- September 2024 (10)
- August 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
ad campaign
“Yet another way of annoying people with your stupid novel!”
“Self-publishing: So you wanna be a crank … “
“Cover = good”
“Self-publishing: It’s like taking an ugly guy to the prom. Hey at least you’re there and your shoes are cute.”
Re:ad campaign
Your comment is kinda snarky. Many self-published books are worthwhile, more are not. You can’t lump them all into the same basket.
The bigger issue is that these “do-it-yourself” outfits don’t warn self-publishers that once they publish 1,000 or 5,000 or more of their own titles, what the heck are they going to do with them? They provide the tools for self-publishing, but not for marketing, and it’s marketing that’s sometimes even more challenging than writing a book. Mostly these books end up in the author’s closet/garage/basement/relative’s closet/etc. etc.
Re:ad campaign
How many crappy books have been put out by “real” publishers? The sad fact about publishing is that it isn’t primarily about how good a story is, how well it’s written, or how it speaks to a reader. It’s about, “Can I sell it to as many readers as possible?”
Small and independent presses, unfortunately, are in the same boat with the big boys, and it’s amazing how many rejection letters I’ve gotten with a hand written note at the bottom, “We’d love to, but we can’t afford to print this title” or “We’d love to, but we’re backed up for the next five years” or “We’d love to, but we’re printing our last book ever tomorrow.”
Publishers want proven formulas. They do. It’s sad, but it’s true. They can use some poor peon editors to pretty up prose, if it sucks badly, so that it is at least somewhat readable. Then they can release it, hype it, and sell it. Was the “Da Vinci Code” stellar prose? No. But it did have a catchy story that could be hyped up.
Would “Of Mice and Men” be published today? It’s short. I mean, short is good in most publishing scenarios, but it’s really short. Writers have used the works of Steinbeck et al. to test publishers… They’ve sent typed manuscripts of classic works to big houses, only to be rejected… not because anyone recognized it… but because these stories were “unsaleable.”
It’s a business, publishing. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it makes it extremely difficult to break into, and more difficult to make a living at.
Granted, I’m partial. My book was published by a small press, dropped, and then I POD’d it on Lulu. Honestly, I’ve made more money from it on Lulu than I did at the small press, and I felt like I had more say over the matter. There was nothing as difficult for me as signing that contract with the first publisher, having them basically take most of my rights (which is standard for new authors) and then basically let it sit there. I was, for lack of a better phrase, sofa king happy when they discontinued my title and gave me back the rights.
There are good self-published books out there. PODdy Mouth is one site that seems to really handpick the best. Real live publishing contracts sometime come from real live publishers after a self-published book hits it off.
True, there are a lot of sucky self published books. But I’m betting the mediocre self-published book to mediocre traditionally published book ratio is about even.
Re:ad campaign
I don’t think the “bigger issue” applies–certainly not to outfits like Lulu, and I think not to Blurb. The breakthrough in contemporary self-publishing is that you don’t “publish 1,000 or 5,000 or more.” You put up two PDFs (one for the book, one for the cover)–and books get produced one at a time when they’re ordered.
Reasonably-priced, high-quality PoD is the key here. Sure, if you want to sell a bunch, you need marketing–but there should be no unwanted copies.
Blurb’s problem is that their prices are way too high, at least for books that aren’t full-color productions. That may change in the future–but I think you’re paying a considerable premium for the canned designs. Which, for a lot of people who really do just want to have a few copies of something, may be perfect.
Re:ad campaign
If you look at
http://www.lulu.com/
for example
you will see that you can make 1 book ..no need to make a thousand…
they also provide marketing.
Could be very useful for the organization of text and graphics for any purpose or presentation
Yes , the previous comment was snarky possibly pretentiously uninformed…a confusion of quality and marketing…or maybe just downright snotty…
It’s much bigger vision than the ….self publishing is bad belief
I’m going to do one for a friend of mine who is a poet…
very difficult for a poet to get published…not a good market…does it mean he ought not to have a book of his poems because there is not a market ?
Listen to commercial radio…has the music gotten better because record companies are involved ?
my answer is yes, he should have a book of his poetry in his possession and if any one else wants one they should have the opportunity to obtain one…and no …commercial radio music has not gotten better because record publishers are involved… they just make sure they can market the music…a style of unified texture.
Re:ad campaign
I’m not sure about “they also provide marketing”–realistically, for the kind of niche books Lulu does, the author needs to do the marketing–but otherwise, yes.
And I’m not looking down my nose at people who use Lulu. I fully intend to do so myself later this year for a book that I hope will sell a few hundred copies–because I want it out fast, and because I don’t think it has quite a wide enough market for the traditional publisher I’d most likely discuss it with. Since I do have 13 traditionally-published books under my belt, it’s really not a “no other choice” scenario.
I think Shoe has it about right as well. Fortunately, with good PoD, there’s room for all three–big commercial publishing, small commercial publishing, and self-publishing/Publish-on-Demand. (There’s still vanity press publishing, but that’s a different and, I believe, distinguishable area.)
Re:ad campaign
Bingo…you nailed it…
there’s room for all three–big commercial publishing, small commercial publishing, and self-publishing/Publish-on-Demand. (There’s still vanity press publishing, but that’s a different and, I believe, distinguishable area.)
Re:ad campaign … consider strongly … very strongly, like a big strong thing, that …
Turner
all things considered in consideration in the considerer … you might need,
to lighten up.
Re:ad campaign
I’ll consider it strongly
very strongly
I’ll be the considereator
then I’ll decide on what I considered
then I’ll be the decideator and the considerator
hopefully this process will take me to the desireiffic state of lightuousness …