Anonymous Patron writes “From townonline.com
A few questions present themselves. First, was he really on the library’s Wi-FI network? He could have been using a Verizon or Sprint cellular card or something like that. He also could have acquired the movie before coming to the library.
Second, has anyone out there seen or heard of anything like this anywhere else? The only one I know of was out in Arizona some months back, as I recall. That one involved a college student in a campus library, though.
Either way-YUK!”
Library Director Admits Library’s Failure as Cause
The incident resulted because of a failure on the part of the library.
“Library Director Ellen Riboldi said a problem with the library’s blocking software, which blocks chat rooms, adult sites and other sites deemed inappropriate, allowed Spackman to bypass the library’s security measures for both wireless and other computer Internet use. Many libraries don’t have blockers, she said.”
yes and no
Show me a porn filter that blocks all porn and I’ll show you black plastic trash bag.
Filters suck, but less than no filters.
Filters suck, not the concept that surely is a local decision, however their effectiveness is not absolute.
That said $500 bond for child porn movies seems a bit low. It seems more like $50K would be a good start. If you can afford a laptop, you can cough up a 5K to get yourself bonded out of jail.
Or you could simply admit your guilt and go to PMITA prison you disgusting pervert.
Just cut it off…
Just cut it off…
Unless it’s changed
In that article there is no mention that it has anything to do with the internet.
Saying that anyone who is stupid enough to even try looking at any pornography in a library is a moron for many reasons. If you didn’t want to get caught I would have though there are better places to mooch bandwidth.
Re:yes and no
Show me a hard and fast definition for porn that can be applied objectively to differentiate between pornography and offended hypersensitivities.