InfoWhale writes “Nat Hentoff has been writing for several months now about ALA’s refusal to join Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and other groups demanding the release of imprisoned librarians and journalists. He has finally decided to officially renounce his 1983 ALA Immroth Award for intellectual freedom.
Story Here“
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Why was the amendment voted down
Anyone know who the five people were who voted for Karen Schneider’s amendment (or was it a secret ballot)? Why did the council vote so strongly against it–was there a hidden political agenda?
Shame..
Shame on the ALA…shame on their hypocrisy and shame on those who sill remain silent while our peers are imprisoned in Cuba. I am disgusted with it all…
David (who once was a proud member of the ala but no more….)
Re:Shame..
I was under the impression these people weren’t librarians but spies/antagonists sent by the CIA and assorted American Cubans. I can’t remember where I read it, but it was a respectable source and not some communist propaganda thing.
Re:Why was the amendment voted down
Birdie–I don’t know who the five were, but I believe American Libraries publishes ALA Councilor voting records regularly–at least that’s what I understood from my Councilor orientation at midwinter. No secret ballots on the Council floor. (Elections are by ballot, though.)
Re:Why was the amendment voted down
The vote was done by holding up their hands…the reason why they voted so strongly for it was because two ALA committees wrote the report – and ALA Council has NEVER rejected a committee’s report.
How ALA hurts librarian image
Although I don’t introduce myself as “I’m a retired librarian who NEVER belonged to ALA,” I’ve been tempted. Thank goodness for the Veterinary Medical Libraries Section of the Medical Library Association (VMLS), the greatest, most supportive group of colleagues one could wish for, who didn’t place social and political issues on our already full plate. However, because ALA does do that, it should at least be consistent and take a stand here in support of these librarians.
I appreciate LISNews.com keeping us up to date on this issue.
Re:Shame..
Many members of ALA’s SRRT and PLG have been telling people this – so you are not alone. Ann Sparanese, ALA councilor, labor fighter, etc. has been saying all of these things…it is like Bush/Ashcroft implying that anyone who questions them are “traitors.” These people are dissidents – and everyone in the world BUT ALA has demanded their release from prison.
powerful smell of mendacity
I was involved in Trotskyist politics once upon a time, and it was usually easy to identify someone’s politics by their vocabulary and opinions. The ALA’s stand on this issue has all the hallmarks of Stalinist fellow-traveller doubletalk.
Re:How ALA hurts librarian image
Good thoughts.
Your observation regarding ALA’s penchant for muddling in social and political issues is correct. Of course many of these are blatantly liberal, anti-Republican, however one wishes to characterize.
This is the slippery slope that will, IMHO, continue to alienate ALA from many of its core constituents. The filtering business being a recent example. (ALA should have left this issue completely alone, leaving this as a “local” issue. No different than any other collection development issue because that is exactly what it is. Instead they chose to grandstand. I digress)
I think VMLS has it right. Leave politics and agendas aside. Perhaps this says something about the those who work with animals, rather than people?
Only One Side?
We’ve repeatedly heard one person’s views
on this issue.
There are other views, let’s see them.
Lisnews can do better than merely flooding
us with postings of what Nat Hentoff or Steve
Fesenmaier has to say.
Re:Only One Side?
Perhaps you should take the initiative yourself, to share these “other” views, rather than have someone else do your work?
I’m sure the good folks at Lisnews would welcome your thoughts/submissions.
Re:Only One Side? What tomeboy said
I have no problem posting almost anything on eny side of any story (how’s that for fair and balanced), but as far as I can remember I get nothing from anyone else on the Cuba stuff. I’ve got people yelling at me to stop it with the Cuba junk, and other who tell me I need to do more.
I post what seems to be most interesting, and if I ever got something that was another view I’m sure I’d post it.
Rather than complaining about what I post, send me something that I can post.
Re:Only One Side?
O.k., if you want more input–here it is. ALA is dead wrong, stupidly wrong, about Cuba, and ALA let the wrong people write the report that ALA voted on. Most of the excuses for not strengthening the language in the report were bogus, or even worse, insulting to pro-democracy people on the Left and elsewhere.
Stop painting this as a Left/Right issue. There are far too many people on the Left who disagree with ALA’s position, and who are not in love with Fidel.
ALA played right into the hands of the pro-Castro community. Nice going, ALA.
And here’s your check back, too?
Apparently, aside from a nifty plaque, there’s a chunk of change given to the recipient. I’m wondering if that’s part of the return.
Re:Why was the amendment voted down
it is my understanding that ALA Council often accepts friendly amendments to reports, which is what Karen’s “six words” was supposed to be. People have differing reasons for wanting to accept the report, or not wanting to amend the report.
Re:Shame..
The trouble as I see it is that it’s very difficult to get accurate information about what these people’s exact roles were and the two sides [they’re independent librarians versus they’re American funded spies and provocateurs] are SO far from each other that there seems to be very little middle ground through which to formulate a compromise. Many people at ALA seemed to feel that ALA would have more power trying to address this issue via lobbying the US goverment [since ALA is an American organization] to work on reform rather than the Cuban government who is not known for being particularly receptive to please from America. No one thinks it’s at all cool that these people are serving long prison terms, but the fact that people can’t even agree on what specific crimes those people are being charged with [taking money from US interests, or giving access to “forbidden ideas”] really makes this look like it’s going to be a long haul until we see a graceful resolution.
Re:Shame..
Hmm. Respectable sources aren’t usually ANONYMOUS.
Re:Shame..
Gee…”respectable sources” aren’t usually anonymous.