Fang-Face writes “A commentary by Marjorie Heins at the Free Expression Policy Project examines an incident fairly typical of moral crusaders. Two media-violence-as-violent-influence proponents, Craig Anderson and L. Rowell Huesmann, have canceled out of a conference wherein they were to debate opponents to the movement to control violence in entertainment. The attempt to discredit the opponents, Dr. Joanne Savage, criminologist at American University, and Jonathan Freedman, professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, is based on the specious argument that they are not “legitimate experts” on media violence. Actually, there is something to that; Doctor Freedman is not an expert on media violence so much as he is an expert on studies of media violence. All of which, he claims, are invalid. You can see my own opinion on the issue of media violence studies at my web site.”
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
mpa
Would this be the same Jonathon Freedman who derives his research funding from those “well-heeled, whining, profit loving lobbyists” from the Motion Picture Association?
Welcome to capitalism!
Re:mpa
This is the Jonathon Freedman who had the MPA jump onto his bandwagon and start throwing money at him well after he started his studies.
Re:mpa
It doesn’t matter who propositioned who first.
What does matter is that biases against profiteering free marketers are usually relative to whose ox is getting gored.
This moral crusader says spend well and enjoy Jonathan! Although I, and most of the scientific community, think your research (or research of research) is junk.
If interested….
Kids made aggressive by TV violence
Hamilton Spectator (Ontario, Canada)
March 10, 2003 Monday Final Edition
ADOLESCENTS’ TV-WATCHING LINKED TO LATER VIOLENCE
The Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN)
March 29, 2002 Friday Final Edition
Peace Magazine
September, 2003
not include doing any research of his own, but rather criticizing what others had already done.
the findings. In cases where no harmful effects were found the methods often pass without comment.
the most notable being the multidisciplinary Royal Commission on Violence
along with George Gerbner and his associates who have studied media
violence for over 30 years. Educational theory and practice appear
irrelevant to him.
approach…
Ottawa Citizen
May 20, 2002 Monday Final Edition
News Pg. A1
The Motion Picture Association of America, in fact, paid for him to conduct the review of the published research on media violence that forms the basis of the book — an arrangement he discloses upfront, two pages into his preface, though he declined in an interview to reveal precisely how much he was paid.
“I’m not going to tell you how much, not because it’s anything spectacular, but we agreed we wouldn’t talk about the amount,” says Mr. Freedman, who sits on the board of the Association in Defense of the Wrongfully Convicted….
Re:mpa
It doesn’t matter only if you’d rather judge according to your a priori assumptions instead of looking at the facts. And one of those facts is: a human psyche and human social interactions are too exceedingly complex and too little understood to be able to say that only one influence can be responsible for violence.
There’s a school of thought that all wars derive from population pressure. The case can easily be made that social violence is merely a matter of a society at war with itself, and that overpopulatation would cause violence irrespective of whether it was banned from films or the airwaves. However, the simple minded cannot deal with such complex ideas.
Plus, by your own a priori nonsense, none of the so called violence media researchers can possibly generate any valid results because they know nothing about sociology.
Re:mpa
Just as I predicted, “Back to Latin when your facts are lackin'”.
>>The case can easily be made that social violence is merely a matter of a society at war with itself, and that overpopulatation would cause violence irrespective of whether it was banned from films or the airwaves
Care to provide a reference to this as I do with my posts? I’d love to read this in context.
>>There’s a school of thought that all wars derive from population pressure.
There is also a school of thought that all wars derive from oil thirsty ex-Halliburton bigshots. Does this mean kiddie violence is a manifestation of little Joey having to watch mom pump her own gas because full-service is too pricy?
Your reaching here. Big time. Wars are fought for a myriad of reasons; ideologies, religions, commodities, ethnicities, beautiful women, boredom, take your pick.
I’d love to hear how population pressure factored into the Falklands War for example.
Two words, Julian Simon.
Enjoy the money Dr. Freedman.
Re:mpa
No literature, just all of human history. For the most superficial examination of violence predating violent content on television I suggest you look at the crusades, the Vandal invasions, the Mongol invasions, all warfare right up to and including the Second World War, and even the history of crime. The term “breaking and entering” that we use today stems from incidents of home invasions in medieval times. It derives from home invaders literally breaking through the thatch walls of houses by throwing a heavy object through the wall. But I’m sure that you’ll tell me that came from watching too much Punch and Judy.
As for the so called “reasons” you listed for engaging in warfare, those are simply specious excuses employed by the ignorant. People like George Bush, for instance, who know nothing about sociological interactions. At bottom, the illegal invasion of Iraq was to secure American access to middle east oil reserves to support the American population. But I’m sure you won’t understand that, either.
Re:mpa
>>At bottom, the illegal invasion of Iraq was to secure American access to middle east oil reserves to support the American population. But I’m sure you won’t understand that, either.
You’re right because it makes absolutely zero sense. I believe this would be “economic” or as I stated “commodities”. No flooding of American civilians rushing in to set up little Baghdadville’s with 24 hour Super Wal Mart’s re population pressure.
Again, your words. …and that overpopulatation would cause violence…
>>There’s a school of thought that all wars derive from population pressure.
Again, your words revised.
>>At bottom, the illegal invasion of Iraq was to secure American access to middle east oil reserves to support the American population. (what about the root of all of this warfare, overpopulation????)
What is this, six degrees from the word “population”???
It’s interesting you have now conditioned your statement to “all warfare right up to and including the Second World War” which happens to coincide with the advent of TV. Funny.
At least it’s comforting to know that we can from expect a peaceful century with Europe’s dwindling populations.
So how do we connect “population” with the Falklands?
Re:mpa
Relax, Tomeboy. Nobody expected you to get it.