Tina N. Burger dropped by to spread The Word on The Guggenheim Museum going with Koha. The Guggenheim chose LibLime for its open-source expertise, and is confident that the partnership will better enable the museum to achieve its future library automation goals: “Working with LibLime will greatly reduce the learning curve that presents itself in most new projects. As we are undertaking this project with the intent to adapt the system to our needs, rather than implementing a known system, their knowledge is invaluable.”
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
While most of us think of Open Source software as better, more flexible, collaboratively created and in some cases FREE…and in all cases SUPERIOR to traditional big vendor software…
LibLime is in this game to make profits. Not that they shouldn’t…but rumor has it their prices are comparable to the big guys…which means you save little if you go with them.
And guess what…you can download Koha for free…
but it has to be extensively customized to work for you specific situation…
You know what that means…Oracle ring a bell…?
That means what could be years of custom programming, things you need it does not do and which the pinhead of a programmer can’t conceive of and won’t do except perhaps if you buy him that Porsche he’s been wantin..
and when said virtuouso programmer quits guess what you have…a program that can’t be upgraded but does de-grade because no one else understands it or so many different people worked on it it’s a genuine Rube Goldberg mess or if someone can figure it out well, they would have “Done it all differently.”
Open Source is great if you are writing your own …but if you have to depend on others it’s
code and maintaining it yourself
programmer ego and unending money pit fixes….yuck!
Re:Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
Liblime is pricey, I agree. Not as much, maybe, as SirsiDynix or III, but I was looking at it for a small collection I catalog and it is cost prohibitive… Especially when you figure Koha is free (both in speech and beer) and web hosting is cheap. Essentially you’re paying, then, a boatload of dough for support you may or may not need.
I really do like Koha as an interface. I think it works well, and does really the core that most libraries need. And you can make it do what you want it to more easily than ringing up SirsiDynix and saying, “I need a widget that will do x.” (Believe me, for the most part, they laugh at you, or say okay, and then never deliver). However, what Liblime is charging for Koha/hosting/support, you’re better off hiring another part time (or full time) systems person who knows perl. (I don’t, btw. But that doesn’t stop me from h4x0ring the crap out of things). That way, you get someone who can support your ILS as well as work the reference desk.
Liblime is a great idea… I mean, boxed support for open source platforms is wonderful. But I think they’d get a lot more people signing on if it weren’t so steep.
Re:Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
“But I think they’d get a lot more people signing on if it weren’t so steep”
How does one decide on pricing in this situation? Perhaps liblime looked at III/Sirsi and priced down from there, rather than looking at what many libraries could afford and gone up. Or maybe they based prices more on what they thought they cold run a business and be successful.
Re:Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
“That means what could be years of custom programming, things you need it does not do and which the pinhead of a programmer can’t conceive of and won’t do except perhaps if you buy him that Porsche he’s been wantin..”
I’m flabbergasted at the ignorance and animosity on display here. Did a programmer kill your dog or something? You’re actively bashing people who *volunteer* their time, efforts and expertise to make your life better. I don’t know a single person who’s gotten rich off of open-source software and I can guarantee you the people at LibLime are not charging what they do in order to get rich.
And if you think programmers are pinheads, do it yourself. Seriously, I’d love to see what you’ve developed, and if you don’t write code I wonder why you feel justified in calling people who can do something you can’t “pinheads”.
Why do I get the feeling that if we were to do a reverse DNS lookup on the IP address of your comment we would see something like “sirsidynix.com”, “iii.com”, or “tlcdelivers.com”, and certainly not a .edu or .org? The eau de astroturf is strong in the air. Who else do you have issues with besides open source programmers? Adorable puppies? The peace corps? The neighborhood welcome wagon? The good samaritan who stops to help you when you have a flat tire?
I would love to know what commercial library software there is out there that doesn’t require extensive customization to each library’s situation and which comes with all the functionality you could ever want right out of the box (or makes it easy to add new functionality WITHOUT access to the source code and without paying through the nose for custom development from the vendor). Yeah, that’s what I thought.
Re:Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
Perhaps. It’s not that I don’t want them to make money and succeed… Hell, if everyone were using OSS, I’d be psyched.
I guess my contention is this… I was quoted roughly $4,000, IIRC, for a smaller database (10,000 or so records) and webhosting and support. A year. That’s honestly at least $2,000 more than I was expecting.
It would be idiotic to expect these guys to work for free. I don’t. I know they’ve got mortgages, and student loans, and stuff like that. But I think, when they’re just starting out with software people are a bit suspicious of by nature (face it… most people I run into are downright paranoid about the term “open source”) they would catch more business by pricing less than the big boys.
And if they can’t price their product so that libraries can afford them, then what’s the point? If my organization can’t afford it… then they just can’t do it.. The fact is most librarians I have run into would rather sink more money into a name they recognize, then sink $4k a year into something that’s an unknown quantity.
When I asked initially for Discoverstations (open source based PACs) to be implemented in my former place of employment, it was met with resistance. “It’s Linux.” “People won’t understand it.” “What happens when it breaks?” That’s also a product with a fairly hefty price tag on the outset. Grant money was the only way I could get it in there. The thing is: Those were PACs, not a detailed list of the library’s holdings, and the support was hardware support as well: something tangible.
Liblime is dealing with intangibles: software support, and a virtual list of the library’s holdings. Librarians are funnier over their catalog than they are over their public access computers… rightly so. I just think they could have hit a better balance between price versus service. Librarians that don’t see open source as a golden opportunity aren’t going to take the chance on it at that price, though.
And it is a shame. I like Koha a lot. The folks at Liblime seem really cool, and I’m sure their support is great. It’s a tough market to break into. I’m just not sure that the pricing is where I would have set it. I don’t have their financials in front of me. Maybe they’re charging the absolute minimum to keep the lights on. But the fact is, without support from an outside organization, I can not put Koha on the machines where I am now. And we simply can’t afford the service as it stands now, as much as I’d love to use it.
Re:Open Source, For Profit, Nightmare Upgrades?
Why assume a conspriracy if someone says anything negative, I think it’s very likely some pro-OSS comments come from suspect sources as well. Just cause it’s free doesn’t make someone noble.