James Nimmo passed along word from Declan McCullagh that The New York Times inaccurately reported that Assistant Attorney General
Viet Dinh said FBI “agents have contacted about 50 libraries nationwide in
the course of terrorism investigations” (Eric Lichtblau, “Justice Dept.
Lists Use of New Power to Fight Terror,” May 21, 2003). The transcript of
the hearing, below, makes clear that AAG Dinh was speaking of ordinary
criminal cases rather than national security cases. Information on library
contact in national security investigations is provided to Congress in a
classified format, as was also noted in AAG Dinh’s testimony, below:
James Nimmo passed along word from Declan McCullagh that The New York Times inaccurately reported that Assistant Attorney General
Viet Dinh said FBI “agents have contacted about 50 libraries nationwide in
the course of terrorism investigations” (Eric Lichtblau, “Justice Dept.
Lists Use of New Power to Fight Terror,” May 21, 2003). The transcript of
the hearing, below, makes clear that AAG Dinh was speaking of ordinary
criminal cases rather than national security cases. Information on library
contact in national security investigations is provided to Congress in a
classified format, as was also noted in AAG Dinh’s testimony, below:
REP. CHABOT: Can you tell us how many times, if at all, library records
have been accessed under the new FISA standards in the USA PATRIOT Act? And
if they have been so accessed, have the requests been confined to the
library records of a specified person?
AAG DINH: Mr. Chairman, Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, requires the
Department of Justice to submit semi-annual reports to this committee and
also to the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate counterparts on the
number of times and the manner in which that section was used in total. We
have made those reports. Unfortunately, because they occur in the context
of national security investigation, that information is classified.
We have made, in light of the recent public information concerning visits
to the library, we have conducted an informal survey of the field offices,
relating to its visits to libraries. And I think the results from this
informal survey is that libraries have been contacted approximately 50
times, based on articulatable suspicion or voluntary calls from libraries
regarding suspicious activities. Most, if not all of these contacts that we
have identified were made in the context of a criminal investigation and
pursuant to voluntary disclosure or a grand jury subpoena, in that context.
(Transcript, House Subcommittee on the Constitution, May 20, 2003)
Taken from POLITECH — Declan McCullagh’s politics and technology mailing list
————————————————————————-
To subscribe to Politech:
http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Declan McCullagh’s photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/
Like Politech? Make a donation here: http://www.politechbot.com/donate/
Recent Comments