Kuwait News Agency – Kuwait, has a very short blurb that says Iraqi Education Minister Falah Hasan on Sunday said that all school books printed before 2004 were banned to avert the negative ideas of Saddam Hussein’s regime.
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Perhaps I’m unclear on the concept
I was under the impression that American style democracy and freedom were all about allowing ideas, including those with which you do not agree.
Oh, wait. This is the neo-con, right-wing nut, New World Order style of democracy and freedom, isn’t it?
Censorship is bad. It’s bad for everyone; including neo-con, right-wing nut, New World Order advocates. Pity they don’t see that.
Re:Perhaps I’m unclear on the concept
Choosing which textbooks to use with children is a little different than censoring them. The textbooks will still exist! It may make sense for some college-level classes to analyze all the propaganda in the old books, but the kids need modern textbooks.
In short, what you are missing is that left-wingers like to dictate what is in textbooks in this country. In this country, we try to have textbooks that don’t include hate speech, for example. We don’t censor hate speech, we just don’t make school teachers teach it. Makes sense, doesn’t it.
Re:Perhaps I’m unclear on the concept
I beg your pardon, did I also misinterpret the part where right wingers are bringing economic pressure to bear to force textbook publishers to partake in anti-intellectualism? That couple in Texas who do everything they can to have get biblical teachings into science texts, for instance, in place of scientific findings? Not to mention the various movements to outlaw the teaching of evolution over the years, and the more recent movement to have Intelligent Design treated as science.
If we interpret the effort to influence what is published as “dictating what is in textbooks”, we are thinking too simplisticly. Expecting science textbooks to contain factual information that was derived through scientific research is hardly dictating in the context you used the word, whereas a law banning the teaching of evolution clearly is. The same goes for history, and art, and mathematics.
Nor is it dictating to differentiate by ruling that materials for different fields of study be sequestered in textbooks dedicated to each separate field. Religion gets studied as religion, science gets studied as science. These are restrictions that are reasonable as to time, place, or manner.
Moreover, kindly take note that dictating about what goes into textbooks is decidedly lopsided. Right wingers are demanding that science texts be rewritten to be in line with religious precepts, but no left wingers are demanding that the Bible be rewritten to contain evolution. There is no movement afoot to subvert religion to the cause of science by demanding that George Gamow’s cosmology or Quantum Physics or Paleontology be preached from pulpits during Sunday services.
No; how are you supposed to recognize something that you’ve never been taught to recognize? If children are taught how to recognize hatred and why its precepts are so bankrupt, they’d be less likely to be seduced by it when they get older, don’t you think?
What’s going on in Iraq with banning textbooks from the Hussein era is almost certainly revisionism. And I can just bet that any new textbooks are going to printed under a very fat contract by some American publisher.
Re:Perhaps I’m unclear on the concept
“That couple in Texas who do everything they can to have get biblical teachings into science texts, for instance, in place of scientific findings?”
There has been religious people who try to take over the schools for at least 50 years in Texas, back when the Democrats were in charge. It may surprise you to learn that we still teach evolution in our biology classes here in Texas, and there are many, many, many Republicans who disagree with religious nuts. The fundamentalists do scare me, but they haven’t had much effect in the schools, actually.
More to the point of your original post, the religious groups in Iraq who want a say now are not neo-conservatives, or pro-Bush people, but rather more like Islamic fundamentalists. From what I read, they want to make Iraq into a religious state and make the schools into religious schools. This is not good. But going back to all the Sadam textbooks is not good either. Yes, Sadam was a secularist, but also he was not big on telling students the truth.
“how are you supposed to recognize something that you’ve never been taught to recognize? If children are taught how to recognize hatred and why its precepts are so bankrupt, they’d be less likely to be seduced by it when they get older, don’t you think?”
Yes I do, but going back to Sadam’s textbooks would not teach them that. He was full of hatred and forced teachers to teach hatred.
“What’s going on in Iraq with banning textbooks from the Hussein era is almost certainly revisionism.”
Actually, I think most of the educators in Iraq are quite liberal, especially compared to the soldiers, and they are not interested in revisionism. It has been said that the “winners” write history, but in this case the “winners” aren’t the Bush administration or the neo-conservatives, but instead are groups of diverse people in Iraq. And the teachers of Iraq are not stupid. If they saw textbooks that were full of propaganda, don’t you think they would complain to the United Nations?
“And I can just bet that any new textbooks are going to printed under a very fat contract by some American publisher.”
American publishers tend to be very liberal people, so it might just be a good thing for them to get involved. Have you ever heard of the committees that get together and write textbooks for our schoolchildren? They tend to represent a lot of minority interests and tend to be openminded. Don’t diss American publishers so easily. Maybe you would prefer the “alternative” press to be involved. I would too, but I don’t think the religious fanatics in Iraq would go for that.
“Save the easily offended: ban everything.”
I’m not offended by what you say. I just think that forcing Iraqi children to read Sadam’s textbooks isn’t right.
Although it doesn’t say what exactly was taught
perhaps it was also along the lines of the Movementarians in that Simpsons episode.
Mrs. Krabappel: And who can tell me where thunder and lightning come from? Yes, Bart?
Bart: The Leader, ma’am.
Mrs. Krabappel: Very good, Bart! And who invented Morse Code?
Bart: Oh, I should know this one… the.. the Leader?
Mrs. Krabappel: Ah, correct again!
Not that blatent maybe but as historical revisionism is certainly not beyond any democratic country let alone a dictatorship it’s something to be considered.
Of course anything to do with religion, especially from the US should not be given to these children.
Re:Perhaps I’m unclear on the concept
Publishers are liberal primarily in regard to profit. If they were strongly liberal in their principles, then textbooks would not be subject to the censorial influences they are subjected to.
An analogous situation arises with the teachers in Iraq. If you want a model of what Iraq is most likely to become, look to Iran. There are liberals (read: moderates) there as well, but the religious police state continues nonetheless.
It isn’t right, but it is also equally not right to force them to read the new regime’s party line to the exclusion of all else.
“Everything has a place, and everything in its place.”
Condemn Them Sight Unseen?
“… but going back to Sadam’s textbooks would not teach them that. He was full of hatred and forced teachers to teach hatred.”
I would be interested to know if you’ve actually seen any of these supposedly wretched textbooks? And I presume that if you have seen them, you are able to read Arabic or Farsi or whatever language they are in?
You would so easily conclude that Iraqi textbooks published before 2004 were full of hatred, even though prior to our 2003 invasion there were zero Iraqi terrorists? Whatever else Hussein was, he was a secularist and he did not allow the kind of madrases that our ‘friends’ in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan still operate to this day. Your blind acceptance that ‘if it was Hussein’s it must be evil’ sounds like superstitious, magical belief to me.
It will be interesting to find out what all these textbooks are teaching. And to see if a big fat contract is awarded to an American publisher. More interesting still to see if an American publisher is going to produce textbooks for an Islamic fundamentalist state, the new Iraq.
Re:Condemn Them Sight Unseen?
“It will be interesting to find out what all these textbooks are teaching.”
Let me point you to an article in the Harvard International Review, Vol. 26, 2005, entitled “Rewriting the Textbooks: Education Policy in Post-Hussein Iraq” by Tina Wang:
“When Hussein and the Baath party rose to powe .
in the 1970s, the Iraqi education system became one of indoctrination. The clearest proof, by far, is found in the textbooks written during the period. . .
“According to a New York Times article on October 1, 2003, an elementary school teacher at the Tigris School for Girls in Baghdad said of Hussein, ‘We had to include him in every lesson plan or we’d be in trouble with the Baath Party'”. . . .
“Iraqi education bas been limited to government-imposed education practices, which are heavily focused on memorization, recitation, and regurgitation of information. Hussein considered tbe Ministry of Education an important branch of government for the Baath party and used education as a means of ensuring tbe loyalty and obedience of the youth to tbe government, particularly those born after he came to power in 1979”. . . .
“The curriculum left no room for students to develop critical and analytical tbinking skills or to engage in debate and discussions. The creativity and innovativeness of teachers and students have been stifled.”
I think you’ll find, if you do a little reading, that educators worldwide were more than aware of how bad those textbooks were.