Searchy Search Search writes “rferl.org reports Employees of Iraq’s National Library and Archives are struggling to overcome the destruction wrought during the first weeks of the U.S.-led war. Many irreplaceable documents, photographs, maps, and books — some centuries old — were either destroyed in the fighting or were stolen in the rampant looting that followed. A vital part of Iraq’s culture seems to have disappeared forever”
- Next Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States
- Previous Accused library arsonist could see trial date set in Friday meeting
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Donβt Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
so choose… π
2 articles posted on the loss of historical records in Iraq…
Its certainly unfortunate yes. Probably not avoidable unless we hadn’t gone in at all.
If you’re an Iraqi which would you choose? 1. Saddam and records intact. 2. Saddam gone, records destroyed.
Re:so choose…
Suddenly Greg’s pro-choice!
Re:so choose…
I seem to recall you complaining about Republicans doing the run around whenever you approached them about the Cheney/confidentiality issue. Funny you should choose to do the same.
Re:so choose…
Don’t know that Blake did anything funny, but he did SAY something funny. Don’t you get the joke?
Re:so choose…
Apparently not, no idea what he thought I meant, but that joke didn’t work so well.
Re:so choose…
You said choose… I said pro-choice… get it? Not funny? jeesh, tough crowd
Re:so choose…
Believe me I got it. You had a chance to be honest and you copped out. The suddenly-pro-choice ‘joke’ is an old one meant as a red-herring.
I’m more pro-choice than not when it comes to what affects us individually. There are choices when it comes to abortion too. But morally there are fewer choices than there are legal ones.
Re:so choose…
The problem with conservatives is that they cannot possibly understand how their morals aren’t good enough for anybody but themselves. They tend to believe that what they think is good enough for them, so it’s good enough for the other six billion people on the planet as well. They couldn’t even consider how morals are entirely solipsistic.
Another problem with conservatives is that their thinking is too: Either/Or. They do not admit of third possibilities. It would have been possible to oust Hussein without indiscriminately murdering 11 to 15 thousand Iraqi innocents and severely damaging their culture and history. But the Republican National Guard of Amerika wouldn’t allow anyone to explore such alternatives.
Re:so choose…
Riiiight, because we know Canada has the military ability to invade a country without hurting anybody at all.
Now *that’s* funny.
Re:so choose…
False dilemma.
Re:so choose…
Talk about avoidance. You accuse Blake of not answering your directive to choose, then you follow suit with your own misdirection when you dislike what fang face says.
It’s true. We don’t have enough equipment to attack anyone. Canada is better known for peacekeeping than war mongering and I can say I’m proud to be Canadian. I’m glad we didn’t invade Iraq with the US, because god only knows, we wouldn’t have known what to do with all those weapons of mass destruction…
s/
Re:so choose…
I replied to what he said. He seemed to think there was a better way, he didn’t offer a better way but he seemed to think there was one. I simply pointed out that Canada was not likely to have the resources to offer any scenario, better or worse.
1. WMDs are popping up bit by bit. And your right, Canada wouldn’t know what to do with them.
2. The original question makes it very clear that WMDs weren’t the only thing at stake. The whole johnny one-note thing is getting a little tired. There is something bigger going on in the Middle East then just WMDs. Be nice if one of you could admit that.
Re:so choose…
False choice, Greg.
The professionals in the Pentagon told the Bush administration that a much, much larger force was needed, not to defeat Iraq, but to hold it and maintain order _after_ defeating the Iraqi forces. The State Dept. (currently headed by another military professional) provided extensive plans for _how_ to maintain order after military victory. All these warnings and all this prewar planning for the post-war situation was dismissed as obviously wrong by Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush. Everything was going to be love & kisses, with no risk of post-war disorder.
But that was totally contrary to what anyone moderately familiar with history would have expected, and it’s not the way it worked out. With Saddam’s regime destroyed, and with coalition forces in Iraq laughably too small to maintain order, the very predictable (and predicted) rioting & looting broke out.
And Rumsfeld JOKED about it, saying “democracy is messy.”
Listening to the professionals about what was really needed, for the post-war period as well as the fighting, probably wouldn’t have prevented all the post-war destruction, but it could have, at least, greatly limited it.
Being prepared and thus preventing most of the post-war disorder wouldn’t have just prevented the cultural loss (not just to Iraq, remember, but to the whole world; this _is_ the cradle of human civilization), but would also have helped the post-war economic and political rebuilding, things the neocons supposedly care deeply about.
Re:so choose…
No. 1 I agree with Rummy. His primary efforts have been to make the military more efficient. In the 21st century we need a military that is fast and strong, there won’t always be time to move whole armies from here to there. The fact is what we did in Iraq was a milestone in military history.
No. 2 The article specifically refers to the first few weeks of the war. We started by bombing the hell out them. There were no foot soldiers involved. And unless you wanted millions of foot soldiers to all run in at the same time and put everyone in straight jackets than yes, democracy will always be messy. That was the price. It was worth it.
Re:so choose…
Sounds just like the Nazi regime.
All hail the creed of the tyrant: “You can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.”
Little problem with your point of view there, GregS. There is no democracy in Iraq. Iraq is being crushed under the heel of an incompetent occupier who had an occupation government in place, and has installed yet another puppet regime, with yet another American CIA puppet in charge, while beginning to build fourteen bases for even more occupation forces.
Aside from which, I notice that you aren’t over there. Why is that, GregS? Funny thing how the drones always proclaim loudest the benefits of killing any number of innocent civilians as long as they don’t have to do the dirty work, isn’t it?
Those NBC Weapons you mentioned that were coming to light bit by bit; are those part of the non-existent stockpiles Bush lied to the world about, or are they just scraps bought on the black market by the resistance fighters?
Sieg Heil.
Oh, . . . and you know that Canada you’re always sneering at? No revolution, no civil war, and we fought in the First and Second World Wars from the very start to protect democracy while your governments had their collective heads jammed up their collective asses in total confusion.
Re:so choose…
I’d never argue about the lack of Cdn military supremacy. My father is ex-armed forces so I’m quite aware of our country’s shortcomings in that area. So be as sarcastic as you want, cus I agree with you.
So, it wasn’t just WMD? It was the whole oppresive regime/human rights thing? Yeah. Right. Forgive my cynicism in this regard. It was Hussein and the oil Bush was after. The WMD was just a smoke screen for an invasion of Iraq. This is how it looks to this Cdn…and many others here feel the same way. I also know there are some Cdns so brainwashed by American gov’t propaganda that they support the invasion of Iraq.
So, if this wasn’t just for the WMD/Oil/Hussein, then when is the US gonna get to those other oppressive regimes that exist in other countries. Like, oh, Cuba? (C’mon you’ve been trying for years with Cuba, why not invade now that they don’t have the backing of Russia? Should be easier) Or Libya? Insert country/oppressive regime of choice. Ah…wait. Most of those other oppresive regime places don’t have anything that Bush wants.
Still very glad to be Canadian.
s/
Re:so choose… π
Hey, you forgot. We won the war of 1812, too.
s/
BS
The majority of petroleum imports to the United States of America come from Canada.
To say that Iraq was invaded because of oil is an uninformed argument. Iraq ranks behind Canada and Saudi Arabia in terms of proven oil reserves. Iraq ranks much further down when it comes to availability of supply and ease of export.
Security is more the issue than oil. The Security of the Middle East, the security of the Iraqi people, the security of the US were significantly more important than oil.
If it were about oil, perhaps we should invade Canada.
Re:BS
“Let’s look at it simply. The most important difference between North Korea and Iraq is that economically, we just had no choice in Iraq. The country swims on a sea of oil.”
-Paul Wolfowitz
Re:not so much BS
Well according to that article on Iraq you linked to, there is a potential in unexplored areas of the country for more oil.
So, if it’s for security in the middle east, and the middle east area is one of the, if not THE largest oil producing area in the world, then, oil was ONE of the reasons Bush invaded. And I did NOT say it was the ONLY reason, just one of several unjustifiable reasons. As I said, unless the US is going to start toppling other regimes of the ilk of Iraq, don’t tell me it wasn’t for Hussein and the oil. I don’t buy it.
“If it were about oil, perhaps we should invade Canada.”
Ha! You’d only have to invade Alberta. You could leave the rest of us alone. Although if you’re taking Alberta, take Quebec too. You’d soon be begging us to take them both back. *G* Besides, the US tried that almost 200 years ago and couldn’t do it…
I just have to quote Rick Mercer here (brilliant Cdn. political humourist): “Ninety percent of them [Americans] can’t pick out their home town on an unmarked map. … And if they get mad with us, we’ll just have to take our name off the map and feel safe in knowing they will never find us.”
I love Rick Mercer.
s/
Re:so choose… π
I didn’t forget! I was saving it up.
The war of 1812 was probably the first example of American Arrogance of Power. The first dude over the border rode into a town and loudly proclaimed, “I am but the vanguard of much greater force, resistance is futile, you will be assimiliated.”
Well, that’s a paraphrase, but it was an actual event. He basically told the people that conquest was inevitable, so they should lie back and enjoy it. All he did was to tick them off with his attitude.
Just like the war in Viet Nam and the invasion on Iraq, the War of 1812 was based on a spurious excuse. The U.S. invaded supposedly because the Brutish Navy was stopping American ships at sea and pressganging sailors into service, but that practice had been stopped by diplomatic means before the invaders crossed into Ontario.
The American attitude about how their military adventurism hasn’t changed since then either. In 1812, Viet Nam, the Bay of Pigs, Afghanistan, and Iraq, the prevalent misassumption was that the downtrodden would rise up in joyful adoration of liberty and freedom and sweep the invading forces into the capitol and drag the tyrants out of their offices and hang them all from the nearest tree or lamp post.
Boy, some people just never learn the lessons of history.
Re:so choose…
Sad to hear some Canadians actually support the U.S. actions in Iraq.
I only hope all of you in Canada realize that there are a good number of us in the U.S. who not only disagree with what our country’s doing, but are downright ashamed of it. I even live in a very conservative area, and still I know a lot of people who are horrified by our own country’s actions.
Too bad Canada’s too cold for me… otherwise I’d move there myself!
Re:so choose…
I know that there are Americans who disagree with the war in Iraq, and I think many of those Cdns who do support the war realise the same.
Hey, c’mon, we’re only cold 8 to 10 months of the year. Usually. You could go to vancouver or victoria. It almost never snows there in the winter. *G*
s/
Re:so choose…
Yes, south west BC is the place for those of us who fear the winter. We haven’t had a real snow fall in years. It never lasts more than a day or two.
Add to that, the fact that we aren’t going to blindly follow every military adventure some egomaniac of a president wants to engage in and you’ve got a pretty cool place. We have enough problems of our own making but fortunately don’t feel the need to export them. Of course, we don’t think we are the centre of the universe. There are some real advantages to that.