A federal judge Thursday ordered a suburban Atlanta school system to remove stickers in its high school biology textbooks that call evolution “a theory, not a fact,” saying the disclaimers were an unconstitutional endorsement of religion
So says The Associated Press.
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
flip it
“By denigrating evolution, the school board appears to be endorsing the well-known prevailing alternative theory, creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker does not specifically reference any alternative theories,” U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper said.
By pulling the stickers Judge Cooper is saying evolution is fact and is endorsing the religion of atheism.
Read It For Yourself
I wouldn’t expect the decision to open your mind on this issue, but it’s Online Here. That’s a PDF.
For a slightly odd view…
It is only a recent idea that The State should be involved in education at all. I am more in favor of handling such “the old fashioned way” by having the church handle such. Have the state set standards but let the church teach. I have been at religious institutions of education that barely mention creationism outside the religion department and talk about evolution pretty much just in the science department.
Such a thought would at least prevent controversies such as the above judicial matter from erupting I would think!
Re:For a slightly odd view…
When I was young, I’d have been happy to attend a school run by a partnership of Jews and Soto Zen Buddhists but somehow I don’t think that’s what you mean by letting the church teach.
And what about the pagans?
Re:For a slightly odd view…
(tongue in cheek here) Oh yes, the madrasas are helping young Moslems get a well-rounded world view now, aren’t they? So well-rounded, they’d like to round up all us American heathens are send us to a non-existent planet.
Re:Read It For Yourself
Evolution in science textbooks is the norm and has been for some time. So why is it my mind that needs to be opened? Isn’t an established habit a closed door?
The quotes on pg 16 are laughable. No I didn’t read the whole thing (its 44 pages).
Not being a legal scholar the best I can boil down the decision to is the judge’s repeated arguement that the sticker somehow makes those who believe in creationism ‘insiders’ and those who believe in evolution ‘outsiders’. Since the stickers don’t say *anything* about creationism I don’t see how that can be the case. If your a supposed ‘outsider’ there’s a good chance you won’t even know what creationism is and any supposed intent falls by the wayside. So, back to my original arguement. All he did was endorse atheism.
Re:For a slightly odd view…
well now that wasn’t very politically correct
Re:flip it
By pulling the stickers Judge Cooper is saying evolution is fact and is endorsing the religion of atheism.
Wow. It’s not very often that someone calls Pope John Paul II an atheist, or a promoter of “the religion of atheism.”
Creationism doesn’t belong in science class because it’s not science; it’s religion. Evolution does belong there because it is science–as solidly grounded in fact as anything else in science that goes beyond immediate, short-term, visible physical facts. You just can’t teach modern biology in any meaningful way without evolution. It has enormous predictive power in all life sciences research, and it’s because it works that scientists continue to adhere to it, when they’ve long since thrown out Lamarkism and phlogiston.
What evolution doesn’t do is say anything at all about the existence or nonexistance of God, immortal souls, or the afterlife, which is why most Christian denomiations have no problem with it.
Re:flip it
Well, that’ll teach me to forget to close my html tags, fer shure.
Re:flip it
I don’t have a problem with it. Its a nice little theory.
Uh…
By pulling the stickers Judge Cooper is saying evolution is fact and is endorsing the religion of atheism.
Umm atheism actually isn’t a religion, hence the name “a” (without) and “theism” (religion). So, one could argue that the judge actually promotes no religion at all, which is what the government is supposed to do.
Sure, evolution is a theory. But, unlike creationism, it’s a theory grounded in observable fact That’s what science is. Creationism does use some observations to back its arguments, but ultimately relies in that which cannot be proven (some sort of god). And before anyone jumps the fact that we speak of the theory of evolution we also speak freely of the theory of relativity.
Last I checked, there’s no big religious uprising over relativity theory or quantum theory or string theory. Now I have my own theory about why. I think it has something to do with the fact that relativity, quantum, and string don’t seem to openly challenge religious beliefs. Now, in fact, they do challenge religious dogma in some ways. In other ways they back up some religious ideas. I’m not going to get into how, as this really isn’t the place for it, but I don’t see anything like the Scopes Quantum Trial happening anywhere.
Besides, I have no problems with a judge upsetting people who honestly believe that the age of the Earth and the cosmos can be measured in tens of thousands of years.
For a rather nifty philosophical argument regarding creationism, unencumbered by religious and scientific perspectives, check out The Philosophy Gym: 25 Short Adventures in Thinking by Stephen Law. Good stuff there.
More stickers
Here are some more proposed stickers for school textbooks.
Re:More stickers
Do check them out, especially the one about “read the entire textbook, as you will not have a teacher for this class.”
Re:flip it
“Theory” is not word that means to scientists when they’re using it in a scientific context what it means to laypeople when they’re using it in ordinary conversation. Gravitational theory is a theory too, but I suspect you’d think it a bad idea to, on that basis, encourage kids to keep an open mind about the consequences of jumping out a third-floor window.
For scientists, the word “theory” describes an explanatory framework that has an extremely strong grounding in fact, but which is subject to revision if facts are uncovered which aren’t adequately explained by the theory. The word scientists use to mean what laypeople mean by “theory” is hypothesis. Evolution is not, at this point, an hypothesis.
Re:Read It For Yourself
I’m not sure how that would be endorsing atheism. Many people who have a religious belief, also accept the Theory of Evolution. In fact, you could be an athiest, and not accept evolution. They are two different things.
Re:flip it
So why is it necessary to treat this theory any differently than any other scientific theory? We don’t require that Physics books make a note that the Theory of Relativity is a theory and not a fact. We don’t require that our Astronomy books note that the Big Bang theory is just a theory, and not a fact.
Re:flip it
We treat it differently because our primary school science education in this country is so crummy that it has only minimal chance of overcoming the fact that evolution has an emotional impact that other scientific theories don’t, and that emotional impact is politically useful to certain groups.
Re:Uh…
“Umm atheism actually isn’t a religion, hence the name “a” (without) and “theism” (religion). So, one could argue that the judge actually promotes no religion at all, which is what the government is supposed to do.”
To believe in nothing is to believe in something and that philosphy guides that individual’s actions as much as any organized religion would. Which is the point of the entire arguement. When you tell a child where they are from you are, to a point, telling them where they are going. Its what makes this theory or hypothesis or giant guess, the controversy it is, and why other posts about relativity and such are simply silly.
“Besides, I have no problems with a judge upsetting people who honestly believe that the age of the Earth and the cosmos can be measured in tens of thousands of years.”
And I have no problem upsetting people that think we just happened to grow out of a hot puddle.
Re:Uh…
I don’t think telling my kids that they came from their mother’s womb, means that is where they are going back to. If that is where they’re returning to, I am really glad that I’m male.
Re:flip it
1: Evolution is a fact; reactionaries misuse the term theory out of invincible ignorance to misrepresent the state of affairs. Reputable biologists do not dispute the reality of evolution, they are only unsure of the processes by which evolution advances.
2: Enforcing the ChurchState seperation is not an endorsement of the religion of “atheism” or any other religion, it is a matter of maintaining a level playing field.