Sarah writes “A public library patron in Springfield, MO, became loud and belligerent when a librarian refused to help him. The problem? He was speaking to someone else on the cell phone at the time. Dear Abby agrees with her in today’s column (about halfway down the page) : ‘The librarian was within her rights to take the next person in line if the one in front of her was preoccupied. And if the man was belligerent and intimidating, she was also within her rights to have a security guard escort him out.'”
Recent Posts
- Salem librarians report patrons trashing, hiding LGBTQ books in past year September 20, 2024
- Forbes Marketplace: The Parasite SEO Company Trying to Devour Its Host September 19, 2024
- Requests to remove books from public libraries are on the rise in Oregon. September 19, 2024
- Librarians on the Case! Sofie Kelly with a list of mysteries featuring bookish sleuths September 19, 2024
- Under Tennessee’s stricter school library law, some books quietly disappear September 19, 2024
- Prison censorship: Law libraries need Microsoft Word. September 19, 2024
- Why British Library’s open book about cyber hack is so important September 18, 2024
Recent Comments
- Dottie spears on The Black Section at WalMart; Segregating Titles by Subjects’ Skin Color
- Dee on The Black Section at WalMart; Segregating Titles by Subjects’ Skin Color
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
LISNews Archives
- September 2024 (17)
- August 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
cell phones
I find it extremely frustrating that libraries and cashiers and other customer service desks are having to put up signs that say “no cell phone use at the counter”. Shouldn’t that be a given?
And is it only the cell phone generation for whom it doesn’t seem to be intuitive that cell phone conversations of the library are bad form? I don’t see it with older (30+) patrons, but we don’t have that many older patrons in my library.
Been there and done that.
When I worked at a large public library I also took the next person in line if the one in front was in the middle of a cell phone conversation. People sometimes got mad when I’d nicely say, “I’ll help you when you finish your call,” but no one ever complained about me to the higher-ups. How on earth can we conduct a reference interview with someone while they’re deep in conversation with someone else? If they were talking to someone that they walked up with, they (normally) wouldn’t ask us a question while deep in conversation with them.
Okay, I’ll quit ranting now and go take a breather outside. 🙂
Re:cell phones
I saw it with people up into their forties at my library. You would think they’d know better….
The Answer
Here is the answer to the problem
Re:The Answer
The USA/Canada model is interesting, since use of a cell phone jammer is (IIRC) flat-out illegal in the U.S. and, I suspect, Canada. Since emergency services use the same frequencies as cell phones, there’s a good reason for the prohibition.
can you hear me now?
When I worked retail people were always talking on their cell phones when I was cashiering–all ages, all genders. It’s very frustrating to be treated as if you are some sort of non-person like that. I heard of some cashiers (not me!) who would deliberately ring stuff up twice to see if the cell phone talker would catch it. I guess we could try checking out random books to cell phone users (How to Win Friends and Influence People? Etiquette for Dummies?).
Re:cell phones
Do the signs deter anyone? Not at my library they don’t. My last visit I was the captive audience of a cell conversation involving casseroles (the yak-ee was in her early 60s).
Re:can you hear me now?
Totally off topic here, but I’m waiting for the day that the cashiers are too busy with their fascinating cell phone conversations that they can’t be bothered to ring me up. Already it’s tough enough to tear them away from their deep conversations with their co-workers. And never mind “Thank you, have a nice day.” Or eye contact.
Re:can you hear me now?
Not to continue the off-topic-ness, but I was employee of the month a few times and got all sorts of bonuses just because I showed up and did my job in a moderately polite fashion. Retail has very low expectations of their workers. Then again, you only earn $7 an hour! Makes librarian salaries seem like winning the lottery.
Re:The Answer
In fact, in the US it’s also illegal for a private building to intentionally block cell phone coverage by any means, including architectural (eg building a theatre as a big old faraday cage). Interfering with the public airwaves and whatnot.
This is one of the rare points of public policiy on which I will admit I am too ignorant to have a useful opinion. 🙂
Re:The Answer
I think you are right on the other types of jamming you mention but do you have a source that backs up your assertion that it is illegal to block cell phones via architecural means?
Passive Jamming
Article in Slate that suggest that passive jamming is legal (architecural) but that active jamming is illegal.
Brief section of article below, use link above for complete article.
In the United States, actively jamming a cell-phone signal is illegal. The FCC, which is the government agency in charge of regulating the airwaves, has established severe penalties for doing so. If you’re caught at your local restaurant with the SH066PL2A/B, it’s possible you could face an $11,000 fine and a one-year jail term. Possible, but apparently highly unlikely. It seems that the FCC has never charged anyone with this crime, even though the American market is one of the most important when it comes to selling cell-phone jamming equipment. One distributor (who wished to remain anonymous) told me they’ve exported approximately 300 jammers to the United States this year, more than to any other country. The exporter claims that buyers include restaurants, schools (including some universities, which have installed the technology to stop students from wirelessly diddling away on their phones during lectures), and personal users.
According to the FCC, cell-phone jammers should remain illegal. Since commercial enterprises have purchased the rights to the spectrum, the argument goes, jamming their signals is a kind of property theft. But there are countries with less draconian rules. France, for instance, seems to turn a blind eye to the active use of cell-phone jammers in movie theaters, and countries such as China, Russia, and Israel either permit use of these technologies, or are very lax when it comes to enforcing restrictions.
Americans seeking a legal way to jam cell phones can look into “passive” jamming technologies. For instance, lining your office in lead should ensure that no signals get in or out. But if lead is too industrial to suit your décor, a more genteel alternative exists: You could install “magnetic wood” paneling throughout. A Japanese scientist, Hideo Oka, has invented a new kind of building material, saturated with magnetic particles made of nickel-zinc ferrite that supposedly deflect 97 percent of mobile-phone signals.
Re:Passive Jamming 2
There’s no law that regulates shielding against radio signals.
Quote found at http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bin/article_gener ation.asp?article_type=tech&article_path=/technolo gy/tech041226.htm
Good book related to this issue.
The Jerk with the Cell Phone: A Survival Guide for the Rest of Us
cell phones
I think we just need better design functions, and some social training.
If there were an easy way to hold your place in line while you engage in a conversation, I think that people might adopt that. Instead if you’re out of line, you’re often at the back – which of course the people will object to.
Design-wise, I’d like to see the return of phone booths. A nice place to stand/sit, screened off aurally from other people. With or without a land-line for coinage/phone cards.
— Ender, Duke_of_URL
Re:cell phones
The biggest troublemakers with mobile phones I know of tend to be business men (young-ish middle age group) who think the world ought to revolve around their money.
Re: Durango Herald article
I’m not so certain about the windows: a friend of mine lives in an old train station which is covered with a tin roof. You cannot get a signal on your mobile inside the house without nearly leaning out the window.
Re:cell phones
And Superman will still have someplace to change clothes!
s/
doh. passive is legal
You’re correct; I was wrong. I was misremembering an article about potential lawsuits which I can now no longer find. As a recall — and clearly my memory on the topic is not that good — the author was questioning how long passive jamming would remain illegal. But since I can’t find the article, I don’t know from what basis that questioning came. Mea culpa.
What bothers me about the whole thing….
….is that I don’t think the person was a librarian and that misperception is hardly ever, ever corrected!
Re:Been there and done that.
I agree and on the Reference Desk I would do this. However, I assume that this whole thing took place at a circulation desk – that is the only place we would really ever have a “line” such as seems to be described in this case. I will stress again, that the person working at circ, if it was, was NOT a Librarian and no one has corrected this yet again.
Re:The Answer
I personally really do not think that is the solution.
Re:Been there and done that.
I’m the head reference librarian at a medium sized public university (17,000+ students). Before my current job, I did a stint at a neighboring public library for 13 years as a clerk and then later as a librarian. With all due respect, why should it matter whether the person was a clerk or a librarian? Aren’t all library employees entitled to the same level of respect and common courtesy?
By the way, in my 18 years of working in reference departments, I’ve seen PLENTY of lines at the reference desk.
Re:Been there and done that.
Why does it matter whether the staff member involved was a librarian or a library clerk? Does it affect the courtesy issue in the slightest? Would a library clerk, but not the librarian, be obliged to take the cell phone user first? Would the cell phone user be entitled to verbally abuse and intimidate the library clerk, but not the librarian?
Re:What bothers me about the whole thing….
You don’t know that the person involved wasn’t a librarian–your assumption that it was at the circulation desk and not the reference desk is without real foundation, and even if it was the circulation desk, in many libraries every staff member spends some time on the circulation desk.
It’s also irrelevant to the question Dear Abby was addressing–the courtesy issue, and the fact that the patron verbally abused and intimidated the staff member. Regardless of her professional/non-professional status, she clearly did the right thing, and he was clearly, unambiguously in the wrong.
Re:Been there and done that.
No, it doesn’t matter to THIS particular case, except it is just another example that really annoys me of people NOT knowing the difference between the professionals and the non-professionals and who works in the library and what jobs they do, etc….
Re:What bothers me about the whole thing….
The real issue here is not about if the individual was a librarian or rather or not the “librarian” was within their rights to take the next person in line, it is that there is a total disregard for what is acceptable in a library or in everyday society even. We have a no ring and no talking on cell phone policy at our library. The phones must be on vibrate and you may not talk on your phone in the library. How do we enforce? It is really easy; we ask them to walk outside. No one has ever refused and if they did I would then just ask them to leave – period. It is disruptive, rude and socially unacceptable. No one should ever be on their phone and try to interact with someone else at the same time. That is just good manners.