search-engines-web.com asks “How do Librarians resolve the conflict between Exposing Children to certain material and the Intentions behind Banned Book Week?
The newportnewstimes.com Reports Books for children face the most challenges. But such challenges aren’t simply an expression of a point of view, but an attempt to remove materials from public use, which restricts others’ access to them.
“Even if the motivation to ban or challenge a book is well-intentioned, the outcome is detrimental,” said Jenkins. “Censorship denies our freedom as individuals to choose and think for ourselves. For children, decisions about what books to read should be made by the people who know them best – their parents.”
- Next G4techTV – Feature – Libraries Enter Digital Age
- Previous We Need School Libraries and School Libraries Need Librarians!
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
feel for normalcy
…….“For children, decisions about what books to read should be made by the people who know them best – their parents.”
I could not disagree more. The library is one of the first important opportunities to step outside of the limited belief systems of their parents. All children have a feel for “normalcy� based on how they were raised and the core beliefs and values of their parents. Growing up is getting outside that feel and replacing it with experience, knowledge and adventure.
This is how a child grows up to find his “own voice� and his own sense of self. Otherwise, the child becomes a “chip off the old block�. That is how inter generational abuse travels. Libraries represent a knowledge base that is “not their parents�. Thats a good thing.
Fifty percent of parents are below average intelligence.
Re:feel for normalcy
The library is one of the first important opportunities to step outside of the limited belief systems of their parents.
That is, without a doubt, one of the more profound things I’ve ever read here on LISNews. And since we have some of the most intelligent people I’ve ever known, like Jessamyn and Walt, that’s really saying something.
Every so often we get a few people in with their kids and you just look at the parents with wonder thinking “My god, who allowed these people to breed?” A co-worker lamented the fate of a child whose parents had the combined IQ of a bag of rocks. She bemoaned how the child had no chance in life because, look who she had to teach her. I jumped in with my own comment (naturally) and stated “Hey, at least they’re smart enough to bring her to the library on a regular basis.”
I’m extremely open to new ideas and new modes of thought. And I realize that some of my beliefs may be controversial, unprovable, or just plain damn wrong sometimes. I hope to at least instill in my own child that it is a sign of true wisdom when you’re able to reverse yourself and your beliefs when faced with strong evidence against them. But like any collector of information, I tend to keep stuff around that supports a certain side of something. I don’t own a single book by Ann Coulter. Why? Because I think she’s a tremendous psycho hose bitch. But I hope to be intelligent enough that, if my son wants to see the conservative side of an issue, I can go take him to the library and get it for him. Course, by the time he starts getting politically curious Ann Coulter will probably have long faded out to be replaced by another psycho hose bitch.
Re:feel for normalcy
“Fifty percent of parents are below average intelligence.”
My Dad has a 7th grade education. I’ll trust his judgement long before I trust anybody who thinks they have “superior” judgement just because they are “educated”.
The entire premise of your arguement is that libraries are an opportunity to undermine a parent’s influence and that is the most honest arguement I’ve heard from the liberal end of this board to date. Please, please, please keep making it, you have no idea how much it helps my side.
Re:Please, please, please
“Please, please, please keep making it, you have no idea how much it helps my side.“
What’s your side on this?
Re:Please, please, please
The small ‘c’ conservative side that has no trouble pulling books based on content and age appropriatness.
Children’s books
In today’s politically charged and motivated society it is hard to tell whether something is good for children or advancing an agenda. Children are very impressionable and with so many opportunities in society to experiment with harmful substances and behaviors raising a child is more difficult than a generation ago. If a library is a place where children can break free from parental philosophical and reading parameters what is the message. Can a 10 year old really develop clear and productive reading habits on their own, which is implied. Suppose a family has a strong religious philosophy which does not negate society but also teaches a system of values, the child may read materials that give fuel for rebellion and asperation for unhealthy lifestyles due to their lack of maturity. Maturity is an essential element in evaluating what is healthy and what is not. I am not saying that people shouldn’t have the freedom to write what they want. I am only saying that giving an immature mind adult choices is dangerous and unfair to the child. Could there be agenda hidden in having immature children see other philosophies? I don’t know, but as someone once told me, ” you don’t go into a hospital ward to see how healthy you are.” A mature mind is better equipped than a child.
Great Minds Don’t Think Alike
It’s Turner & Great Western Dragon Vs. GregS* & Eli! Good Vs. Evil, right Vs. wrong!
Both sides have raised some good points. One side says let the kids decide, it’s actually good for them to read something ma & pa might not approve of, it’s our job to provide just about everything for them to read. The other side says children are very impressionable & immature and it’s our job to pull books based on content and age appropriateness.
I raise the same question every time this comes up, who can we decide what’s appropriate? There are people who think Harry Potter is inappropriate, there are others who feel the same about the Bible, who gets to decide? There is less gray area here than I first imagined, as many books will fall into this area where someone would say burn it, and someone else would say required reading. When we (as librarians) start to get into the business of deciding what’s best for the children we all lose. I don’t know how such decisions can be made that would make everyone happy, I doubt that’s possible, but to error on the side of caution begins to sound like censorship to me. I’m just glad I’m not working in a public library and faced with such decisions!
Just dig back in the censorship topic archives here, look at the books that have been challenged and ask yourself, is this something that should be taken off the shelves “for the children?” My guess is there’d be much disagreement.
Re:Great Minds Don’t Think Alike
Eh, I hate to see it come down to an “us vs. them” mentality. I feel no special sympathy towards liberals or conservatives. Like Bogart said in Casablanca when asked if he had no sympathy for the fox and he replied that he understood the point of view of the hound. I can see where some people believe that books should be pulled due to issues with age appropriateness and the like. Should a five year old be reading Laurell K. Hamilton? Probably not, after all sex and vampires aren’t exactly appropriate reading material for that age. But that’s my belief and there’s probably more than a few people out there who’d agree and more than a few who disagree.
However, my job as a librarian is not to force my beliefs on other people. My job, and I believe, my ethical standing, says let the reader decide what’s appropriate and if the reader is a child, then let the parent decide what’s appropriate. I was reading Agatha Christie novels in grade school. (Poirot is the MAN.) The school librarian hated that. She thought I should be reading Ramona books or stuff by Blume. Yeah I enjoyed Blume, but I really like Christie as well. And it was my mom and dad’s decision that dictated that it was okay for me to read Poirot novels if I wanted to. After all, my parents bore the responsibility to raise me, not the librarian.
The original argument that a book on sex doesn’t belong in a high school doesn’t hold water since I, and almost everyone I knew, went through high school in an almost crusading attempt to get laid. Teens have sex on their minds just like they have sports and fashion on their minds. And if they’re going to be thinking about it, I think it’s our job as librarians to provide them access to concise and unbiased information about it. At the very least we should have both sides of the argument represented in a collection. For every book on having sex, there should be one which favours abstaining. If they’re thinking about it, it should be available. You won’t find many books by Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, or Al Franken in most high school libraries. Why? Because most teens really don’t care much about current politics. Though if, by some chance, you work for a school where a lot of teens do care about such things, those books should be around.
I take exception when a parent says “This isn’t appropriate for children!” and waves around a complaint form. See it may not be appropriate for their child. Hell it may not be appropriate for my child. But ya know something, bucko, I’ll make that decision, thank you very much. I don’t need some other parent I don’t even know telling me that a book isn’t good for my kid. I’ll raise my child, you raise yours and leave the poor librarians out of this. You may not want your kid to have Pepsi, but dammit, don’t stop my kid from buying it if I say it’s okay.
Re:Great Minds Don’t Think Alike
Is that supposed to be who should decide or how can we decide? I suppose the answer is the same either way. We as librarians make the initial decision by reading reviews and being familiar with our collection. However there are checks and balances in the form of Trustees for public library and a school board for schools.
The boards themselves can and should question what the *focus* of collection development should be. Occasionally we do let our own biases slip in and we find ourselves stocking up on materials that only cover one side of the issue. One non-political example would be the fact that I buy a small fraction of Mac computer books compared to Windows books. Less even then the percentage of Macs sold compared to Windows computers. If somebody complained that they had a Mac but found no Mac books on the shelf that would be a legitimate complaint.
Then there is the general public who has every right to challenge any book purchased by the library in the same way they can challenge how money is spent by any local government body. At that point it comes down to number of challenges per book. We hear Harry Potter gets challenged a lot but that’s because of its popularity. How many times does it get challenged in the individual communities, how many people are actually upset its there? 1? or 100? Probably 1 or 2. In most cases the board is going to review the challenge and throw it out as silly. In a case like Gurlz, which we’ve been talking about in another thread, as word gets out on its excessive detail then its possible that within a single community there are going to be a lot more people calling the Board and asking why that book is in a collection for young adults and possibly pre-adolescents.
Feel for Normalcy
Blake I think I am saying more then your nutshell that “its good for kids to read things mom and pop disapprove ofâ€?…..and I do not agree that it is reduced to “what side are you onâ€?…If there is a side I am on it is the “kids sideâ€?
here is my quote
�Libraries represent a knowledge base that is “not their parents�. Thats a good thing. “
This means the possibility of exposure to literature, information and a world view that is not part of their parents life. Consider being born into an environment where poverty, English as a second language, abuse, addiction , general ignorance, crime, and general anti social behaviour …to mention a few are the prevailing conditions..
If you are a child of a family containing any of those elements and they express themselves de-constructively ….then you are behind a big 8 ball.
It is about “going beyond ones parents biases and limitations� Expanding the childs “feel for normalacy� which is essential when “skewed�. It is a much bigger subject than censorship and will continue to be so long after this culturally polarized moment of “sides�. “Sides� is a red herring with respect to the issue of “going beyond “ parental bias.
I’m saying the library plays (can play) an important role of access to “new ideasâ€? that can be chosen by a child. It need not “undermine parentsâ€? but I concede that it may well do so in some cases.
And when it does it might be a “good thing� for the development of the child.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
I agree with about 90% of that but saying this:
“Consider being born into an environment where poverty, English as a second language, abuse, addiction , general ignorance, crime, and general anti social behaviour …to mention a few are the prevailing conditions..”
Is much different than saying this:
“The library is one of the first important opportunities to step outside of the limited belief systems of their parents.”
Re:feel for normalcy …I don’t get many of those. Here is a situation you might think about.
Thanks for the compliment
Suppose you are Anne Coulters daughter….
How do you develop your own point of view….do you ask Anne to go and get you a book ?
Or do you choose your own ? What do you do? How do you find your own voice.?
How do you avoid becoming an Anne clone? Would Anne “let goâ€? and not require her child to support her world view ? What would the childs feel for normalcy be? Imagine that… a little “psycho hose something or other”
Rhetorical questions…sure…but I’m pretty sure the Anne is not part of the answer and a library would probably be involved.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
Greg wrote�
Is much different than saying this:
“The library is one of the first important opportunities to step outside of the limited belief systems of their parents.”
No Greg
It is exactly the same. I just described them in terms that were graphic and obvious.
There are more subtle versions that have the same relationship to a child “finding his own voice�.
Examples:
Superstitious parents raising children with superstition as a as a feel for normalcy.
Military families raising children with the military as a feel for normalcy.
Liberal families raising children with liberal values as a feel for normalcy.
Conservative families raising children with conservative values as a feel for normalcy.
Holly Jihad families raising children with Holy Jihad values as a feel for normalcy
All of these are values brought on by an accident of birth. From the point of view of /her own voice they are limitations.
a child’s growth and development and finding “his
They are all less than what is possible and none of them have been chosen by the child.
The library is often the first start of “sensing other possibilities�. Sensing other possibilities is the first step in “finding your own voice�. Finding your own voice does not necessarily “undermine “ parental value� but it sometimes does. It definitely alters it
Thats evolution.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
“Superstitious parents raising children with superstition as a as a feel for normalcy.
Military families raising children with the military as a feel for normalcy.
Liberal families raising children with liberal values as a feel for normalcy.
Conservative families raising children with conservative values as a feel for normalcy.
Holly Jihad families raising children with Holy Jihad values as a feel for normalcy”
The fact that you list those things as being equivalent is a little scary.
There are two things going on here:
1. A parent’s purpose is to raise a child with a certain of values to prepare them to experience the outside world. It is inevitable that a child will see things that go against their belief system. The purpose of that belief system is to deal with that very experience. This is what I see wrong with that statement.
2. There are times, all too often, when a parent fails that, even abuses it. Issues like abuse and addiction are certainly oppurtunities for libraries to offer an alternative view or even views on how to deal with the situation. Poverty as an issue is an oppurtunity for anyone regardless of age to use the library.
There is a distiction between those two and it is part of a librarian’s job as well as patrons to find an acceptable medium between them.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
Well Greg
Were getting closer to being on the same page but not quite yet….
The “scary equivocationsâ€? have one common denominator …they are belief systems the child was born into …one set of them is gross and obvious…the other set is subtle and can be taken for granted…but none of them are of the child’s creation…
So bearing in mind what I am bringing to the table is the idea of a child moving past imposed beliefs and into his/her own voice as they grow into adulthood and eventually have “their own� belief system based upon their knowledge and experience and the nature of their philosophy.
This is the key. Their “own voice� This is what good writers, artists philosophers and
all round “interesting people� acquire.
I disagree that there is any one thing that parents do and that there is a singularity of purpose parents have that you describe. Parents do a great number of different things.
I do agree that some parents do what you describe and give their children advantages.
However, half of them perform their tasks (what ever they are) below average…by statistical definition.
I have no clue how this fits into the librarians job description.
I am making the point that for many children the library is the first accessible point
where a process of gathering alternative points of view can “kick in� in a constructive way. It is a place where a child can choose what interests them. I think this is important.
Not everyone does. Some find the concept threatens their belief system.
There are of course nonconstructive places for youth to get an alternative world view. But that is an other story.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
I was tempted to agree with a lot of what you said but that’s the problem with this type of philosophy, its very tempting. After reading this segment again however, I came to my senses:
“So bearing in mind what I am bringing to the table is the idea of a child moving past imposed beliefs and into his/her own voice as they grow into adulthood and eventually have “their ownâ€? belief system based upon their knowledge and experience and the nature of their philosophy.
This is the key. Their “own voice� This is what good writers, artists philosophers and
all round “interesting peopleâ€? acquire.”
I’m reminded of the only Woody Allen movie I think I’ve seen beginning to end called ‘Bullets Over Broadway.’ The philosphical core of that movie is that artists, true artists, cannot be inhibited by the same moral code as regular men. They have to break the rules in order to understand them. To me that is an excuse for behavior without consequences.
A child can grow up to have different ideas about things then their parents. He can appreciate jazz even though the parents only listen to classical, he can love Monet even though there are only Picasso’s (prints) hanging at home. But a belief system, a moral code, a view of right and wrong, should be something that lasts throughout his lifetime.
As for this statement:
“However, half of them perform their tasks (what ever they are) below average…by statistical definition”
I strongly disagree with. You can’t quantify a parent’s role. That’s simply not mathematically possible.
Re:Feel for Normalcy …..What an interesting comment to bring to the table. You might have missed something significant about that movie. Woody Allen is a comedian, he plays a hopeless neurotic. He is trying to make you laugh. It is not serious. He is literaly a clown.
“They have to break the rules in order to understand them. To me that is an excuse for behavior without consequences. “
Ironically, I don’t think there is “behavior with out consequencesâ€?.
Consequences are the fundamental tool of Early Childhood Education.
Doubly ironic…
Woody Allen created terrible consequences for himself when he broke the rules and it was revieled he was having sex with his underage step daughter.
Back to the point
I’m not exactly talking about breaking rules here Greg…more like wandering through a library picking out a book and discovering a “new worldâ€?…. seems like an important library function….
“But a belief system, a moral code, a view of right and wrong, should be something that lasts throughout his lifetime. “…
probably true but first you have to acquire one….upon acquisition perhaps that might be called “your own voiceâ€?.
Re:Feel for Normalcy
“Woody Allen created terrible consequences for himself when he broke the rules and it was revieled he was having sex with his underage step daughter.”
Actually he didn’t, he’s still more famous then infamous and has no trouble getting big box office names to star in his movies. And while he is a comedian he is not a clown. He is considered an artist for pointing out the truth in a funny way. I agreed with his view only in that is how some artists think, not thats how it should be.
““But a belief system, a moral code, a view of right and wrong, should be something that lasts throughout his lifetime. “…
probably true but first you have to acquire one….upon acquisition perhaps that might be called “your own voiceâ€?.”
Over at captaincomics.us this is what they like to call a ‘horserace’. You think a belief system is acquired, I think it is given.
Re:Feel for Normalcy …you do not have your own voice …
If it is given
you have the voice of the “giver”
that is the point!
Re:Feel for Normalcy
your own voice should not be hinged upon your belief system