Someone sent in This NYTimes Story on the final arguments that were made in Philadelphia challenging the Children\’s Internet Protection Act of 2000.
This article says that CIPA is no more a threat to free speech than current regulations on television and radio, and the plaintiffs, along with the Supreme Court, are drawing the wrong analogy. Online content is much more like information in the broadcast media, which the Supreme Court ruled in 1978 can be regulated because of the \”pervasive\” nature of broadcasting.
Of course, a bit more From The ALA
Recent Comments