August 2000

Monday Studio B Buzz Highlights

Zzzzzzzz… Yo, it\’s Monday, and today\’s highlights include an expected increase in book sales, what the California energy crisis is doing to bookstores, and selling used books for fun and profit (mostly profit). Get thee the buzz! Or at least the highlights….

Zzzzzzzz… Yo, it\’s Monday, and today\’s highlights include an expected increase in book sales, what the California energy crisis is doing to bookstores, and selling used books for fun and profit (mostly profit). Get thee the buzz! Or at least the highlights…. * 5% Increase in book sales expected in 2000
PublishersWeekly.com: August 28, 2000. According to the Book Industry Study Group Trends 2000, book sales are expected to be $24.71 billion in 2000, that\’s an increase of 5.2% percent over last year. Thanks to Harry Potter, the greatest increase is predicted for children\’s books. The college segment will account for the second highest increase with $3.38 billion, or 8.1%. By 2004, the BISG expects that
annual book sales will be more than $30 billion.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/articles/20000828_89823.asp

* Energy crisis in San Diego
BookWeb.org: August 25, 2000. Deregulation of the California\’s electric utilities has left booksellers in the San Diego area feeling burned and trying to find ways to cope with energy bills as much as three times higher than
last year. Some are reducing lighting and computer usage,
while others are actually closing additional days.
http://www.bookweb.org/news/btw/3610.html

* $670,000 raised by selling used books
Contra Costa Times: August 26, 2000.
Nonprofit groups have discovered the value of used books to raise money. Goodwill Industries raised $670,000 in 1999 by selling second-hand books. One library group is also selling on the Internet, \”I just sold a Paul Theroux to a doctor in Japan. He paid seventeen bucks plus freight for a book we would have sold on the table for fifty cents.\”
http://www.contracostatimes.com/biztech/stories_bizwire/346053l.htm

Progressive Librarians Guild

Progressive Librarians Guild, an affiliate organization of the Social Responsibilities Round Table of the American Library Association, was formed in January 1990 by a group of librarians concerned with our profession\’s rapid drift into dubious alliances with business and the information industry, and into complacent acceptance of service to the political, economic and cultural status quo.


The development of public libraries was spurred by popular sentiment which held that real democracy requires an enlightened citizenry, and that society should provide all people with the means for free intellectual development. Current trends in librarianship assert that the library is merely a neutral mediator in the information marketplace and a facilitator of a value-neutral information society.


Members of PLG do not accept this notion of neutrality, and we strongly oppose the commodification of information. We will help to dissect the implications of these powerful trends, and fight their anti-democratic tendency.

Progressive Librarians Guild, an affiliate organization of the Social Responsibilities Round Table of the American Library Association, was formed in January 1990 by a group of librarians concerned with our profession\’s rapid drift into dubious alliances with business and the information industry, and into complacent acceptance of service to the political, economic and cultural status quo.


The development of public libraries was spurred by popular sentiment which held that real democracy requires an enlightened citizenry, and that society should provide all people with the means for free intellectual development. Current trends in librarianship assert that the library is merely a neutral mediator in the information marketplace and a facilitator of a value-neutral information society.


Members of PLG do not accept this notion of neutrality, and we strongly oppose the commodification of information. We will help to dissect the implications of these powerful trends, and fight their anti-democratic tendency.
PLG recognizes that librarians are information workers, communications workers, and education workers, as well as technical workers. Like workers in every sector, our work brings us up against both economic and political issues. Cataloging, indexing, acquisitions policy and collection development, the character of reference services, library automation, library management, and virtually every other library issue embody political value choices. PLG members aim to make these choices explicit, and to draw political conclusions.

PLG\’s Commitment


Progressive Librarians Guild is committed to the following:


  • to provide a forum for the open exchange of radical views on library issues

  • to conduct campaigns to support progressive and democratic library activities locally, nationally and internationally

  • to support activist librarians as they work to effect changes in their own libraries and communities

  • to bridge the artificial and destructive gaps between school, public, academic and special libraries, and between public and technical services

  • to encourage debate about prevailing management strategies adopted directly from the business world, to propose democratic forms of library administration, and to foster unity between librarians and other library workers

  • to consider the impact of technological change in the library workplace and on the provision of library services

  • to monitor the professional ethics of librarianship from a perspective of social responsibility

  • to facilitate contacts between progressive librarians and other professional and scholarly groups dealing with communications worldwide

The web site contains information about their activities, their publication, Progressive Librarian, their email discussion list, a collection of documents and information about how to join.

The instant library

The Detroit Free
Press
has a typical story on how great the web is
for education.

\”Students say it\’s easier to do research on the
Internet than in the library, where they say they have to
struggle with confusing reference cards and outdated
books. Parents also don\’t have to worry about taking
their kids to the library. \”

The Detroit Free
Press
has a typical story on how great the web is
for education.

\”Students say it\’s easier to do research on the
Internet than in the library, where they say they have to
struggle with confusing reference cards and outdated
books. Parents also don\’t have to worry about taking
their kids to the library. \”
More from Free Press

even teachers can get help with homework. The site
offers lesson plan ideas, classroom activities, site
reviews and educational news.

\”I\’m getting the Internet installed now,\” said Irene
Merritt, who teaches eighth grade math at Taft Middle
School on Detroit\’s west side. \”I plan to use it for help
with lesson plans and to find out easier ways of
teaching certain subjects.\”


Benjamin Dirden, a social studies teacher at Detroit
Redford High School, already uses the Internet for help
with lesson plans.

\”Just about any educational site that you pull up has a
link to lessonplans.com,\” he said.

Fargo library director talks about his behavior

In-Forum.com has an Interview with Fargo Public Library Director
Dave Davis. If you haven\’t heard the full story, they also
have a summary that will bring you up to speed.

\”During a library meeting March 1, Davis told
employee Cynthia Wray, who was eight-months
pregnant: “I just can’t stand looking at you … with your
hands like that you look like you’re stuffed.” He then
turned his back on her. Davis later apologized after
being told to do so. \”

In the interview he
says:
Has it been difficult for you to
communicate with the employees?


\”Not to my knowledge it hasn’t. It’s show time. My
mother raised me to be a gentleman … and my wife
expects me to be a gentleman, too. Besides, I’ve found
in life I don’t hold grudges. That’s just not a Dave Davis
personality. \”

In-Forum.com has an Interview with Fargo Public Library Director
Dave Davis. If you haven\’t heard the full story, they also
have a summary that will bring you up to speed.

\”During a library meeting March 1, Davis told
employee Cynthia Wray, who was eight-months
pregnant: “I just can’t stand looking at you … with your
hands like that you look like you’re stuffed.” He then
turned his back on her. Davis later apologized after
being told to do so. \”

In the interview he
says:
Has it been difficult for you to
communicate with the employees?


\”Not to my knowledge it hasn’t. It’s show time. My
mother raised me to be a gentleman … and my wife
expects me to be a gentleman, too. Besides, I’ve found
in life I don’t hold grudges. That’s just not a Dave Davis
personality. \”
More from In-Forum
A consultant was then hired to assess library
operations under Davis. In a July report, the consultant
said Davis needs to improve poor management and
communication skills and be held accountable for his
work at the library, if he stays on the job.

The consultant’s report was much different than the
annual evaluation given Davis by two top Library Board
members, who in the spring said he was performing
satisfactorily, although he should stop his poor
attempts at humor.

The Fargo city attorney issued an opinion that the
remarks by Davis did not constitute sexual harassment.
And there apparently are no grounds for his dismissal;
Davis’ employment is subject to Civil Service
procedures.

During the summer, Schneider and the city talked about
terms of a buyout that would allow Davis to resign.
The latest proposal on the table, reported in Saturday’s
Forum, was made by Schneider. The city has until noon
Tuesday to respond to it.

Under the terms of that proposal, Davis would receive
one year’s pay. If he tried and failed to find a suitable
job as a managing librarian and couldn’t, he would
continue to be paid for up to one additional year in
addition to the terms of his original offer, which said:
– The city would have to pay about $10,000 in attorney
fees.

– The city would be responsible for $6,000 in relocation
expenses.

– Davis would get two years of health and retirement
benefits from the city.

– Mayor Bruce Furness would be required to send an
open letter to The Forum that points to Davis’ annual
evaluation as being generally positive and that the city
had no cause to fire him. The letter would state that the
resignation was in the library’s best interest, given the
controversy.

40th anniversary of library sit-ins marked

Charleston.net has a Story on the sit ins that started On July
16, 1960. On Sept. 19, 1960, the library was integrated.

\”\”All we wanted was to use a public library that
our parents worked hard to help pay for,\” said Margaree
Crosby, who was among the eight arrested, handcuffed
and taken to the city jail for holding a sit-in at the
whites-only library on North Main Street 40 years
ago.\”

Charleston.net has a Story on the sit ins that started On July
16, 1960. On Sept. 19, 1960, the library was integrated.

\”\”All we wanted was to use a public library that
our parents worked hard to help pay for,\” said Margaree
Crosby, who was among the eight arrested, handcuffed
and taken to the city jail for holding a sit-in at the
whites-only library on North Main Street 40 years
ago.\”
\”It was really scary being fingerprinted,\” Wright said.
     Jackson said it marked the first time he had been
arrested, and he found the experience both exhilarating
and frightening.
     \”Nothing on the outside changed, but something
within us changed,\” he said. \”When we changed our
minds, everything changed. Our demands changed,
our aspirations changed, our dreams changed.\”
     A lawsuit was filed and the students took their battle
to court.
     On Sept. 19, 1960, the library was integrated after the
Greenville City Council decided it should be reopened
after closing for two weeks following several sit-ins.
    
    

Library union OKs pact

The Final Story in the
librarian strike saga (Hopefully).

\”The members
of District 925 of the Service Employees International
Union had approved the three-year tentative agreement,
89-3. “Oh my goodness, that makes me really happy,”
said Library Director Nan Johnston, who was notified of
the tally by telephone.\”


Back to work at last.

Strikers Not Sure What to Expect

The Canton
Rep
is Now Reporting the strike
may not be quite as over as we once thought.

“This could be the ‘Dewey beats Truman’
headline of the day,” assistant Library Director Marge
Baker said early Friday afternoon, referring to the
infamous Chicago Tribune headline that appeared after
the 1948 presidential election.\”

The Canton
Rep
is Now Reporting the strike
may not be quite as over as we once thought.

“This could be the ‘Dewey beats Truman’
headline of the day,” assistant Library Director Marge
Baker said early Friday afternoon, referring to the
infamous Chicago Tribune headline that appeared after
the 1948 presidential election.\”
More from the Canton Rpublican
At 5 p.m., Larry Morgan, lead negotiator for the library
and superintendent of the Stark County Educational
Service Center, received confirmation of the agreement,
Baker said. She said she expects to get a copy of the
initialed agreement before the union membership
votes on the pact at 2 p.m. today.


Now, it’s the striking workers who are nervous.


About 120 SEIU members walked off the job July 31,
demanding a 3-year contract with a 6-percent raise the
first year and 5-percent increases the next two years.
The union also wanted a fair-share clause that would
require all bargaining unit members to pay
assessment fees to support the union.

The library had offered 4-percent raises and resisted
fair share.


Union leaders remained tight-lipped about the
contract’s contents, and pickets said they don’t know
what to expect at today’s ratification meeting.

Filtering Follies

I couldn\’t resist posting this article from the Digital Freedom Network. Does your name contain a vulgarity? If so, read on…

\”Babcock and Engineer are not the only ones who have been blocked by online filters. People named Dickinson, Sussex, Cummings, and Assisi have also been blocked.\”

I couldn\’t resist posting this article from the Digital Freedom Network. Does your name contain a vulgarity? If so, read on…

\”Babcock and Engineer are not the only ones who have been blocked by online filters. People named Dickinson, Sussex, Cummings, and Assisi have also been blocked.\”

\”In a new twist on Internet censorship, Los Angeles attorney Sherril Babcock was blocked from joining the BlackPlanet.com online service — at least until she changed her name.\”

\”When Babcock registered for access to BlackPlanet.com, a New York-based Web site dealing with African-American topics, she was told that her last name was \”unacceptable,\” presumably because it contained the word \”cock,\” and she was not permitted to register. Suspecting the matter to be a problem with the site\’s filtering technology, she contacted BlackPlanet.com to clear up the problem. She explained that \”Babcock was my father\’s name as well, and I am very fond of him.\”

\”Crystal Martin, BlackPlanet.com\’s Moderator for Member Services, responded. She apologized twice for the inconvenience, but said \”unfortunately, the letters that form the word \’Cock\’ is [sic] unacceptable and will not be recognized by our system.\”

\”CompuServe employee Manesh Engineer sympathizes with Babcock\’s plight. On most Web sites, he is unable to register his name because his last name is a reserved word. \”I guess they\’re afraid that I will pose as an engineer for the company or something,\” he complained to me after hearing about Babcock\’s situation. \”A lot of times when I order products online, sites will refuse my name even on credit card purchases!\” Engineer continued. \”And I can\’t change my user name for those purchases because then my changed name conflicts with the actual name on the card and the credit companies see that as an invalid transaction!\”

Babcock and Engineer are not the only ones who have been blocked by online filters. People named Dickinson, Sussex, Cummings, and Assisi have also been blocked, as well as scholars who publish studies on international terrorism, gay rights activists who write about AIDS, conservatives who criticize gay rights activists, and journalists who write articles on crime. All are victims of technology that tries to keep harmful material out of the hands of children but instead gives them a dangerously false sense of security.

\”Filtering software is no substitute for parental discretion. Unfortunately, most users of filtering software fail to realize just how subjective and inaccurate filtering software is. Censorware makers use secret criteria to ban Web sites. They refuse to disclose their lists of blocked sites, disclosing only broad categories about what types of sites are blocked. Most of the manufacturers allow people to type in a Web site address to see if it\’s censored and suggest addresses that should be blocked or unblocked. But the review process is imprecise and biased. Last May, the Internet freedom group Peacefire discovered that small personal home pages containing \”objectionable\” material were blocked while the Web sites of large well-funded organizations, from which the material was taken verbatim, were unblocked. By refusing to disclose their list of blocked sites, the manufacturers prevent parents and other users from knowing what is truly being censored.\”

Gooooooogle Growing Up

SF Gate has a Story on Google that is quite interesting. The founders are 27 and now employ 120 people!

“Our goal is to build the ultimate search engine,\’\’ said Larry Page, Google\’s chief executive and co-founder. “We think that we can make search engines better every month, and I don\’t see that ending anytime soon.\’\’

SF Gate has a Story on Google that is quite interesting. The founders are 27 and now employ 120 people!

“Our goal is to build the ultimate search engine,\’\’ said Larry Page, Google\’s chief executive and co-founder. “We think that we can make search engines better every month, and I don\’t see that ending anytime soon.\’\’ More from SFGATE

\”Google\’s popularity is based on providing particularly relevant results to user queries. The company usually ranks near the top in studies of search-engine quality. Like many others, Google\’s search engine relies on software that retrieves Web pages based on word placement and headlines. But it also includes a proprietary technology called PageRank that retrieves Web pages based on the number and quality of other Web pages that point to it.


Another lure is Google\’s simplistic design that is unusual for all the blank white space. The sparseness helps it download faster than most search engines, so much so that the company gloats by displaying for users the time it takes to respond to every query.


“In many ways, it harks back to the original image of search engines,\’\’ said Wit Andrews, an Internet industry analyst with the Gartner Group, a market research company in Stamford, Conn.

Texas Law Review on Filtering

Someone writes \”I would like to suggest a link to a 40-page article on Internet filtering from the April 2000 issue of the Texas Law Review:
\”The First Amendment\’s Limitations on the Use of Internet Filtering in
Public and School Libraries: What Content Can Librarians Exclude?\”


The article concludes that the First Amendment permits filters to be used
by a library if the supervising librarian would have the same degree of
control over the filter that it would have over a library employee with
respect to correcting improper content selection decisions to prevent
unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination

Someone writes \”I would like to suggest a link to a 40-page article on Internet filtering from the April 2000 issue of the Texas Law Review:
\”The First Amendment\’s Limitations on the Use of Internet Filtering in
Public and School Libraries: What Content Can Librarians Exclude?\”


The article concludes that the First Amendment permits filters to be used
by a library if the supervising librarian would have the same degree of
control over the filter that it would have over a library employee with
respect to correcting improper content selection decisions to prevent
unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination. Furthermore, it finds that the
Amendment permits a library to filter out those categories of content it
would have the discretion to reject if someone offered to donate such
content to the library in hard copy form together with funds to cover the
costs of storing it.


A PDF file of an updated version of the article is available from:
papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=230834 \”