Christian students and their parents protested at a Fairfax County, Virginia high school Thursday.
“There’s hope, there’s redemption, and you could live a heterosexual lifestyle,” King said. “That you don’t have to live that lifestyle.”
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
>Librarians have told the
>Librarians have told the students that the books they want to >donate aren’t well-researched and some might make homosexual >students “feel inferior.”
What if the current books make the christian students feel inferior?
They read from books that offend Christians
They read from books that offend Christians in the article.
They have a hypothetical gay person whom would be hypothetically offended, or made to feel inferior.
We know that the possible offense of a gay person is much more important that the actual offense of a Christian.
A Christian, geez next thing you know they will want to impose their values on everyone and not leave us alone with our moral relativisim.
The Christian message is a message of hate and intolerance, we should ban their books – and burn them too!
Well researched
Librarians have told the students that the books they want to donate aren’t well-researched and some might make homosexual students “feel inferior.”
The students should start going through the library and pulling all books that they think are poorly researched.
Librarians are the worst censors. ALA code of ethics my foot.
Well Researched or well reviewed?
As a Christian and librarian with a MLIS degree I feel that these students have every right to add books to the library collection we have such a liberal viewpoint that there needs to be another viewpoint to the topic at hand. These Christian students are not imposing their ideas they simply want another viewpoint that state otherwise to the topic at hand. There should always be another side to every topic. I have Harry Potter books at my school library and books that are against it and for it…the same with the Dan Brown Da Vinci Code book giving my students the option to choose to read either or both…but I digress…
The librarian that cowardly stated that the books the students wanted to add might make some homosexual students feel inferior was a total copout and it is evident that he or she did not read the books that the students wanted to add to the collection to begin with but simply glanced at the covers and judge accordingly.
Whose Right? Who sets the standard?
On the other hand, is the library obligated to acquire self-published books, or catalog materials that are clearly “inspirational” or religious in nature with nonfiction materials addressing homosexuality from psychological or sociological perspectives? Is the library obligated to acquire books that do not meet the same quality standards required for all other books in the library (in other words, can the opinions of a group of students trump established collection development policy? Do Christian materials get a pass simply because they’re Christian?)
And when does a library user or student EVER have a RIGHT to add books to the library? Especially when the students haven’t read the books, as the Channel 4 news and Washington Post accounts reported?
If you read the less biased Washington Post account, the librarian made it clear that 1) she had offered to work with the students to find books that met standards that sympathized with or expressed their views on homosexuality; 2) books belittling minorities of all persuasions had been rejected when judged to be too polemical.
It’s one thing to say that the library should work with these students to identify works to add diversity to the collection – which the librarian has offered to do. It’s another thing altogether to say that Focus on the Family, a partisan Christian group, should be able to recruit a group of students as a means of forcing a tax-supported, public school library to acquire Focus on the Family’s hand-picked, religiously themed materials regardless of the standards set in the school board’s collection development policy, or the goals and the mission of the school’s curriculum.
Though the goal itself – increasing the diversity of the collection – may have merit, the means are nothing more than detestable (and cynical) political theater.
More objective and comprehensive account in Wash Post
Actually, the librarian told them that the books did not meet the standard required by the school board’s collection development policy, which requires two positive reviews in professional journals for nonfiction acquistions. The Washington Post has a (cough) more balanced story than CBN.com (the Christian Broadcast Network, evangelist Pat Robertson’s news feed.)
According to the Post reporter, the books were assembled by Focus on the Family (who had an adult representative at the protest) and the angry youth did not claim to have read the books they said were so important to them that they had to be on their school library shelves.
So query: When do we turn over our collection development decisions to Focus on the Family?
Read the story here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100203644.html?referrer=emailarticle
Whew! Thanks for the breath
Whew! Thanks for the breath of fresh logic!
And before you call the librarian a hypocritical censor
Consider this nugget of info from the Washington Post:
“Thornily (the library coodinator) said she has offered to help find books that meet the county standards and offer a religious view on homosexuality along with other views. She has asked librarians to consider adding such books to their collections. ”
So, it comes down to the fact that the Focus on the Family youth want it all on their terms, and dodge the need to meet the standards required by their school board.
Cute
Although the ” two positive reviews from professionally recognized journals” requirement is standard collection development policy boilerplate, it results in second-rate collections. Which books are going to have two “professional journal” reviews (2PJR)? –the ones published in large quantities by major publishers. And what kinds of things get published in large quantities by major publishers?– primarily titles they expect will bring them either money or prestige. Consequently, 2PJR books are going to miss most of the extremes of opinion. Do you really only want “the mainstream” in your library’s collection? –only the “prestigious?” –the “successful?” –no room for the “out there?” –the borderline and the marginalized?
Just curious– how many of you provide Internet access? Do you filter out anything not reviewed in two professional journals?
All I ask is this: drop the 2PJR logjam. I’d settle for any review and not necessarily in a “published journal.”
amazon review?
So you’d take a review from a customer on Amazon.com? I don’t think that would hold up to the scrutiny of the “taxpayers”. You know, the people footing the bill for purchasing those library books. Yeah, I get tired of people throwing the “you’re wasting my tax dollars” spiel, but we do answer to them and should have legitimate reasoning behind every purchase. Whether it be it was a bestseller, it has several good reviews in professional journals, it won several awards, it was requested by patrons, or what have you. If it is truly requested by the students and not a publicity stunt (hence the Focus on the Family rep. being at the protest), then the library should at least consider it.
The difference of the internet and books is the cost. It’s a flat rate (monthly or yearly) for the internet and every website. There is no extra expense to get everything, so there is no need to filter to save money or space. The reason a library sets collection development policies for materials truly comes down to money. It costs money for every single book that you try to put in the library. In a perfect world where money didn’t matter, I’d love to see these books on the shelf next to others of different perspectives. It doesn’t matter if I agree with them or not.
At my library, which is a public library, we rarely add donations to the collection because the donations are often old, out of date, in bad condition, or something we already have. If we accept any donations, it is made clear to the donater that we have the right to do whatever we want with it. There are no stipulations to adding it to the collection. We can add it, donate it somewhere else, or sell it through our Friends organization. If they don’t accept that, then we don’t accept the donation.
BTW, my library does have books funded by Focus on the Family and some of the James Dobson books. As well as other books that accept homosexuality. A library that has books that are reviewed can still have many viewpoints expressed, so “mainstream” can work.
Fair enough…
No, I don’t think a single positive customer review on Amazon constitutes sufficient evidence of “quality” for purchase. However, I do mean to include non-print resources–journals, magazines, and, yes, blogs. Judgement still works here–it’s not any magazine, or any blog. Why do we give the trade review publishers (Choice, PW, etc.) such undeserved influence over our collections?
To me it comes down to this– what’s more important: keeping the library safe and clean from infecting “underreviewed” materials, or casting the broadest net possible and in the act possibly even creating a truly diverse collection?
Of course good stewardship of the taxpayers’ dollars is important. I don’t deny that. I would just argue that stewardship includes the responsibility to build diverse collections, and relying only on books reviewed in two “professional journals” is not conducive to identifying the extremes of opinion. It’s been said that “a good library collection should have something to offend everyone.” That’s kind of a hard standard to live up to if you’re not collecting those extremes.