Anonymous Patron writes “Between 40 and 50 parents, students and other community residents crowded Arrowhead’s (Wisconsin) South Campus conference room to address the School Board about “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” and other books that are part of the high school’s modern-literature reading list.
Lake Country Reporter
Led by parents Karen and Kurt Krueger, during an hour-and-a-half public comment portion of the meeting, many spoke against and some in favor of the book by Stephen Chbosky.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel says Let School Board do its job in book dispute.”
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Parents as Partners
This battle has gotten out of hand because parents and the school board who should be partners in education have been thrust into the roles of combatants. Why does this happen? Perception is legitimate according to therapists. Parents perceive the inclusion of the book as a threat to their ability to transmit their family values. The school board perceives the exclusion of the book as a threat to legitimate educational concerns and freedom of speech issues. Whatever happened to negotiations? Isn’t it the liberal way to sit and talk when there is a dispute? Isn’t it the hallmark of a free society to arrive at a workable consensus? Parents give the school the right of serving in their place to educate their children. They indeed do have a say in their child’s education. The school conducts the education and they too have a right to create a curriculum they see as correct. It seems that what disturbs this partnership is that old demon agenda drive. Negotiations and a workable solution are the antidote to agenda driven poison. Instead of sideing with each side I believe that we should be encouraging discussion and resolution. We as librarians should be an impartial resource in this dispute, not fanning the flames in this dispute.
Re:Parents as Partners
Short answer: Due to the diametric opposition and mutual exclusion between intolerance and tolerance.
For the intolerant, it is not enough that they be allowed to have and express their opinions or to control their childrens’ access to materials; they also want power over the opinions and children of other people. Witness the paragraph in the Lake Country Reporter article about the guy who had already decided that his child would not participate in the course.
Which is patently ridiculous. Family values are taught in the home, not in school. As you intimate, however, the perception of the obstruction creates its own reality. The discomfort of a psychosomatic pain is not any less real just because the limb which hurts was amputated years and years ago. There is a fallacy behind this belief, though. Children learn the attitudes that they will have as adults by the they time they are ten years old, and basic attitudes are supposed to be irrevocably fixed
for life. The attitudes lie dormant until sometime between sixteen and twenty-two, inclusive; then some minor event triggers an emotional overreaction and the attitudes spring to the forefront in an instant. So even if a child is taught to be respectful of the opposite gender, he or she might still be contemptuous throughout high school and college. Those who seek to have books removed from curricula or school libraries, often talk about “impressionable youth”, as in this case, but young adults
are too old to develop the kinds of attitudes the parents fear they will. That’s not to say they won’t engage in that kind of behaviour during that latency period, mind you.
A second fallacy in this belief is that a child will learn “values” only at home and only from the primary caregiver. They also learn attitudes from brothers and sisters, peers, teachers other than at school, neighbours — and they do most of their learning by observation, not by what they are told so much. Which is probably why so many young adults think of their parents as hypocrites. (Oh, she tells me not to smoke {puff, puff}, and says she’s trying to quit, but I’ve seen her smoking out
behind the swing.)
It is if the book is excluded for the wrong reasons. And all the reasons given in this case are the wrong ones.
That is what’s happening. The book is undergoing a review process, people have been allowed to air their views in an open forum; the free marketplace of ideas is working. The thing is, not everyone is participating with a liberal viewpoint.
That’s not always feasible. With some people, once their minds are made up they will not change them no matter what the facts are. Compromise is not an option for them, all that matters is getting their own way. If concensus were possible in this case, I think the complainants would be satisfied to settle for exercising their right to restrict access for their children instead of attempting to restrict access for everybody else’s.
So is having a review process policy in place before you need it; which is the case in this incident.
You can encourage discussion and resolution to your heart’s content but it takes two to tango. If one participant flatly refuses to engage in mutual dialogue and the free exchange of ideas, you can’t force him to. It’s like telling an alcoholic that he needs help. You can talk yourself blue in the face but it won’t do a lick of good until he admits it to himself first.
Re:Parents as Partners
“For the intolerant, it is not enough that they be allowed to have and express their opinions or to control their childrens’ access to materials; they also want power over the opinions and children of other people.”
That statement could apply to either side.
“Those who seek to have books removed from curricula or school libraries, often talk about “impressionable youth”, as in this case, but young adults are too old to develop the kinds of attitudes the parents fear they will. That’s not to say they won’t engage in that kind of behaviour during that latency period, mind you.”
They won’t develop the attitudes though they will act them out?
“Family values are taught in the home, not in school”
vs.
“A second fallacy in this belief is that a child will learn “values” only at home and only from the primary caregiver. They also learn attitudes from brothers and sisters, peers, teachers other than at school, neighbours — and they do most of their learning by observation, not by what they are told so much”
“You can encourage discussion and resolution to your heart’s content but it takes two to tango. If one participant flatly refuses to engage in mutual dialogue and the free exchange of ideas, you can’t force him to. It’s like telling an alcoholic that he needs help. You can talk yourself blue in the face but it won’t do a lick of good until he admits it to himself first.”
Somebody who believes in something and makes a stand is like an alcholholic?
[from the article]”Topics in the novel include making friends, family tensions, a first relationship, a friend’s suicide, date rape, drug use, abuse, homosexuality, masturbation, oral sex and abortion.”
Based on this alone it sounds like there are very good reasons to exclude this book. It may be high school level, some of these may be very legitmate issues but how responsible can a book be
in talking about these issues when it throws in everything but the kitchen sink?
Re:Parents as Partners
Prove it. You have made a statement, but have not offered any supporting arguments. Just because you say it is so does not make it so. Liberals are, by and large, quite willing to allow you to be any kind of extremist it pleases you to be within the confines of your own life. Ultra-conservatives have demonstrated time and again by their actions and attitudes that they will not reciprocate. The only way you can support your contention is with double-think.
Re:Parents as Partners
“Liberals are, by and large, quite willing to allow you to be any kind of extremist it pleases you to be within the confines of your own life”
So do conservatives but by having no standards in public institutions Liberals allow any kind of extremist it pleases you to be outside the confines of your private life and affecting the lives of others.
Whether you have morals and beliefs or a complete lack thereof there is no getting around the fact that any policy based on those beliefs or lack of beliefs will negatively affect somebody.
Fang:”Family values are taught in the home, not in school”
vs.
Fang:”A second fallacy in this belief is that a child will learn “values” only at home and only from the primary caregiver. They also learn attitudes from brothers and sisters, peers, teachers other than at school, neighbours — and they do most of their learning by observation, not by what they are told so much”
And you accuse me of doublethink?
Re:Parents as Partners
I beg your pardon, I keep forgetting that conservatives/Republicans have no capacity for nuance. There is a difference between my teaching my child and my child learning something outside my sphere of influence. I can teach family values in the home that cannot be taught in school, but I have no control over factors that will influence my child, such as peer pressure, and from which she will learn attitudes that will shape her character.
Bullshit. Wholesale anti-intellectualism, sexual enslavement, picking and choosing what the public is allowed to read, or write, or say, or think. In effect: deciding how other people will be allowed to live their lives. These are the hallmarks of conservativism, and every one goes beyond the confines of your own life to interfere in the lives of others.
What makes any person free is that they have sole authority over and responsibility for their own selves. When any person or group attempts to abrogate or derogate from that principle for any reason whatsoever you necessarily reduce that other person to the status of chattel; property. A slave. The only exceptions are those people so severely disabled that they cannot be responsible for themselves. Conservatism, and ultra-conservatives in particular, seek authoritarian or totalitarian societies respectively. Study any religious regime throughout history. Start with the Taliban; they were the most recent to go that route.
Re:Parents as Partners
I’d love to see what’s in your medicine cabinet Fang.
Re:Parents as Partners
I take it by your statement, then, that you have no rebuttal to my arguments?