July 2006

In Miami a Clear Case of Political Censorship

kathleen de la pena mccook writes “CBS4/MIAMI HERALD) MIAMI No decision was made Friday following a court hearing on an effort by the Miami-Dade County school board to ban a controversial book on Cuba from school libraries. Evan Bacon reports with an excellent overview of the hearing on CBS. See the video.

The Miami Herald reports:

Judge hears case on banning Cuba book
The ACLU argued in a federal court that banning a controversial book on Cuba is a clear case of political censorship.

As attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union argued in federal court Friday [July 21,2006) that the banning of the controversial children’s book Vamos a Cuba was a classic case of political censorship, the ban’s defenders said it painted life in Cuba as if it were Coral Gables rather than a communist dictatorship.
”It was only when the politicians got involved that the books were removed,” said JoNel Newman, a University of Miami attorney leading the ACLU’s case, before U.S. District Judge Alan S. Gold.
During an evidentiary hearing, her side tried to establish that two review committees and the superintendent had carefully weighed the issues of age appropriateness and accuracy before deciding to keep the books on the shelves of Miami-Dade public school libraries, but the School Board overrode its own procedural rules to ban them….

During Friday’s hearing, a small group of librarians sometimes scoffed at the board’s lawyers, at one point provoking a shushing from a security officer. In library science circles, they said, the solution to omitted information is to add more books to a collection, not to remove them.

”Not every book can be everything to everyone,” said Pat Scales, a library science expert and member of the American Library Association, which entered the case in favor of the ACLU. Her testimony: “Adults are trying to bring their own political views to the minds of children.”

More here

kathleen de la pena mccook writes “CBS4/MIAMI HERALD) MIAMI No decision was made Friday following a court hearing on an effort by the Miami-Dade County school board to ban a controversial book on Cuba from school libraries. Evan Bacon reports with an excellent overview of the hearing on CBS. See the video.

The Miami Herald reports:

Judge hears case on banning Cuba book
The ACLU argued in a federal court that banning a controversial book on Cuba is a clear case of political censorship.

As attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union argued in federal court Friday [July 21,2006) that the banning of the controversial children’s book Vamos a Cuba was a classic case of political censorship, the ban’s defenders said it painted life in Cuba as if it were Coral Gables rather than a communist dictatorship.
”It was only when the politicians got involved that the books were removed,” said JoNel Newman, a University of Miami attorney leading the ACLU’s case, before U.S. District Judge Alan S. Gold.
During an evidentiary hearing, her side tried to establish that two review committees and the superintendent had carefully weighed the issues of age appropriateness and accuracy before deciding to keep the books on the shelves of Miami-Dade public school libraries, but the School Board overrode its own procedural rules to ban them….

During Friday’s hearing, a small group of librarians sometimes scoffed at the board’s lawyers, at one point provoking a shushing from a security officer. In library science circles, they said, the solution to omitted information is to add more books to a collection, not to remove them.

”Not every book can be everything to everyone,” said Pat Scales, a library science expert and member of the American Library Association, which entered the case in favor of the ACLU. Her testimony: “Adults are trying to bring their own political views to the minds of children.”

More here

New Building of Peter Chase, Patriot Act Dissident, Flooded

Anonymous Patron writes “One of the four Connecticut Library Connection consortium members involved with the Civil Liberties Union in the recent well publiciized USA Patriot Act Records Case has not been able to obtain a permanent occupancy permit for the new Plainville CT library building under his directorship since its completion in December 2003. Peter Chase, now president of Library Connection and director of the Plainville Library saw flooding again inundate portions of the newly constructed building. Here is the New Britain Herald story.”

Librarian Knows how to Jump and Jive

Anonymous Patron writes The Reno Gazette Journal has a report on Julie Machado. With a bubbly, extroverted personality, Machado has been program manager for the Northwest Reno Library since it opened seven years ago on Robb Drive.

But like many a character in the mystery novels she loves to read, this librarian by day leads a double life.

That double life was in full swing — and jive — on a warm, late afternoon as the petite Machado deftly handled a large, honking bass violin in front of an appreciative crowd at the 2006 Great Basin Chautauqua celebration at Rancho San Rafael Regional Park.”

Can Wikipedia conquer expertise?

Anonymous Patron writes The New Yorker Asks Can Wikipedia conquer expertise? The site has achieved prominence largely without paid staff or revenue. It has five employees in addition to Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia’s thirty-nine-year-old founder, and it carries no advertising. In 2003, Wikipedia became a nonprofit organization; it meets most of its budget, of seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars, with donations, the bulk of them contributions of twenty dollars or less.”

Cites & Insights 6:10 postponed

The special “design and typography” issue of Cites & Insights for August 2006 has been cancelled on account of heat (and other reasons). (If you want more details, check Walt at Random after 5:30 p.m. PST today.)

My expectation had been that most people could and would skip this mini-issue. Now you (we!) all will.

C&I 6:10, August/September 2006, will appear in August, probably late August. It will be a more substantial issue, almost certainly featuring “Looking at Liblogs: A Chunk of the Great Middle” (title not final).

Possibly the last word on Vote Smart

The Missoula Independent has an article in their latest issue about Project Vote Smart’s malfunctions in communication with organizations big and small, and how they may leave Montana. In the article is a brief interview with Michael Gorman about the ALA debacle, where Project Vote Smart refused to continute providing free materials to libraries without an endorsement. Turns out that ALA was not the first nor the last organization yanked around by Project Vote Smart, as I could tell you based on my experiences there. Not that I’m bitter, no…

From Planning to Warfare to Occupation, How Iraq Went Wrong

From the NYT Books Section:
The title of this devastating new book about the American war in Iraq says it all: “Fiasco.” That is the judgment that Thomas E. Ricks, senior Pentagon correspondent for The Washington Post, passes on the Bush administration’s decision to invade Iraq and its management of the war and the occupation. And he serves up his portrait of that war as a misguided exercise in hubris, incompetence and folly with a wealth of detail and evidence that is both staggeringly vivid and persuasive. Article continued here.

Banned books ordered back on shelves

Anonymous Patron writes “A series of children’s books banned last month by the Dade School Board must remain in libraries while the district fights a lawsuit filed by the ACLU. In a sometimes scathing 89-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Alan Gold said the School Board “abused its discretion in a manner that violated the transcendent imperatives of the First Amendment.””