January 2002

Hong Kong’s Paddyfield.com and libraries

Lee Hadden writes: \”The Wall Street Journal has an article today (January 30, 2002), on
page B5D by Bruce Knecht, \”Hong Kong Bookseller Paddyfield.com Breaks Even
by Cutting Costs, Reaching Out.\”

\”In the US, library supply companies provide schools with information
about the best new titles, but schools in Hong Kong generally have had to
rely on long-distance relationships with individual publishers. Filling the
void, Mrs. Leung, a 40 year old mother of two young children, meets with
librarians as well as teachers and other parents to tell them about the
latest books.\”

The on-line bookstore competitor to Amazon.com now has over 700,000
titles available for their customers, and has been profitable for some
time.
See: paddyfield.com.\”

Stephen King ready to close book as writer?

CNN Says Stephen King will only publish five more books, and a limited series for ABC, and then, he\’s ending his career in publishing.


Most people could hope to do that much in a life time.

\”You get to a point where you get to the edges of a room, and you can go back and go where you\’ve been and basically recycle stuff,\”

ThisIsPush

PUSH is dedicated to new authors and new voices.

They say… \”These writers tell it like it really is. No preaching. No false endings. No stereotypes or contrivance. Just an honest dose of reality. These books are funny, observant, heartbreaking, and heartstopping.\”


The Tm & © says Scholastic Inc, but there is little in the way of any more info.

Time to rewrite the DMCA

News.com has a Great Editorial by Rick Boucher who says traditional \”fair use\” rights are at the foundation of the receipt and use of information by the American people, and those rights are now under attack.


He goes on to say Congress agreed to a fundamentally flawed bill, which created the new crime of circumvention–a crime divorced from over a century and a half of respect for the fair-use rights of consumers. The DMCA, as enacted, quite clearly tilted the balance in the Copyright Act toward complete protection and away from information availability.

\”Consider the implications. A time may soon come when what is available for free on library shelves will only be available on a pay-per-use basis. It would be a simple matter for a copyright owner to impose a requirement that a small fee be paid each time a digital book or video documentary is accessed by a library patron. Even the student who wants even the most basic access to only a portion of the book to write a term paper would have to pay to avoid committing a crime.\”