Journals & Magazines

New Electronic Journal: The Journal of Library Innovation

The Western New York Library Resources Council is pleased to announce plans to publish The Journal of Library Innovation, one of the first journals devoted explicitly to innovation and creativity in libraries. This peer reviewed, electronic journal will publish original research, literature reviews, commentaries, case studies, reports on innovative practices, letters, as well as book and product reviews. The journal will also welcome provocative essays that will stimulate thought on the current and future role of libraries in an Internet Age.

The inaugural issue will be published in January 2010. Please watch for a call for papers in the near future. For more information, please contact Editor-in-Chief Sheryl Knab (sknab@wnylrc.org) or Managing Editor Pamela Jones (pjones@medaille.edu).

Kenney: It's time for ALA to set its journals free

Brian Kenney: "librarians are the most vocal advocates for open access to journal content—except, apparently, when it’s their own publications. I suspect this is because of ALA’s outdated, carrot-on-the-end-of-the-stick, publishing model: keep the publications locked away as the supreme benefit of membership. "

Finally, there is common sense. If you want your content to be used, then readers need to be able to discover it through a search engine and read it in a click. Or find it in their feed aggregator. We need to be able to forward it, post our disagreements with it, blog about it, and have it pushed to us on Facebook. It must, in short, be integrated into our professional lives. Or else it becomes irrelevant, no matter how good it might be.

A league table of journals

A league table of journals: The Australian government is revising its research assessment system, and is in the process of setting up ERA, Excellence in Research for Australia. This new system was an early commitment of the Labor Government elected in November of last year, and is replacing the Research Quality Framework (RQF) which the previous Government had started to develop in 2006, and which was intended to carve up AU$600 million in block grant research funding. That system did not reach fruition, despite (and partly because of) being very costly. The new system is designed to benchmark Australian research better within an international context, and is - for the moment - not intended to lead to a ranking-based carve-up of the research funding pot, though that option has been left in for the future.

Cites & Insights 8:9 (September 2008) available

Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 8:9 (September 2008) is now available.

The 26-page issue (PDF as usual, but HTML versions of the individual essays are available using the links below or at the C&I home page) includes the following five essays:
Bibs & Blather: Projects and Rejects

40% less self-indulgent than the five-part post! Some new information! Otherwise, it's largely the same material. If you feel you already know all this, skip right on over to:

Perspective: Updating the Book Discovery Projects

Microsoft dropped its project--and in the process released all limits on 300,000 scanned books and gave the scanners to its partners. That and lots more in this multipart roundup.

Perspective: On Conferences in a Time of Limits

Why do we go to conferences--and will conferences change significantly thanks to high travel costs? Some semi-informed musings and non-predictions.

Old Media/New Media -- Read More

Phone Research Articles

Ok - I know this reply is several years late. In doing a Cuil search, I came across the very kind review by Daniel of a Searcher article I wrote on phone research (I've included that post below). Even years late, his review totally made my day - so many thanks, Daniel.

I just wanted to let anyone interested know that a copy of the article is available for free on my website www.risasacks.com. If it's useful to you - help yourself. There is also a copy of the follow-up, sequel article, "The Search Goes On." Finally, having had an article and a sequel, we had, of course, to write the 'prequel' - 'Before You Pick up the Phone" will be in the September issue of Searcher, and will be available on my website in about three months. If any of these are useful to you, please feel free to download them and pass them on. (and Daniel, I'd love to hear how you found the unlisted number of the Canadian MP).

Excellent article in Searcher about using the phone
Sat, 03/26/2005 - 01:08 — Daniel

The March 2005 (v.13, no.3) print issue of Searcher Magazine has this good article:

Anatomy of a Phone Search: Primary Research Using the Original "Online"
By Risa Sacks, p. 42.

The article is a great primer on picking up the phone to do primary research. Ms. Sacks discusses how much personal information to disclose to people you are interviewing, and how to use referrals from one person to gain entree with another potential source of information. -- Read More

News Flash From the Cover of Esquire: Paper Magazines Can Be High Tech, Too

On the third floor of the Museum of Modern Art in Midtown Manhattan rests a tribute to Esquire’s glory years — a collection of 92 covers from the 1960s and early 1970s that have become, in the museum’s words, “essential to the iconography of American culture.”

That illustrious history hangs over the magazine’s effort to celebrate its 75th year. Its attempt to add to the annals of museum-worthy covers includes a nod to the digital age: an electronic cover, using admittedly rudimentary technology, that will flash “the 21st Century Begins Now,” when it appears on newsstands in September.

Read full story of how e-ink will be used on the cover of Esquire at the New York Times.

New Yorker Cover...Does It Cross the Line of Satire?

It's Monday, there's a new New Yorker out, and on the cover, a caricature of Barack Obama and wife Michelle portrayed as Islamic terrorists.

Tongues are wagging and words are flying from the Huffington Post, Politico, Editor and Publisher, Washington Monthly, etc.

Obama...and McCain agree--"it’s tasteless and offensive.”

Librarian Interviews Amazingly Cool Open Source Guy, Now Online

I wasn't sure if this was going to come to pass, but it does appear that my interview with Mark Shuttleworth is now available online. I knew they put some content up, but had no idea how exactly they determined what content went where.

So why do I keep belaboring that interview here? Because Mark Shuttleworth is cool, and I think that there are a few things in the interview that librarians (and educators) might find interesting. Hold on to your hats, non-techie types... Not only do we never talk directly about Ubuntu, but we don't talk a whole lot about really overtly horribly bloody tech stuff in general.

For those who do love the tech stuff (there have to be a few of you, still, right?), I've launched into a podcast adventure with Lisa Hoover (of various tech media outlets) that can be found here if you're interested. Please note that we're librarians and writers, we're located at different ends of the eastern seaboard, and between Skype, my way too sensitive mic, and our inexperience with manhandling audio (this being our first podcast), it's a little rougher sounding this week than it will be next. We hope.

Cites & Insights 8:7 available

Cites & Insights 8:7, July 2008, is now available.

The 26-page issue is PDF as always, but most essays can also be downloaded at the Cites & Insights home page or from the links below.

This issue includes:

Peer Review, Journal Articles, and Blogs - an Example

In Peer Review, Journal Articles, and Blogs - an Example David Lee King takes a look at the slow pace of print, "My article is being published more than two years AFTER the original conversation took place", and his blog as a peer review tool, "To me, that’s true, useful peer review - instant feedback, criticism, and suggestions from my peers."

Now compare that with the traditional model of peer review - 2-4 anonymous reviewers who grant the right for an article to be published or not. No discussion, no conversation, no interaction. To respond, one has to either write a letter to the editor or write another article - in which case any true discussion is killed. Which is better peer review?

Syndicate content