Books vs. Kindle by way of High Fidelity: How will people know what you like?

After reading that <a href="">Kindle made books worthless</a>, one librarian wonders how the Kindle may affect social interactions and what to do with that extra space in your house. <a href="">Full pontification here</a>

Scholarly E-Mail Lists, Once Vibrant, Fight for Relevance

Once they were hosts to lively discussions about academic style and substance, but the time of scholarly e-mail lists has passed, meaningful posts slowing to a trickle as professors migrate to blogs, wikis, Twitter, and social networks like Facebook.

"While I am still on a few listservs, it is mainly because they give me no other option for receiving information," wrote Kay Cunningham, an electronic-resources librarian at the University of Memphis. "I find them increasingly annoying —even those with digest options, and for the most part I delete them unread."

Salinger sues over Rye 'sequel'

Author JD Salinger is taking legal action to block the publication of a book billed as a follow-up to his classic novel The Catcher in the Rye.

According to legal papers filed in New York, the 90-year-old's lawyers called the book a "rip-off pure and simple".

60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye features someone similar to Holden Caulfield from Salinger's work, which he says only he is able to use.

"Look Inside" the effing librarian.

I probably haven't said it enough to bother me hearing it (although most other people would disagree), but the.effing.librarian has books.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

On The Twitter Brouhaha

Tuesday was a unique day. As the 12th day of May and its second Tuesday, I had appointments to keep within civil society. While I was out and about interacting with other human beings in-person, Twitter launched a change. Download Squad reported that Twitter changed part of their core functioning. UX specialist Whitney Hess railed against the change. Gregory Pittman linked on Twitter to a blog post where Twitter explained that the change was due to engineering limitations related to system stability.

This presents a core problem in the Twitter debates. Twitter may be where people hang out. Is it structurally capable of handling the load, though? Are there reasonable assurances of consistent system behavior? Today's blog post dances around the problem of scalability somewhat by relegating it to being the 800 pound elephant in the room.

Twitter, at its core, is a fairly limited service. External bolt-ons like TwitPic, Twibes, and more were created to make the service do more than was ever intended originally. Re-tweets, "Follow Friday", and other such things are more limited now which practically prevents serendipitous discovery. Unless service was contracted by a library with Twitter, there could be no guaranteed service level which could potentially annoy patrons that might seek help via Twitter.

Twitter is not the only game in town for microblogging, though. In December 2008, LISTen talked to Evan Prodomou who is a principal designer of the Laconica software platform. is the flagship site for the Laconica service while others like TWiT Army and Dungeon Twitter also exist. Group functionality that Twibes provides Twitter is also integrated into Laconica itself. Twitpic, Twitterfeed, and more can now interact with Laconica-based sites just as easily as they can interact with Twitter.

It seems a technically superior choice to Twitter exists. With the weeping and gnashing of teeth observed Tuesday over changes in functionality, the question is raised as to what constitutes the bright line that has to be crossed before someone will switch services. At the least, you can control your own local Laconica installation far more readily than you can impact engineering decision-making at Twitter. With federation possible through the OpenMicroBlogging protocol, there is less of a need for the monolithic microblogging platform than before.

The biggest question seems to be, though, what the next move is for Twitter users.

Creative Commons License
On The Twitter Brouhaha by Stephen Michael Kellat is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

Land Lines vs. Cell Phones

I was at my favorite home-away-from-home study center. Actually it is not the library, but a nice hangout for Wi-Fi'ing, eating, drinking (coffee mind you :-) and other miscellaneous activities.

Anyway, I have found new ways to use my time and that includes actually conducting business, both personal and official, via my cell phone. I feel I have a good phone, an excellent carrier and a good connection. The idea, and this applies to both librarian and layman, is that there is absolutely NOTHING that can compete with a land-line connection.

It has been determined that nearly 20% of telephony users in the U.S. are now utilizing cell phones as their primary number. Isn't this blasphemy? Am I turning into a Luddite? Although I cannot speak for my collective generation (Boomer's), I can say that most of us still prefer that nice little device called the home telephone, wall phone, desk phone, cordless phone - by any other name it would SOUND as sweet!

Maybe our hearing has never adapted to the sound of cell phones, but I struggled today with insuring that I was being heard by the distant party. That is downright disturbing - I shouldn't be worrying about something like that. There are trade-offs though, and I cannot be tethered or home bound. Thus is the magic of the cell phone, but the true magic is that nice instrument at home - or whatever you want to call it - is as clear as a Bell, er bell....not to be confused with Ma Bell.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Judging That Book...

Blogger Pete writes: "there are more great book covers published each year than there are great books published each year."

This, and some other interesting observations about BAD COVERS, GREAT BOOKS at San Francisco's Green Apple Books blog, the Green Apple Core. Chime in with your observations...

Saga of the.EX.effing.librarian.

I don't know if you noticed, but there's a lot of stuff I need to do. And that's it. If there's an answer for why someone quits a blog, then, "I got other shit to do," is it.

People talk about "tipping points," and I hit mine when there was something I missed because I was being the.effing.librarian. I was blogging or tweeting or commenting and I missed something that my real life should be doing.

And that's when I realized that I had to stop.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 

Effing Free Effing Book


The Effing Librarian blog is finished. What? You never read it? Go back to your Dostoyevsky, egghead.

Bookstore Display: Books Amazon Doesn't Want You to Read

"We have put up our display of 'Books Amazon Doesn't Want You to Read.'"--@Vromans tweet in reaction to Amazon's de-ranking of LGBTQ books (Shelf Awareness, April 13, 2009).

In a subsequent bookstore blog post titled, "Amazonfail & The Cost of Freedom" Vroman's observed that "independent publisher sales rep John Mesjak put it best when he tweeted this statement: 'I haven't read all of #amazonfail, so I am likely repeating, but my takeaway: this S#!T happens with monoculture gatekeepers. "


Subscribe to Blogging