Submitted by Blake on September 17, 2007 - 11:21am
Karen Says: meeting your users where they are isn't about making them come to the library website. In considering our long term virtual presence plans, the library website is a given. People who come to the site know we exist and want to use our services. To truly be successful we have to get our content into the path of the people who wouldn't walk through our door (physical or virtual).
Submitted by birdie on September 4, 2007 - 1:45pm
shambolic57 writes "As a keen economic rationalist, albeit perhaps crucially for my credibility, one who works in a public library, I do take note of the musings regarding the dismal science and society at large over at Marginal Revolution.
Here is an interesting take on public library usage and the factors that one might employ in selecting books to read.
Hey LISNewsers- why not head over and leave a comment."
Submitted by Blake on August 9, 2007 - 12:44pm
21 Tips to Deal with Info Overload What follows are a number of tips, to be used together or separately, depending on your needs, that will help you become the Master of your information, and stop the onslaught of information overload, so that you can reconnect with what's truly important in your life.
Submitted by Blake on August 8, 2007 - 9:20am
Submitted by Blake on July 18, 2007 - 2:51pm
Over on The O'Reilly Radar Peter Brantley takes a look at some stats. Though, he says, they do not reflect on the total value of libraries, and they surely do not pass judgment on the highly skilled information specialists that staff them. They do suggest that something momentous has changed in the fundamental environment that libraries operate within. And one has to think: if libraries had shareholders, would they, like newspapers, be in the midst of a gut-wrenching, brake-screeching exercise in redefinition?
Submitted by Blake on April 23, 2007 - 11:22pm
Digital Reference: Will there still be a desk?: A good collection of links from Stephen Francoeur on the future of "the desk." Librarians have been busy this year debating the future of reference. The blog posts all offer a rich set of comments that gave him quite a few ideas, not so much prognostications about the future but instead a vision of how he would like to see our college library's reference desk changed. In his next post, he'll tackle that.
Submitted by Blake on February 2, 2007 - 6:50pm
"When I loose productive time at work it is usually because of a problem I have encountered with my computer. And any time I have a computer problem it is usually related to one of the following items. In order to be a little proactive I have build this little checklist. I have automated as many of them as I can and if much of your livelihood depends on your technology functioning smoothly I suggest you consider doing the same."
26 Tips to Keep Your Computer Up and Functioning
Submitted by Blake on February 1, 2007 - 1:38pm
zanne writes "Are libraries and librarians obsolete? No way, man! Courtesy of degreetutor.com,
here are 33 reasons why we still kick tush!"
Will Sherman says I Was Wrong, As libraries' relevance comes into question, they face an existential crisis at a time they are perhaps needed the most. Despite their perceived obsoleteness in the digital age both libraries and librarians are irreplaceable for many reasons. 33, in fact.
Society is not ready to abandon the library, and it probably won't ever be. Libraries can adapt to social and technological changes, but they can't be replaced.
Submitted by birdie on September 22, 2006 - 4:13pm
Anonymous Patron writes "This post is the second in a series about the application of the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) system design pattern to library services. The first post in this series focused on defining "Service Oriented Architecture" using the analogy of a transportation network. This post goes into some detail about what makes a "service" in this architecture and offers an example using a hypothetical use case: a union library catalog (Open WorldCat) making a statement about the availability of a book."
Submitted by Blake on June 11, 2006 - 1:26pm
Jill Stover revisits the idea of co-creation in libraries and how best to make it work for us and for patrons. "I've been thinking about it quite often, but so far have generated a collection of ideas, rather than a coherent philosophy, but at least it's a start. I would agree with one marketer's statement that services make tricky candidates for co-creation because many services exist because customers don't want to take on the task of performing those services themselves."
Submitted by Blake on June 11, 2006 - 9:22am
Steve Lawson has been doing some great writing lately, Library lessons from unlikely places is no exception.
This one is two little observations of library lessons learned in non-library places that have been kicking around in his head for the past few years (really!). "Usability and the drive-thru window" and "How not to give a reference interview at the DMV">
Submitted by Blake on May 21, 2006 - 12:53am
Remember Department Stores? Stephen Abrams Asks Remember department stores? They tried to be everything to everyone. He also asks: "Do libraries try to be everything for everyone? Are we too diverse and unspecialized? Can we build a community presence that engages people in a positioning of libraries that isn't overly homogenized? What positioning do you want for your library brand? Who do we want to excite?"
Submitted by Blake on May 20, 2006 - 7:50am
Eric Schnell asks Are Libraries Placing Value on Technology Innovation?. He says Job postings alone are not evidence that libraries are not placing a high enough value on innovation. If position recruitment can be an indicator of the the value libraries are placing on services, it appears we are continuing to grow our sustaining services (ah, the Librarian's Dilemma yet again) such as reference, technical services, and instruction. The administrative percentage may indicate the retirement bubble.
In the end, library organizations that do not place a value on disruptive technologies, and do not allocate resources and processes to deal with them, may find themselves faced with serious challenges in the coming years.
Submitted by Blake on May 18, 2006 - 5:35pm
Mark Y. Herring said the Internet is no substitute for a library in 2001. Now, in 2006, in an effort to save our profession, strike a blow for librarians, and, above all, correct the well-intentioned but misguided notions about what the future holds, here are 10 reasons why the Internet will soon be a substitute for the library for many people.
1. Everything I Need IS On The Internet.
2. Catalog This!
3. Quality Control Does Exist
4. Nothing Is Perfect
5. Check Out Dan Brown's Bytes @Your Library
6. The Ebook Is Coming
7. Look Ma, No Books!
8. Everything Is Born Digital
9. We No Longer Care What Was Written In 1970
10. The Internet Is Already Ubiquitous And Portable.
Submitted by rochelle on April 1, 2006 - 2:43pm
Zenmaster Librarian points to this mindblowing essay on information overload and how to cope. Why didn't someone think of this before?
Submitted by Blake on March 31, 2006 - 12:57am
An interesting post from over at Christina's LIS Rant raises an interesting point. She's taking a look at the seminal work in the communication literature from Clark and Brennan (1993) on common ground. It discusses how common ground is established in conversation and also reviews how features of different communications channels help/constrain grounding and how common ground can be different when communicating over different channels. For example, e-mail is reviewable and revisable, but not cotemporal or audible (in the traditional view). Common ground is established via the least collaborative effort required for the channel.
"I think the blogosphere has talked more about links establishing common ground in that they establish a common history and context. I link to librarians therefore I have an affinity towards librarians and/or I am one. More of placeing a person in their discipline via their blogroll and linking... but blogs are conversation..."
Submitted by Blake on March 30, 2006 - 4:42am
Brian E. Surratt posted this New Collections and Services (The 5th and last part of his whitepaper) on the Future of Academic Libraries. The Entire Paper is a great read that is a must read for all those interested in Academia.
"To adapt to the information age, the library must expand its functions to encompass the entire life cycle of information. The library must go beyond acquiring information from our traditional sources, such as publishers, vendors, and the government. Our imperative is to develop and cultivate digital collections owned and hosted by the library, tailored to the information age."
Submitted by Blake on March 14, 2006 - 12:59pm
Anonymous Patron writes "Medialoper You want a hot discussion? Put librarians, Microsoft, Google, and Bob Stein from the Institute for the Future of the Book on a SXSW panel to talk about issues surrounding book digitization (and call the panel "Revenge of the Librarians"An hour wasn't nearly long enough for the conversation - and the diverse audience proved that the issues surrounding digitization aren't limited to a small segment of the population."
Submitted by Blake on March 4, 2006 - 7:21pm
Lorcan Dempsey Takes A Look at the many "long tail" discussions and says the real issue is how well supply and demand are articulated in a network environment. And when we think about it in this systemwide way the picture is less reassuring. Think of two figures. The first is that ILLs account for 1.7% of overall circulations.
The second is about circulation.
He says Libraries do indeed collectively manage a long tail of research, learning and cultural materials. However, we need to do more work to make sure that that long tail is directly available to improve the work and lives of our users.
Submitted by Karl on March 2, 2006 - 11:11pm
Blogger Dan Chudnov has posted a very thoughtful answer to this question, based on the framework of the business book Good to Great by Jim Collins.
In brief, his answer is: "Help people build their own libraries."