Submitted by AndyW on September 8, 2010 - 1:14am
In my own experience (and somewhat amplified by the Master’s Degree posts (first
), there is a mystique that is lent to the reference desk like no other place in the library (save for closed stacks, the final mystery of the library world). It is the sacred space for the librarian immortals and perhaps the paraprofessional demigods who prove themselves worthy of its station. From behind this lauded furniture, answers are dispensed to all who seek wisdom within the walls of the library. It is the desk of last resort for those who continue to question, the deliverer of information redemption, and start of many journeys into discovery. To hear some of my peers talk about the reference desk, you would think that the desk was made of wood cut down by God, carved by Jesus, and blessed by his library apostles, Dewey and Ranganathan.
Submitted by AndyW on April 12, 2010 - 1:41am
Last week, I was at my favorite watering hole
with a group of my fellow librarians enjoying an evening of beer and socializing. During this gathering, Pete Bromberg
was telling me about his upcoming presentation at ALA Annual
, the RUSA President’s program “For the Love of Reference”.
When I got home, I looked up the write-up in the online preliminary program. This passage caught my eye:
We want to explore the twin appeals of information discovery and serving users that drive the devotion to reference and readers' advisory work.
I have written about reference before in terms out how the interviews could possibly be measured
(and maybe re-labeling reference service as an “information concierge
”), but I had not really considered examining the interaction itself and the implications of all of the possible outcomes. When I start to turn this idea over in my head, something really caught me. Imagine the reference interaction as this: an intersection of time and space in which you (as the librarian) have the ability to influence the resulting experience.