the chickenhawk arguement

Rich Lowry at NRO breaks it down here.


I'd like to add the vociferous Castro clique with public library cards and driving cars without tail fins.

Naturally, that chickenhawk is examining only one side of the equation. What Lowry failed to mention was that Hussein was an American puppet and supported by the U.S. for many years. Including being sold the chemical weapons he used in the mass murder of the Kurds. Hussein might have been a bad boy, but he was your bad boy until he went freelance, and therein lies the real sin he committed.

Same thing goes for Osama.

So, which bloody-handed and oppressive lunatic do you chickenhawks support to replace Hugo Chavez when Robertson gets him taken out?