Headlines By Email
Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
Navigation
User login
Recent comments
- Nice analysis 1 month 2 weeks ago
- Justifying the practice... 2 months 1 day ago
- Details 2 months 3 weeks ago
- Congrats on 20 years. 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy Brithday 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy birthday, LISNews! 3 months 2 weeks ago
- chapter 1-8 claims 10 months 1 week ago
- Not a novella? 1 year 1 week ago
- women of a certain age (sounds like a criticism right there...) 1 year 8 months ago
- Reading as a punishment 1 year 10 months ago
Recent blog posts
- Appreciating the ‘powerful good’ of the public library
- New Domain, New Blog
- A.I. as virtual research mediators
- Fed Life Working Without Pay
- Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union
- Cites & Insights December 2018 (18:9) available
- Cites & Insights 18:7 (October 2018) available
- Cites & Insights 18:6 (September 2018) available
- Apparently Alex Jones isn't totally silenced
- Cites & Insights 18.5 (August 2018) available
Internet Searching
This highlights the problems of Internet searching in the sicences, rather than depending upon abstracting services such as Chem Abstracts or GeoRef or Mathematical Reviews. On the Internet, all publications are equal, even crazy ones from problematic journals.
Controlled indexing and abstracting fee-services in the sciences are confined to a number of peer reviewed journals. Although even this is not 100% effective, it is a good way to determine which articles are published in respected journals.
But patron generated searches are cheaper, and by-passing the respected and often society-produced indexing and abstracting services mean that the silly are mixed up with the good. Thus another problem in searching for keywords on the Internet, and doing away with the subject specialist reference librarians.