Headlines By Email
Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
Navigation
User login
Recent comments
- Nice analysis 1 month 2 weeks ago
- Justifying the practice... 2 months 1 day ago
- Details 2 months 3 weeks ago
- Congrats on 20 years. 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy Brithday 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy birthday, LISNews! 3 months 2 weeks ago
- chapter 1-8 claims 10 months 1 week ago
- Not a novella? 1 year 1 week ago
- women of a certain age (sounds like a criticism right there...) 1 year 8 months ago
- Reading as a punishment 1 year 10 months ago
Recent blog posts
- Appreciating the ‘powerful good’ of the public library
- New Domain, New Blog
- A.I. as virtual research mediators
- Fed Life Working Without Pay
- Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union
- Cites & Insights December 2018 (18:9) available
- Cites & Insights 18:7 (October 2018) available
- Cites & Insights 18:6 (September 2018) available
- Apparently Alex Jones isn't totally silenced
- Cites & Insights 18.5 (August 2018) available
So what you are saying
So if we take what you said your point was and replace that with what you first said we get this statement --
Second, while I'm certain that it's true that most self-published books sell fewer than 150 copies, from an author's perspective, most mainstream books are "failures" in that they never return any additional income.
------------
Well for this to be true it depends on how much the advance is. Also why is getting an advance not counted as a success? Why is getting an advance a failure? Median advance for fiction was $5000 a couple years ago. If I sell 150 books on Lulu I might make $10 per copy. Why is making $5000 over $1500 not a success?