Add new comment

In answer to your question anonymous I guess the companies (especially non-US ones) would wonder why they should pay and would just take the work from the Far East and China instead and not bother with those that demanded recompense ;)
I agree though, there should not be work done for companies working on a for-profit basis being done for free. So that is peer review and editorial work that should get some compensation (whether that is money, discounted books or something else) for every author that does work for them.

What is always missed is the actual cost of Open Access publishing. Unless you are lucky enough to have a NIH funded 12 month mandated OA deposit criteria (or rather publish only in journals that only offer that and don't charge a flat rate whoever you are) it's not cheap. It is in fact yet another level of money that the tax payers of any nation are having to fork out to get published over the print, online, peer review etc etc. If you publish with Elsevier it's $3000 to make it open access within 6 months (as is the mandate in the UK's research councils and Wellcome Foundation) that's a for-profit company. But even the pure OA titles, such as Frontiers will charge you 2000 euro's to be published (albeit a lot faster). Now this is much fairer but it's still an additional 2000 euros you are spending that you didn't have to spend before.
And who pays for that? The tax payer.