Headlines By Email
Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
Navigation
User login
Recent comments
- Nice analysis 1 month 2 weeks ago
- Justifying the practice... 2 months 1 day ago
- Details 2 months 3 weeks ago
- Congrats on 20 years. 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy Brithday 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy birthday, LISNews! 3 months 2 weeks ago
- chapter 1-8 claims 10 months 1 week ago
- Not a novella? 1 year 1 week ago
- women of a certain age (sounds like a criticism right there...) 1 year 8 months ago
- Reading as a punishment 1 year 10 months ago
Recent blog posts
- Appreciating the ‘powerful good’ of the public library
- New Domain, New Blog
- A.I. as virtual research mediators
- Fed Life Working Without Pay
- Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union
- Cites & Insights December 2018 (18:9) available
- Cites & Insights 18:7 (October 2018) available
- Cites & Insights 18:6 (September 2018) available
- Apparently Alex Jones isn't totally silenced
- Cites & Insights 18.5 (August 2018) available
I read a post on simple
I read a post on simple strong passwords awhile ago and I got the impression that a phrase is good, period. Unless the Bad Guys are out there using a 'common phrase dictionary' attack (still defeated, one would imagine, but the inclusion of a single proper noun), EVERY word is unrelated to a computer.
I had a moment a year or so ago where some spam was sent FROM my Gmail (not masquerading), but it was resolved in less than 36 hours, and that's the only time so far (knock knock) that I've had a problem - using the same or extremely simple variations of the same three passwords and two PIN numbers for the past... at least 15 years. Are we too worried about password security?
Or was this post directed to our avid CIA and missile silo technician audience? ;)