Headlines By Email
Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
Navigation
User login
Recent comments
- Nice analysis 1 month 2 weeks ago
- Justifying the practice... 2 months 1 day ago
- Details 2 months 3 weeks ago
- Congrats on 20 years. 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy Brithday 3 months 1 week ago
- Happy birthday, LISNews! 3 months 2 weeks ago
- chapter 1-8 claims 10 months 1 week ago
- Not a novella? 1 year 1 week ago
- women of a certain age (sounds like a criticism right there...) 1 year 8 months ago
- Reading as a punishment 1 year 10 months ago
Recent blog posts
- Appreciating the ‘powerful good’ of the public library
- New Domain, New Blog
- A.I. as virtual research mediators
- Fed Life Working Without Pay
- Dismantling Utopia: How Information Ended the Soviet Union
- Cites & Insights December 2018 (18:9) available
- Cites & Insights 18:7 (October 2018) available
- Cites & Insights 18:6 (September 2018) available
- Apparently Alex Jones isn't totally silenced
- Cites & Insights 18.5 (August 2018) available
Re: Too many branches
ExecDirector Podgajny didn't close those branches because they were superfluous or unwanted -- he was forced to close them because there was no money to keep them open. He's doing the best with what he has, which is (effectively) less and less every year. The Reiche neighborhood fought to save its branch, and the Riverton neighborhood is now doing the same. Riverton is isolated; many of its patrons (especially kids) won't be able to reach another PPL branch. Volunteers cannot fully replace librarians. Portable libraries cannot entirely replace full-service libraries. The fact that Portland is better-served by its library system than many other cities of its size should be a matter of pride. Nobody benefits when a library closes.