The question of what we can and can't see when we go hunting for answers demands a transparent, participatory solution. There's no dictator benevolent enough to entrust with the power to determine our political, commercial, social and ideological agenda. This is one for The People.
The European Union's executive body will study plans by Google to make millions of books available online after Germany said the Internet company's project flouts EU copyright law.
The bloc's industry ministers agreed on Thursday to ask the European Commission to look at how Google's settlement with authors in the United States affect writers' rights in the EU.
Story one: New Web site to amplify debate on Google book deal
Caroline Vanderlip believes the escalating debate over Google Inc.'s plans for a vast Internet library of copyright-protected literature will yield enough compelling material to fill a book.
That's one reason why SharedBook Inc., a 5-year-old company run by Vanderlip, has set up a Web site so the supporters and opponents of Google's digital book project can more easily post their opinions about a legal settlement that will help fulfill or possibly derail the Internet search leader's ambitions.
The site, http://www.gbs.sharedbook.com, is set to debut Thursday. Full article here.
Story two: EU to study how Google Books impact authors
As seen on Identi.ca:
1. segphault: I'm really enamored with the Google Wave concept. It's a federated communication system with an open protocol! http://is.gd/ImYj
2. alphakamp: @segphault I really dont see why/what they are doing, isnt this essentially what !omb is? why do this but drop jaiku?
3. segphault: @alphakamp: Wave isn't a replacement for OMB. It's a completely different kind of communication. Lots of potential for integrating the two.
4. alphakamp: @segphault ah now that makes sense, glad someone could interpret better than I can, #googlewave
This just in from the Electronic Frontier Foundation with most of their call shown after the "read more" jump: -- Read More
We are putting together a group of authors (or their heirs or assigns) who are concerned about the Google Book Search settlement and its effect on the privacy and anonymity of readers.
In a move that could blunt some of the criticism of Google for its settlement of a lawsuit over its book-scanning project, the company signed an agreement with the University of Michigan that would give some libraries a degree of oversight over the prices Google could charge for its vast digital library.
Google has faced an onslaught of opposition over the far-reaching settlement with authors and publishers. Complaints include the exclusive rights the agreement gives Google to publish online and to profit from millions of so-called orphan books, out-of-print books that are protected by copyright but whose rights holders cannot be found.
Forcing Google to delete user data after six months could dent its ability to predict pandemics such as swine flu, said the search giant's co-founder.
Larry Page said he thought more debate was needed around the issue of storing user data.
Brewster Kahle: If approved, the settlement would produce not one but two court-sanctioned monopolies. Google will have permission to bring under its sole control information that has been accessible through public institutions for centuries. In essence, Google will be privatizing our libraries.
From article by Paul Boutin:
My entire workday takes place inside a browser window. Web-based email. Web-based chat. Web-based blog editor. Web-based billing system. Instead of watching my PC’s desktop sputter, I spend a lot of time impatiently waiting for my Firefox browser to load pages.
Or I did, until I took a chance on Google’s new browser, Chrome. My instant reaction: Holy heck! This thing is fast!
Get Chrome here.