Canadian Election and FLOSS/Digital Copyright

russell writes "The Digital Copyright Canada forum and the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC) are working to make Internet, Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) and digital copyright issues during the current election.

In 2001, with the help of the EFF, we were able to generate approximately 650 of the 700 written replies that the government received to their consultation. Our replies all opposed the DMCA being brought into Canada.

Unfortunately Parliament has not been listening to us. Recent reports from parliamentary committees have directed government to immediately ratify the WIPO treaties that were implemented as the DMCA in the USA.

We need to get louder, and letting candidates know during elections that this is important to us is one important way to send a message. Canadians should be proactive and ensure that their candidates know where they stand on these issues. Both CIPPIC and the Digital Copyright Canada forum have questions for Candidates which can help you find out where they stand.

Issues we are getting answers from parties and candidates about include: Music File-sharing, Technological Protection of Copyright Materials, Educational Use of Internet Materials, ISP Liability for copyright infringement, Open Source Software, SPAM, and National ID cards.

If you are one of those 40% of Canadians that don't vote, please consider getting involved this time. Protecting the Internet and FLOSS from bad government policy is an important reason to vote!"


Checking on the Neighbor's Campaign Donations

InfoWhale sends "this article from the New York Times titled "Politics: Checking on the Neighbors' Campaign Donations". If you are curious about your neighbors' political donations,
a new website, Fundrace.org lists political donations in your hometown, address by
address. While the chronically nosy in your neighborhood are giddy, not everyone is so pleased.


Brown v. Board of Education. Still far to go in Librarianship..

Kathleen McCook writes "On May 17, 2004 the nation celebrates the landmark case, Brown v. Board of Education. In Derrick Bell's new book, SILENT COVENANTS: BROWN V.BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE UNFULFILLED HOPES FOR RACIAL REFORM the results to today are explored. The deliberate speed was at a snail's pace in many places and defacto segregation in Boston continued for decades after Brown.
In librarianship the profession's efforts to reflect the people we serve among our own numbers have been recently analyzed in the LJ study,"The Diversity Mandate" by Denice Adkins & Isabel Espinal(4/15/2004) where it is noted:"In the 1995–96 academic year only nine percent of MLS graduates were students of color. That number peaked at nearly 13 percent in 1999–2000. Since the Spectrum program was initiated, ten percent of all MLS graduates are librarians of color."
The American Library Association SPECTRUM scholar program has had a small and positive effect on greater diversity in librarianship. Yet we must not think on the eve of the 50th anniversary of Brown that ours is a profession that fully embraces this goal. The conservative library website blogger, Greg McClay, discussed SPECTRUM on May 13, 2004--

Since 1998 ALA has provided over 250 scholarships for $5000 in what can only be called a racist effort to increase the number of non-white librarians. Not just increase the number, but the fact that these people applied and received these scholarships means they believe their skin color has relevance to the profession that they have chosen. ALA has spent $1,250,000 perpetuating a very crude and ignorant concept.

In the United States we should be tolerant of all points of view but it is important to recognize that intolerant people offer smell tests."


How Do we Trust what we read - and share with patrons?

htp://search-engines-web.com/ writes "What standards or techniques do you use to filter out Bad information from Good - when gathering information for Patrons or Work-related projects, especially current events related?
A couple of stories to consider:
Reaction: Mirror editor sacked, from the BBC, and

Daily Mirror Apologizes for Fake Photos"

Update: 05/16 11:21 EST by B: hoaxes that fooled the worldly wise British media, from The Guardian takes a look back through the decades at the issue.

Iranian History Professor's Death Sentence Upheld

madcow writes "Fundamentalists in Iran are making it a tad harder to speak freely as this temporarily available article makes clear. "Mr. Aghajari is serving a four-year sentence at Tehran's notorious Evin prison....[T]he regional court that handed down the original death sentence has reaffirmed it. "The judge has ... maintained his original decision," said a court official. "There was nothing new in the file." Now it goes back again to the Iranian Supreme Court."

Librarians' Petition Against the Occupation of Iraq

Anonymous Patron writes to point us to a link for librarians who want to sign a petition against the occupation of Iraq.
It is entitled, "Librarians Say No to Occupation."
It is part of the Librarians for Peace website.


CO: Librarian to challenge Mitchell for state Senate

Gary D. Price wrote to let us know that there is a librarian running for state Senate in Colorado.
"The two men vying for the state Senate seat representing Broomfield, Adams and Weld counties champion much the same issues. Though ideologically, they fall on separate ends of the political spectrum, both cite education and business as high concerns for the state and the district.

Curt Darius Williams, a 35-year-old academic librarian from Westminster, is scheduled to announce his candidacy for state Senate District 23 on Saturday. He filed a letter of intent for the seat last month. He'll challenge Broomfield Republican Shawn Mitchell, who served three terms in state House District 33 before announcing his run for the senate seat. Williams has never held political office."

Study Finds a Nation of Polarized Readers

The NY Times has a story on Valdis Krebs, a social-network analyst in Cleveland.
Curious to learn something about consumers of political titles in a tense election year, in January he analyzed purchase patterns for political titles, using the Times's list and the Internet. First, he plugged titles from the list of The Times into Amazon.com and Barnes &Noble.com. Then, thanks to a "customers who bought this book also bought" feature on the Web sites, he was able to determine what other titles buyers had purchased at the same time. Following the links between titles, Mr. Krebs ended up with a list of 66 books.

Foreign Students Not Scared

tomeboy writes "It was about one year ago that I received an email from a past ALA president about the Patriot Act’s threat to foreign students enrolling in US colleges and universities. (I would have posted it here but I trashed it as I do all these “action alerts� I receive from this person.) Anyway the email predicted that tighter scrutiny with visas would have a negative impact on enrollments and the bottom lines of many schools. I replied back, anonymously of course, that tighter security might not be a bad idea as two of the nineteen hijackers on 9/11 had visa violations. I received a five word response, "Thank you for the information".

The following article from the Daily Illini states that the Patriot Act has not negatively affected enrollment of foreign students at the University of Illinois.

This article, as most PA articles, includes the obligatory bit about how the government could walk in a library .."and identify what books are being checked out and by what people." I am pleased to see that the reporter accurately said are being rather than have been checked out as this is an important distinction.
FWIW our college has not seen a decrease in foreign student enrollment as well."


t r u t h o u t - Bush Avoided Attacking Suspected Terrorist Mastermind

Fang-Face writes "Here's
a disturbing story about Bush administration anti-terrorism efforts. It has nothing to do with books or libraries, but given the high level of interest in the USA PATRIOT Act and homeland security here at LISNews, I believe it is pertinent to most of us. Homeland security is supposedly all about protecting The People. To that end, numerous law enforcement agencies have been amalgamated under umbrella organizations and civil liberties have come to be regarded as inconvenient commodities and unAmerican. The end to all this, is to ensure that terrorists don't get another shot at the U.S., it's territories, colonies, and possessions. I have questioned the validity of these arguments under the viewpoint that anti-terrorism measures can only be as effective as the agents who pursue them. This article makes a very strong point in my favour. The story is by Jim Miklaszewski of NBC News, and reprinted at Truthout.org."



Subscribe to Politics