- LISWire: Brill and Semantico announce Brill's Primary Sources platform
- LISWire: Top Ranked International University Chooses EBSCO Discovery Service
- LISWire: OCLC and Yelp increase visibility of libraries on the Web
On Wednesday, just as the Senate passed sweeping new legislation to modernize a 30 year old federal surveillance law, President Bush signaled that he would swiftly veto a bill approved by the House earlier in the day that would overhaul the Presidential and Federal Records Act to ensure emails and other government documents are preserved in the age of the Internet.
The measure was passed by a vote of 286-137, more than a year after several Senate and House investigations discovered that the Bush administration apparently purged millions of emails and that dozens of administration officials used email accounts maintained by the Republican National Committee to conduct official White House business in what appeared to be a violation of the Presidential Records Act.
Cross Posted from Free Government Information because the non-docs folks here might benefit as well.
Government Information librarians have acquired a lot of expertise. We've written a lot of guides and pathfinders to government information.
The Government Documents Roundtable (GODORT) of ALA has been collecting these handouts for years so we docs librarians wouldn't have to reinvent the wheel every time we needed to create a handout or give someone a starting point for research. Recently, this GODORT "Handout Exchange" has been wikified at http://wikis.ala.org/godort/index.php/Exchange.
The Handout Exchange is divided into four areas:
Because the Handout Exchange links to many resources that could help many people outside the depository community, FGI is proud to start a new "Guide of the Week" column to highlight these librarian generated resources.
Our first highlight is from the subject guide page:
Afro-Americans and the Military, 1939-45 (Denise Schoene, Univ. of Michigan, 1997) Last updated 8/6/2004
This guide provides a number of resources to the history of African Americans during this period including: -- Read More
BoinBoing Notes they have released 619,000 pages of histories, which were the pilot project scans they conducted. Looking at this data shows just how incredibly valuable these legislative histories are and how wonderfully talented the government employees are who compiled the information. The bad news is the government *gave* millions of dollars worth of help to Thomson West which is raking in the bucks with the big database.
This Site Has All the details.
Alex Heard, the editorial director of Outside magazine at Slate:
But isn't the FBI destroying only junk? I doubt it. Ernie Lazar, an independent researcher in California whose particular interest is in far-right groups, sent me a list of "destroyed" responses he's received over the years from FBI headquarters and field offices. There are dozens. We'll never know if they were significant—they don't exist anymore—but they sure look interesting to me.
SLA has applauded the U.S. Government Accountability Office's recent report on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's library closures. The report was requested by the U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee last year following an outcry by the public and the library community over the destruction of sensitive documents and restriction of access to public health information contained in the EPA libraries. "SLA was the first library association to denounce the closures in February 2006, and we have continued to work diligently to ensure that the concerns of our members and the public's best interest are considered and appropriately addressed in the EPA's strategy and operations plans going forward," said SLA CEO Janice R. Lachance.
In response to the revelations about White House e-mail practices, members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee have introduced the Electronic Communications Preservation Act. The bill would direct the Archivist of the United States to issue regulations that require federal agencies to preserve electronic records — especially e-mail messages — in an electronic format.
Current National Archives and Records Administration regulations permit agencies to preserve electronic records by storing them in an electronic format or printing them on paper and saving the paper. Agencies almost universally choose the paper option if they preserve their electronic records at all.
The EPA is seeking comment of how they can best work with the public to share information. The person that passed on this story had the following comment:
Thought you all would be interested to see this. Given EPA's haste in closing many of their libraries and how goofy they are being about reinstating them - well it doesn't appear that the "public" is responding very quickly.
EPA call for input here.
Link to comment from person that suggested this story for LISNEWS is here.
The next eight years will be critical ones for the National Archives. As they prepare for a Presidential transition that will add to the more than 10 billion pages of documents they already hold, they'll also deal with funding issues and technology advances that will change the way they do business. The Archives says their mission is "to ensure the public can discover, use, and learn from the records of their Government," and they are circulating a document of their own to plan to keep doing just that.
Ithaca Journal reports A report released last week demands the attention of our state Legislature and governor as New York moves forward in the digital age.
The report, “A Strategy for Openness: Enhancing E-Records Access in New York State,” sets a game plan for the state to ensure New York's government documents are accessible to citizens as the state continues to produce information electronically.
The "Big Scrape": This Time, You're on Your Own: The "big scrape" of government web sites won't be happening this year. And watchers of government records collection are not happy.
The National Archives announced that they will not conduct an "open harvest" of federal agency web sites, as they did in 2000 and 2004. Each of those years, NARA "scraped" agency sites to record what those sites looked like and what information they contained at the end of a presidential term (the second Clinton and first Bush 43 terms). Now NARA is saying that they won't do such a chore in 2008.