- LISWire: Marvin Memorial Library Live on Evergreen joins COOL
- LISWire: Library Journal and NoveList Announce the LibraryAware Community Award Recipients
- LISWire: Media Alert: Brill’s Journal of Early American History now included in SCOPUS
Bonnie Petersen was kind enough to send in This Story from The Denver Post about the new JonesKnowledge.com site. They says the site will have research guidance, reference assistance, links to periodicals, government documents, scholarly works and almost anything else needed to complete a master\'s thesis or other research project. Now here is the cool part, A group of 40 librarians will be on hand 14 hours a day to help with research
ZDNet has a Report on Two Internet users who successfully
defended themselves in a trial over internet free-speech.
\"Inherent in First Amendment protections is the right to
speak anonymously in diverse contexts,\" the judge wrote.
This seems to be the first time courst have ruled in favor
of the \"secret\" posters on message boards.
IMP Magazine has an interesting Story on the growth of the internet, trying to set things straight. Is it true that Internet traffic is doubling every three months? Maybe, maybe not, they try clear up some common myths.
\"At this rate, traffic would be increasing by a factor of 16 per year. Hence, from the end of 1994 to the end of 2000, it would have grown by a factor of almost 17 million.\"
\"\"The paper essentially argues that the Internet has not diffused throughout the world in a random way, but rather that there are systematic patterns to its spread\"
\"The Internet\'s gain in stature as an information resource has been the reference librarian\'s loss.
After all, the library isn\'t the first place most people think of when they need a digital gateway to information.\"
Now ask yourself, whose fault is that?
Whose fault is it that people even need to ask this question-
\"With all these commercial online reference services, will librarians become obsolete?\"
Here\'s an interesting one from interactionarchitect.com on how \"skeptical Internet users\" are using the internet. Skeptical Internet Users are those who are motivated by the Internet\'s promise of offering value, not by how cool it is. They don\'t use search engines, that is too much work, they just check out a few web sites regularly. They are unforgicing and ready to never visit your site again! Sounds like they need to visit a library and ask for some help!
This News.com Story on The Collaborative Digital Reference Service (CDRS) is quite interesting. The trial run began Friday, about 60 libraries took questions from library patrons. The first question sent through CDRS came from a library in England and was answered in Santa Monica, CA. The question asked for the most recent books published in English about ancient Byzantine cuisine.
\"Rather than watch idly as Internet companies like AskJeeves, Google or Yahoo fill the void, librarians believe their expertise, research collections and specialized catalogs not available on the Internet enable them to answer questions quickly and completely--for free.\" -- Read More
Here\'s a really cool site sent in by Bob Cox. The Internet Search FAQ covers all the bases, \"how can I find\", \"how can I find it faster?\", \"should I pay?\", and \"where can I get help?\", are all covered.
\"Although this website was compiled originally for writers, it has become increasingly clear that this FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) list is of use to anyone who wants to find their way around the Net. \"
Wired is reporting The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has narrowed the field down to 10 finalists in the race to become the new DOT-COM! Check out the final TLD\'s and the folks sponsoring them.
Brian writes \"thestandard.com is one place reporting on ICANN\'s plans for the new TLDs.
\"staff of ICANN recommended Friday that no new top-level domains distinguishing between kid-friendly and kid-unfriendly material be added to the Internet at this time.\" \"
They got 44 proposals on new names, and say only 17 of those are being considered.
\"Because of the inadequacies in the proposed technical and business measures to actually promote kid-friendly content, the evaluation team does not recommend selecting a dot-kids domain in the current phase of the TLD program,\" the staff report said. \"In addition, because of the controversy surrounding, and poor definition of the hoped-for benefits of dot-xxx, we also recommend against its selection at this time.\"