Journals & Magazines

Cites & Insights 5:2 (Midwinter) available

Walt writes " Cites & Insights 5.2, Midwinter 2005, is now available for downloading.

This 22-page issue (PDF as always), with a fresh new look (dating back to 1919), includes:

  • Trends & Quick Takes: The hazy crystal ball, a roundup of projections regarding technology (including library tech trends), plus a few quicker takes
  • Bibs & Blather: Why the Midwinter Issue? Why this issue's ready now--and some notes about the format changes. (My alma mater has great taste in typefaces!)
  • Interesting & Peculiar Products: DualDisc (DVD Audio reborn?), more on the OQO, "iPod's big brother," and more.
  • Looking Back 2: Trends and Perspectives, 2001-2004: The rest of the retrospective, covering the first 56 issues of Cites & Insights


New issue of First Monday available

The January issue of First Monday is available:

"Artists’ earnings and copyright: A review of British and German music industry data in the context of digital technologies" by Martin Kretschmer

"What’s the Buzz about? An empirical examination of Search on Yahoo!" by Nicole Bladow, Cari Dorey, Liz Frederickson, Pavla Grover, Yvette Knudtson, Sandeep Krishnamurthy, and Voula Lazarou

"Sensible design principles for new networks and services" by Kalevi Kilkki

"The penguin in peril: SCO’s legal threats to Linux" by Ishtiaque Omar

"Can many agents answer questions better than one?" by Boris Galitsky and Rajesh Pampapathi

Cornell Study on Open Access

Anonymous Patron writes "The Task Force on Open Access Publishing from Cornell Report on OA. They say Alternative publishing models that would offer free and unimpeded access to scholarship promise both a more affordable system for academic institutions and their libraries and a more democratic one for readers and authors."

Program/conference reports invited

Walt writes "Here's the posting I just sent to four lists, and will also be suggesting as a story--but here, it has HTML!

Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large , a free web-based journal of libraries, policy, technology and media, is now accepting and inviting program and conference reports in areas appropriate for C&I's readership.

It's a chance to be published in a widely-read venue, with as little editing as possible, with a byline--and in a timely fashion (aiming for 2 to 6 weeks between receipt of reports and publication).

Full details are at the Reporting page of C&I.

If you're not a C&I reader, take a look at one or two issues ( will lead you to all of them); it never makes sense to contribute to a publication you don't read or understand!

And if you're unsure whether a program or conference is "appropriate," or have questions that the site doesn't answer, just drop me a line: [email protected]

Thanks--and I look forward to seeing, editing, and publishing your reports!"

Cites & Insights 5.1 available

Walt writes " Cites & Insights 5.1 (January 2005), sponsored by YBP Library Services,
is now available for downloading.

The 22-page issue (PDF as always) includes:

  • Bibs & Blather: Sponsorship, notes on conference blogging, and why I'm
    not commenting on Google Library.
  • Perspective: The End of the Experiment (and the beginning of the
    journal). A transitional note.
  • Library Access to Scholarship: Notes on NIH's plans, the stalled
    situation in the UK, and a few short pieces.
  • Feedback: Your Insights: Ross E. Riker comments on "What's Wrong With
    You People?"
  • Perspective: Looking Back 1: Trends & Products, 1995-2000: An excerpt
    (and comment) from each issue of "Trailing Edge Notes" and "Crawford's
  • Copyright Currents: What didn't happen in Congress' lame-duck session,
    plus notes on DRM developments and the RIAA.

I'm looking for program and conference reporters. See
This Page for details."

Calls for Open Access Challenge Academic Journals

Anonymous Patron writes "One From OJR says Scholarly journals have avoided the market disruptions the Internet has wrought on the news, music and movie industries. But a NIH policy switch could change that."

Medical Publishers Propose Data Sharing

Anonymous Patron writes "Interesting article from the Wall Street Journal that seems to have snuck it's way on to the Web on a consortium of leading technical publishers called patientINFORM, includes the Elsevier unit of *Reed Elsevier *PLC, John
Wiley & Sons, Blackwell Publishing, and others.
The articles say they are alarmed by a government proposal to make biomedical journal articles
more widely and freely available, so the scientific publishing industry has
crafted an alternative plan to distribute some of its content free of
charge to consumers.
The Annoucement can be found on the website"

Internet upstarts v traditional publishers

Anonymous Patron writes "The Financial Times Looks At the growing number of scientific journals have adopted an open access model and the Directory of Open Access Journals now lists more than 1,300 journals. Open access publishers, such as BioMed Central, recognise that there should be no barriers to access in order to maximise the impact of scientific research. Open access publishers tend to cover their costs via a charge for processing articles that is paid by an author’s institution or funder - hence the “author-pays� tag for this model."

Scientists, Consider Where You Publish

An Anonymous Patron writes "Scientists, Consider Where You Publish: For scientists, publishing a paper in a
respected peer-reviewed journal marks the
culmination of successful research. But
some of the most prestigious and sought after
journals are so costly to access that a
growing number of academic libraries can't
afford to subscribe. Before submitting your
next manuscript, consider a journal's
access policy alongside its prestige - and
weigh the implications of publishing in
such costly periodicals."

Publishers Oppose Plan For Free Access To Scientific Research

Lee Hadden writes "A fight is brewing in the scientific world over whether articles published
in expensive scholarly journals ought to be widely available for free on the
The National Institutes for Health has proposed that any scientist whose
work is funded by NIH research-grant money and later published should make
it available on a public NIH-sponsored Internet site. The reasoning: It's
taxpayer-funded research, so fellow scientists, doctors, patients, students
and others should have free access to it within six months of publication --
which alarms publishers. The NIH has asked for public comment until Nov. 16.
Patient-advocacy groups back the proposal, arguing that too often the latest
scientific findings are off-limits to the average citizen. An annual
subscription to one of these journals costs between $200 and $6,000.
Among the proposal's supporters are 25 Nobel laureates who have written to
Congress stating: "When a woman goes online to find what treatment options
are available to battle breast cancer, the cutting-edge, peer-reviewed
research remains behind a high-fee barrier. Families looking to read
clinical trial updates for a loved one with Huntington's disease search in
vain -- because they do not have a journal subscription."
While some publishers had hoped the "open access" movement would fade, they
are now worried by the plan and are launching a counter-offensive to protect
the lucrative scientific, technical and medical publishing industry. About
half of the industry's $10 billion in revenue comes from such publications.
Today, several publishers are scheduled to meet privately with NIH Director
Elias Zerhouni to urge him to proceed slowly on the proposal. "Feelings are
running very high about this," says John Regazzi, an executive of the
Elsevier unit of Reed Elsevier Group PLC, the Anglo-Dutch publishing giant
and the biggest player in the field with about 20% of the market. "The
notion that publicly funded research should be publicly available is a good
one. But is this really the right solution?"

Read more about it at: or on other library
newspaper jobbers such as ProQuest.""


Subscribe to Journals & Magazines