Patriot Act

Prosecutors Appeal Patriot Act Gag Order Ruling

The Reader's Shop writes "The Stamford Advocate reports

that federal prosecutors appealed a federal judge's decision to lift a gag order on librarians who received an FBI demand for records about library patrons under the Patriot Act.

The appeal, filed in U.S. District Court in Bridgeport, will be considered by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

See Also Newsdayt"

The PATRIOT Act in Three Parts

A good long look at PATRIOT from The San Mateo County Times. They ran a three-day series looking at the impact and controversy over the Patriot Act and its second revision that awaits President Bush's signature. :
Terror fight meets privacy concerns
Booksellers at fore of Patriot Act fights
A lot of myths tied to powers under the Act

Even the libraries can't escape expanded powers to spy

This story comes from the Star Ledger in NJ about the Associate Director, Karen Avenick, at South County Regional Library System and when the Police called on the library on October 12, 2001 to demand library records and several computers.

Lawyer Points To 9/11-College Link

An Anonymous Patron points to a An AP Piece that reports a federal prosecutor said Two of the Sept. 11 hijackers used a public-access computer at a New Jersey college library to buy tickets for the plane they seized and crashed into the Pentagon. Ken Wainstein, U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, made the disclosure Thursday during a congressional hearing in which the Bush administration pushed for renewal of provisions of the Patriot Act that make it easier for investigators to obtain library and other records.

Judge Rules Vs. U.S. in Patriot Act Case

The Associated Press reports A federal judge lifted a gag order Friday that shielded the identity of librarians who received an FBI demand for records about library patrons under the Patriot Act.

U.S. District Court Judge Janet Hall ruled in favor of the American Civil Liberties Union, which argued that the gag order prevented their client from participating in a debate over whether Congress should reauthorize the Patriot Act.

MI City Council Patriot Act resolution rejected

The Grand Rapids Press Reports The City Council on Tuesday rejected a resolution expressing concern with sections of the federal Patriot Act.

The resolution was proposed by the city's Human Relations Commission and on put on the agenda Wednesday by Councilman David Hoekstra.

The council rejected the resolution 5-2, with only the 6th Ward councilman Hoekstra and Councilman At-Large Jerome Kobes voting in favor. Mayor Al McGeehan and 2nd Ward Victor Orozco were absent.

CA City Council Opposes Portions Of Patriot Act

Gazette Newspapers - Long Beach,CA, Reports Long Beach has joined a growing list of cities that have officially opposed portions of the United States Patriot Act.

Tuesday night, the City Council unanimously voted to send a letter in support of a State Senate resolution urging the government to repeal some recently extended parts of the Patriot Act to "ensure that civil liberties are protected."

Librarian Speaks of Fear of Imprisonment

Fang-Face writes "An
ACLU news release posted at CommonDreams.org tells how papers, which were ordered unsealed by the judge in the case, include three affidavits and a legal brief. One of those affidavits was filed by a librarian who was "charged with educating the library community and general public about intellectual freedom." This lawsuit challenges the National Security Letter provision of USAPA, which authorizes the FBI to demand a range of personal records without court approval, including library records and the identify of people who have used library computers."

FBI's Pursuit of Library Records Challenged

U.S. District Court Judge Janet Hall held a hearing on Wednesday for the Connecticut librarian involved with a PATRIOT request in Connecticut. U.S. Attorney Kevin O'Connor urged Hall to consider the government's interest and public policy demands for maintaining secrecy.
Hall said she would issue a ruling next week on the ACLU's motion for a preliminary injunction. Whichever way Hall rules, one or both of the parties is likely to take the matter to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Connecticut Post has some details, as does The NY Times,

At Stake in Court...

The New York Times introduces the story this way: "It was a hearing where the name of the client was never disclosed, the subject of the federal inquiry remained unidentified and the context for the exercise was kept top secret."

It was of course a hearing on the use of the Patriot Act in a unknown Connecticut library. The Patriot Act is no longer an untried theory, but a genuine tool of investigation, which some find reprehensible, some find necessary.

Syndicate content