Patriot Act

Anger as CIA Homes in on New Target: Library Users

Two stories on the signs at the Santa Cruz public library.
Anger as CIA Homes in on New Target: Library Users and Librarians try to alter Patriot Act both cover the signs, posted in the 10 county branches last week and on the library's Web site, also inform the reader that the USA Patriot Act "prohibits library workers from informing you if federal agents have obtained records about you," as well as the USA Patriot Act.

"I'm not reading anything they'd be particularly interested in, but that's not the point," said Ari Avraham of Santa Cruz. "This makes me think of Big Brother."

Feds can access your reading lists

"Local librarians are looking for ways to continue protecting a patron’s right to privacy in spite of what they say is the federal government’s meddling ways."

"I believe very, very strongly what you read is your own damn business," said Sherm Pridham, executive director of the Portsmouth Library."

"Local librarians are considering posting signs to warn patrons that records of the books they borrow may wind up in the hands of federal agents, a move that is similar to what libraries in Santa Cruz, Calif., have already done. At least one local librarian is also considering erasing library records in order to further protect a citizens’ right to keep what they read private."

"Ignorance breeds fear, and libraries are here to dispel ignorance," said librarian Carolyn Marvin of the William Fogg Library in Eliot, Maine. "It would be a shame to have people afraid to access information that they need in their lives." (from The Portsmouth Herald)

Rep. John W. Olver pushes change to Patriot Act

Both progressive liberals and conservatives who
believe in a minimalist federal government are moving
to repeal a section of the USA Patriot Act passed in the
wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that allows federal
agents to pull readers' records for little more than
curiosity.
MA Rep. John W. Olver is backing the Freedom to
Read Protection Act, a bill by Rep. Bernard Sanders, I-
Vt., to end the chance federal agents may be checking
your reading list.
Full Story

"This bill would return some of the safeguards
that were in place before passage of the Patriot Act by
exempting libraries and booksellers from provisions
that allow the federal government access to records
without a traditional search warrant," Olver said.

Libraries post Patriot Act warnings

"Along with the usual reminders to hold the noise down and pay overdue fines, library patrons in Santa Cruz are seeing a new type of sign these days: a warning that records of the books they borrow may wind up in the hands of federal agents."

"The signs, posted in the 10 county branches last week and on the library's Web site, also inform the reader that the USA Patriot Act "prohibits library workers from informing you if federal agents have obtained records about you."

"Questions about this policy," patrons are told, "should be directed to Attorney General John Ashcroft, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530." (from The San Fransisco Chronicle)

Congressman Sanders Introduces Patriot Act Amendment

"At a press conference held today in Washington, D.C., Congressman Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced federal legislation that would remove a threat to the privacy of bookstore and library records, created by the USA Patriot Act. At present, the proposed amendment, called the Freedom to Read Protection Act of 2003, has 24 co-sponsors, including Ron Paul (R-TX)."

"Chris Finan, president of the American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression (ABFFE), hailed the amendment. "While booksellers strongly support efforts to fight terrorism, the Patriot Act gives federal authorities virtually unchecked authority to search our customers' records and raises concern that government is monitoring what people are reading," said Finan. "The Freedom to Read Protection Act will restore faith in the confidentiality of these records without harming national security." (from Bookselling This Week)

Librarians as FBI Extension Agents

Laurie writes "The author of this story takes Mitch Freedman and ALA to task for failing to encourage acts of civil disobedience by librarians when the FBI comes aknockin'.


"While American Library Association President, Mitch Freedman and the ALA have consistently protested these developments, they have stopped far short of using their ethical code as a moral justification for refusing to cooperate with the FBI. While some librarians and some members of the American Library Association have expressed discomfort in assisting the FBI's invasion of our privacy-as yet there is no articulated public voice advocating librarians to undertake acts of civil disobedience when the FBI comes to call."


Read The Article Here, from Counter Punch."

Library Changes Policy over Release of User Information

The Associated Press Says The St. Louis Public Library has changed the policy that late last year allowed an FBI agent to walk out of a library branch with patrons' computer sign-up sheets without a court order.
Under the revised policy approved by the library board Feb. 3, such sign-up sheets will be deemed private records and will only be turned over to law enforcers under a court order, spokesman Gerald Brooks said. Brooks said a St. Louis law firm that counsels the board advised board members to make the change.

Warning signs to be posted at libraries

Santa Cruz, California, is among the first library systems in the nation to warn patrons about the ramifications of the PATRIOT Act. Signs to be posted at library branches in Santa Cruz County and on the library Web site will inform people that records of books and other materials borrowed from the library may be obtained by federal agents.
Librarians in other communities have decided against warning signs, for fear the signs might have a \"chilling effect\" on library use. Here, library board members concluded the Patriot Act has a \"chilling effect\" of its own and that the public has a right to know.

Here\'s The Full, Chilly, Story, and One On Santa Cruz, California, area booksellers, who say they are keeping traceable information at a minimum. That’s good news for civil rights advocates, who say people shouldn’t have to worry about \"The Anarchist Cookbook\" they picked up on a whim or the history of Hamas they bought a friend for Christmas.

Defending the Bill of Rights

Bob Cox sent along This Look At The PATRIOT Act, Etc... from Alternet.

They say Committees to Defend the Bill of Rights exist in about 150 municipalities and counties around the country, and so far 36 cities, towns or counties have passed resolutions in defense of the Bill of Rights.

"So many people are understandably frightened by the risk of terrorist attacks that they are all too willing to believe they will be safer if the president just passes another anti-terror law," he said. "They lose sight of what they're giving up."

<i>Nation</i> reporter exposes "Patriot Act's Big Brother"

In this story in The Nation, author David Cole talks about recently leaked plans for a next-generation Patriot Act called the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (DSEA). Here are a few chilling quotes from his article:

If the Patriot Act was so named to imply that those who question its sweeping new powers of surveillance, detention and prosecution are traitors, the DSEA takes that theme one giant step further. It provides that any citizen, even native-born, who supports even the lawful activities of an organization the executive branch deems "terrorist" is presumptively stripped of his or her citizenship....

They would then be subject to the deportation power, which the DSEA would expand to give the Attorney General the authority to deport any noncitizen whose presence he deems a threat to our "national defense, foreign policy or economic interests." One federal court of appeals has already ruled that this standard is not susceptible to judicial review. So this provision would give the Attorney General unreviewable authority to deport any noncitizen he chooses, with no need to prove that the person has engaged in any criminal or harmful conduct....

The bill would authorize secret arrests, a practice common in totalitarian regimes but never before authorized in the United States. It would terminate court orders barring illegal police spying entered before September 11, 2001, without regard to the need for judicial supervision. It would allow secret government wiretaps and searches without even a warrant from the supersecret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when Congress has authorized the use of force. And it would give the government the same access to credit reports as private companies, without judicial supervision....

Syndicate content