Despite an enduring love for paper, most of my reading these days is done
on computer screens. The sci-fi computer screen of tomorrow teases
my imagination. Hold it, bend it, maybe even turn it\'s pages?
Mark it up, then save your highlighting and notes right (write?-) on the
computer screen, and then with a magic shake, like an old etch-a-sketch,
make all your notes disappear so you can read the original document, yet
still have those notes saved somewhere in the ether?
Peek: The Computer Screen of the Future,\" from NewsFactor.com
looks at LEP, light-emitting
polymer [google], that \"because it can be made on flexible plastic
substrates, it not only could be extremely difficult to break, but also
could be molded into different shapes and contours.\"
we ready for digital paper,\" takes a look at a pen
and paper combo that copies what\'s written as a digital picture.
LLRX writes \"
Sheryl Cramer suggests dozens of software applications that will enable you and your office to be productive and efficient without breaking the bank. She covers firewall/virus protestion, utilities for e-mail, chat, faxing, graphics, MAC utilities, entertainment and lots more. In the April 1, 2002 issue of LLRX.com at Technology For Tightwads, Part II \"
CNET Has A Story on a new service called \"ebrarian\", that lets people read articles and books online for free but charges them to copy text or print pages.
EBrary will announce The Bibliographical Center for Research, which serves the western United States; Palinet, which serves the mid-Atlantic region; New England-based Nelinet; the Michigan Library Consortium; Wisconsin Library Services; and Ohio\'s Ohionet. Ebrary said the networks will distribute its online research service to 6,000 libraries in the United States, beginning with a 30-day trial in April.
\"There\'s a vulnerability for all of these (online research) companies to be financially successful,\" said Marti Harris, research director for Gartner. \"These digital content providers and relationships are very important and essential for research as part of the whole library collection, (but) they\'re not going to be replacing the traditional libraries...We\'re a long way off from having a totally online library.\"
1. Do you care if a few giant companies control virtually all entertainment and information?
2. Do you care if they decide what kinds of technological innovations will reach the marketplace?
3. Would you be concerned if they used their power to compile detailed dossiers on everything you read, listen to, view and buy?
4. Would you find it acceptable if they could decide whether what you write and say could be seen and heard by others?\"
steven bell writes \"Forbes has a good, if brief, interview with John Seely Brown, co-author of The Social Life of Information. Brown was asked his opinion on whether print books will be replaced with electronic ones. Here is part of what Brown had to say. \"A book lets you skim through it, rapidly thumbing through the contents. The design of the book, the heft, the paper, tell you a lot. Right now we have no idea of what the affordances are with e-books. Eventually we\'ll find them.\"
Read the interview \"
If you\'ve never read The Social Life of Information stop what you doing now and go read it.
Someone writes \"The Twinsburg Public Library, Ohio, just installed a dry copper line between their branch and the main building. This is the equivalent of a DSL line at $20 a month. What makes it interesting is their SysAdmin is a Linux protegee trying to keep the local monopoly at bay. His story is posted Here, fore those trying to hook a branch to the main buildin for cents on the dollar.
Ask about his use of ThinkNICs as OPAC terminals. \"
LLRX writes \"The Reference Interview Online: A Cyber Dialog From Beginning to End
Robyn Rebollo focuses on the transition from research assignments that were once assigned in-person or by telephone now being processed via email. The online dialogs that result from this process require that that all parties involved provide as much detail as possible to facilitate a successful outcome. See The Full Story \"
Research made possible by digital versions of the Library of Congress\' copy of the Gutenberg Bible has raised questions about the true origins of movable type:
When people think about the printing revolution, one name comes to mind: Johannes Gutenberg. But what if Gutenberg didn\'t actually invent the revolutionary technique of mass-producing words as we know it today? Scholars will soon get a chance to examine in exquisite detail what is considered the first book printed with moveable type. A project is currently underway at the Library of Congress to digitize its copy of the Gutenberg Bible . . .
Digitization has already allowed scholars to question Gutenberg\'s work. Last year, a pair of scholars used digital imaging and computer analysis to come up with their own conclusions about Gutenberg\'s method. Princeton librarian Paul Needham and scholar Blaise Agüera y Arcas discovered discrepancies between individual letters in Gutenberg\'s work, casting doubts on his techniques . . .
It was meant to be a showcase for Britain\'s electronic prowess - a computer-based, multimedia version of the Domesday Book. But 16 years after it was created, the £2.5 million BBC Domesday Project has achieved an unexpected and unwelcome status: it is now unreadable.
The special computers developed to play the 12in video discs of text, photographs, maps and archive footage of British life are - quite simply - obsolete.
Business Week has This Story on Brewster Kahle, the guy behind Alexa, and the Internet Archive.
Now he\'s trying to develop tools that will make it easier to use the archive to answer involved questions and to expand its content to include digital copies of radio programs, TV shows, and copies of books that are in the public domain.
Of course now it\'s illegal to build a digital library.