To be clear, I’m not talking about the ebook themselves; they are a perfectly fine media format. But the continuous need of comparison of the two formats (electronic versus physical) is just plain stupid. Perhaps, as both an emerging market and medium, people feel the need to make this examination constantly. However, it’s often a misrepresentation: it’s the capabilities of the ereader device being compared to the physical book, not the ebook itself. Ebooks, like physical books, do not have a great range of functionality or features in and of themselves. It’s the hype, the fear, the uncertainty of how the ebooks will change libraries that is just leading some pretty smart people to make some pretty dumb statements. Where is this notion of a threat to libraries coming from? -- Read More
Recent comments
2 hours 23 minutes ago
3 hours 40 minutes ago
4 hours 21 minutes ago
4 hours 54 minutes ago
21 hours 42 minutes ago
23 hours 49 minutes ago
1 day 10 minutes ago
1 day 58 minutes ago
1 day 8 hours ago
2 days 1 hour ago