Submitted by Blake on January 25, 2001 - 12:15pm
The NYTimes has an Interesting Story on search engines. They say regular search engines have access to only a fraction of 1 percent of what exists on the Web and as many as 500 billion pieces of content are missed. They talk about specialty search engines like Moreover, a site I use all the time for LISNews. It\'s nice to see some very positive things said about librarians in this one.
\"People may know to come to the library, but they probably do not know which reference books to pull off the shelf. Of course, in such cases, patrons can at least consult a reference librarian. On the Web, people are usually fending for themselves.\"
Submitted by Blake on January 25, 2001 - 12:07pm
Brian writes \"If you\'re looking for George W. Bush merchandise, there\'s an easy -- and, for half the country, intuitive -- way to find some on Google. Wired News has the
Here\'s the explanation, and if you want to try the search yourself, Try This.
Submitted by Blake on January 25, 2001 - 8:49am
Finally, A library you can drink!
The University of British Columbia is setting up a wine library, the wine industry is providing about $335,000 for the 1,264-square-foot Wine Research Library, and will have a capacity of 22,000 Canadian bottles, plus 8,000 bottles from other countries.Imagine the resume you\'ll need to be a librarian here.....
DJC.com has the Full Story
Submitted by Blake on January 24, 2001 - 6:03pm
Submitted by Blake on January 24, 2001 - 6:01pm
Diane Writes:This month\'s issue of Geotimes has a one page (p.5) comment from Sharon N.
Tahirkheli on \"Becoming Digital\" that is most intersting. She\'s Director
of Information Systems for the American Geological Institute.
She discusses the fact that some digital archivers consider adding only
originally digital material to their databases, ignoring digitised print
A quote: \"When libraries decide to eliminate unused books, it\'s called
weeding. Perhaps we\'re on the verge of weeding by default.\"
Submitted by Blake on January 24, 2001 - 12:33pm
Gerry McKiernan writes:
Based upon a review of E-journals for my new Web
registry, EJI(sm) I have concluded that the present-day
"Electronic Journal" is evolving to become what I call
"The Eclectic Journal".
By the "Eclectic Journal", I mean a Web-based resource
that at its core provides access to e-journals that offer not
only the conventional content of a digital form of a journal but
also provides or permits interaction with novel and innovative
_features and functionalities_ (e.g., reference linking, cross-publisher
searching, page customization, open peer review, etc.) _AND_
novel and innovative _content_ (e.g., e-Books, pre-publication
history, electronic discussions, translation services, e-prints,
bibliographic databases, etc.)
Submitted by Blake on January 24, 2001 - 11:21am
Submitted by AnnaKh on January 24, 2001 - 10:17am
As seen on the Freenet page and elsewhere, this essay by John Gilmore (of the EFF) explains why you should care about the efforts of industry to protect content through arbitrary technical means. Read it and send a copy to your colleagues. :)
Submitted by Blake on January 24, 2001 - 9:31am
The American School Board Journal has a nice Story on the different ways school libraries are changing to better meet the needs of their students.
\"I used to spend so much time wandering from table to table, policing kids and telling them to hush or leave,\" says a middle-school librarian in Vermont. \"Now I sit down with the kids and talk with them about books they\'re reading or reports they\'re writing. It\'s made a world of difference — for them and for me.\"
Submitted by Steven on January 23, 2001 - 9:04pm
On my daily perusal of the web, I came across a neat e-book site called Digital Worm. You can read the latest e-book news, look at the list archive, sign up for their newsletter, look at their e-book tools section, and much, much more, for the low cost of...$19.95...but wait there\'s more...
Submitted by Steven on January 23, 2001 - 8:56pm
My friend sent in this story from Wired. I don\'t mean to be crude, but the only difference between this game show and the \"actual\" daily life of a librarian is that the payoff is greater.\"Web Challenge has no rules regarding which search engine contestants use, or how many browser windows can be open simultaneously. Contestants bypass search engines and go directly to informational sites such as GolfDigest.com or the Internet Movie Database to get their answers. The first team to find the right answer wins $150. But if no one answers correctly within the two-minute time limit, the prize is forfeited.\"
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 8:36pm
Brian sent in
EX-President Clinton will be
spending a lot of his time on his presidential library. IT
systems that will make it nearly impossible to fully
catalog his administration. They have 40 million e-mail
messages alone, a mere 15% of the library has been
indexed after 12 years.
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 6:34pm
Public Information Campaign Announced to Free Schools and
Libraries from Blocking Technologies
A network of concerned organizations and prominent individuals
today released a joint statement opposing legislative requirements for school
and library Internet blocking technologies.
The statement came in response to legislation, signed into law as
part of an omnibus appropriations bill on December 21, 2000, which requires
all public schools and libraries participating in certain federal programs
to install Internet blocking technologies. The U.S. Congress passed the
blocking requirement contrary to the recommendations of a commission
studying the technology that was established as part of the earlier Child
Online Protection Act legislation.
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 6:18pm
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 6:11pm
Here\'s an Interesting Article by Joe Redman, no explanation by me needed.
\"American libraries, on the other hand, have a tradition of professed inclusion and equality. Mission statements and codes of ethics have fought against censorship and for intellectual freedom. Concerning persons with a disability however, libraries have shown an uncharacteristic conservative trend of exclusion, reflecting societies attitudes instead of setting an example for change. Libraries, from institutional to public, have often found themselves in the position of being the only contact many persons with a disability have with the outside world. Libraries have even had a tradition of subtle social activism. \"
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 4:03pm
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 1:30pm
The goal of the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (referred to as the OAI protocol in the remainder of this document) is to supply and promote an application-independent interoperability framework that can be used by a variety of communities who are engaged in publishing content on the Web. The OAI protocol described in this document permits metadata harvesting.
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 12:51pm
The Age has a Story on The Christian Outreach College on the Sunshine Coast (in Australia) banning Harry. The man in charge said he only had to read one chapter from the latest book - Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - and he had been exposed to four murders.
\"I believe these are dangerous stories, because the children are learning about murder and casting spells,\" Dr Gullo said.
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 12:47pm
The Houston Chronicle has a Story in which said Sarah Wahl, head librarian for the Goose Creek Independent School District says the publishers of those 12 textbooks that are full of errors should receive stiffer fines in an effort to curtail mistakes. A recent legislative change allowed the State Board of Education to levy fines totaling $80,500 against nine textbook publishers last year for failing to correct errors.
Submitted by Blake on January 23, 2001 - 10:38am
A Story from Herald-Review.com on the budget cuts approved by the Decatur school board last month that will reduce the number of librarians next year from 23 to three!
They say that\'s a savings of $389,000, quick, what\'s 389,000 divided by 20?
19,450, how\'s that for an average pay check?