Submitted by Blake on January 9, 2002 - 9:25am
Someone writes \"ZDNET Story on a company named NewsStand that delivers a digital version of the NYTimes and other, advertisements, classified ads, stock market listings and TV programs and all.
They say this could even have some far-reaching second-level impact on the content market and It shows us that we still have a lot to learn from printed publications, and that \"pure\" information isn\'t everything.
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 11:08pm
Laura Fosbender writes \"From October 2001 through September 2002, about 300 print journals, for which electronic access and publisher data are available, have been temporarily removed from the shelves of the nine campuses of the UC system.
During the course of the experiment, faculty and students will rely on the digital versions of these titles to meet their information needs.
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 7:32pm
Fiona writes \"Village Voice has an interesting article
on the death of independent bookstores in New York City at -
Rising rent seems to be the main reason for the closure of several stores.
\"Whatever the factors—rent spikes, chain domination, reading-allergic citizenry, publishers\' high price tags—it was hard for a bookstore lover not to notice all the closings in 2001. \"
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 6:10pm
Geoff Harder writes \"According to the Sunday January 6, 2002
edition of The Observer: \"Reed Elsevier, the Anglo-Dutch publisher, and Amsterdam-based rival Wolters Kluwer are expected to merge by the end of the year, according to investment bankers.\" A lot of power in the hands of a very few... The full story can be found Here.\"
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 4:57pm
Val writes \"The Village Voice\'s Nat Hentoff waxes nostalgic off about Joe McCarthy and his John Ashcroft, and that pesky ol\' Bill of Rights.
Full Story \"
See also, On the Public\'s Right to Know , The day Ashcroft censored Freedom of Information.
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 4:09pm
Submitted by Celine on January 8, 2002 - 3:54pm
This story from BBC News is reporting that the Public Record Office has had to take the England and Wales 1901 Census offline for a week while they try to improve the computer systems in order to cope with the huge demand.
As this earlier story reported, it went live last week and promptly got an average of about 30 million hits per day while they had only designed the site for a \"generous estimate\" of 1 million per day. It\'ll be back in a week, hopefully sleeker and ready to face its users but until then, it\'s probably more helpful not to provide a link to it here!
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 1:55pm
Whilest tolling through the comments I ran across librarianarchy\'s friends and enemies list, and it occured to me not everyone likes librarians.
Some people hate librarians, calling us bitter,
snappy, completely bitchy , or, mean & evil ,and we even smell of old books .
Some people hate us so much they\'ve written Poems about how much we suck.
Others Don\'t Like the ALA, but no one seems to Hate It.
Of course, there are pleanty of reasons to Hate Books.
Not to worry, we are also Loved, and so are Books [note: interesting search result].
[also note: I don\'t hate librarians, it\'s just a catchy title]
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 11:22am
Bob Cox sent along This Salon.com Story on Google\'s restoration of digital history and how some packrat mentality [you may think of that as librarianship] and a mountain of decaying mag tapes brought back some old messages.
Oreillynet has another story, as seen on slashdot.
There seems to be no shortage of Other USENT History info out there as well.
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 9:33am
Bob Cox pointed out Book Forager, they say \"Book Forager offers an easy way to find the kind of read you are looking for\".
It\'s a kind of wizard [not the D&D kind, but the install kind], that leeds you through choices, and finds a book based on what you entered.
You can choose things like, happy, sad, short, long, and so on.
Submitted by Blake on January 8, 2002 - 9:28am
Brynn passed along The Latest Word on the WA State library.
Gov. Gary Locke wants to shut it down in October as part of his plan to balance the state budget, which faces a $1.25 billion shortfall. And if the Legislature goes along with that proposal, as many as 134 full-time or part-time librarians could lose their jobs in a move that would save $5.5 million.
Submitted by Blake on January 7, 2002 - 8:19pm
Here\'s A Nice Little Story on all the nice things \"Friends\" do for libraries.
\"Libraries are so important to a community,\" Brown said. \"They give people a chance to read so many more books than they\'d be able to buy.\"
Submitted by Ryan on January 7, 2002 - 1:12pm
From the Washington Post:
Kids adore libraries. Where else can you find endless shelves filled with stories about curious monkeys, giant peaches, beanstalks and hungry caterpillars? The plastic library card and the responsibility of returning books on time is a rite of passage, one of many marking our entrance into the adult world.
Most adults, on the other hand, tend to favor the crisp, sanitized environs of chain book retailers, where one can flip through the latest John Grisham bestseller or fresh copies of Oprah-worthy selections while nursing coffee and biscotti.
I used to be among those latte-drinking, magazine-flipping masses, snubbing my modest neighborhood library until just a few months ago. Visions of musty stacks, an archaic Dewey Decimal System and intimidating librarians kept me from going, even though it\'s just half a block from my apartment . . .
Submitted by Blake on January 7, 2002 - 12:12pm
Marylaine passed along word that Rory got a mention in a Salon Story on Michael Moore\'s new book. Ann Sparanese, a librarian at Englewood Library in New Jersey gets the credit for starting the ball rolling.
\"When Michael Moore\'s publisher insisted he rewrite his new book to be less critical of President Bush, it took an outraged librarian to get it back in the stores.\"
Submitted by Blake on January 7, 2002 - 8:54am
americanpressinstitute and CNET both have year-end collections of stories on the dot.com bust, and how it has changed what we read for free on the web.
CNET notes To keep their businesses afloat, a number of dot.coms turned on the charm by giving advertisers just about anything they wanted, not a good sign.
Submitted by Blake on January 6, 2002 - 3:59pm
BusinessToday.com has a Sad Story on an unemployed librarian who is unable to find a job in her field with a salary to match what she had been earning previously, after being laid off. She made $65,000 a year at her previous job, and her husband just got laid off as well. She has taken a job as a field investigator for a company that performs background checks. She will begin earning $25,000 a year when she starts the job in February.
A fininacial planner provides some advice.
Submitted by Blake on January 6, 2002 - 2:58pm
ZWire is running This Story on the \"Series of Unfortunate Events\" series by author Lemony Snicket.
They say Snicket\'s \"Series of Unfortunate Events\" and Rowling\'s \"Harry Potter\" are becoming a tag-team of sorts as children go back and forth, reading and rereading the series. Both are accomplishing what few others could since Dr. Seuss - they\'re making reading cool.
Submitted by Blake on January 6, 2002 - 2:44pm
Here\'s a nifty site.
stopyourekillingme.com by Bonnie Brown, is a resource for the lovers of mystery, intrigue and suspense books. Stop! has hundreds of authors, with complete, chronological lists of their books in this sub-genre. This site has a straightforward format. The books are arranged by author, series character, and by date written.
Submitted by Ryan on January 5, 2002 - 11:47pm
. . . or so reports The Times\' Derwent May:
When it opened in November 1997, the exterior seemed rather disappointing. There were long, bare, pink brick walls, very dull, variegated only by pointless blank portholes and plum-jam- coloured surrounds. I do not think they have improved much with time. The real beneficiary of these outer walls has been St Pancras station, whose pinnacles loom up behind them, far more romantic for the contrast.
But the grandiose courtyard that is flanked by these walls has begun to work its magic . . .
Submitted by Ryan on January 5, 2002 - 11:32pm
An editorial on this week\'s unveiling of the few Reagan era records not suppressed by the Bush administration:
Suppose they gave a document drop and nobody came? Well, that almost happened here on Thursday when the Reagan Presidential Library, operating under the heavy thumb of the White House, with some fanfare released 8,000 documents from the Reagan years to show how open they intend to be in letting historians work with the raw material of their craft.
One journalist came. An Associated Press reporter scanned the 12 boxes that constituted the \"Inventory of Restricted Materials\" released a year late, because the new Bush White House has ordered that documents will not be seen if there are objections by the current president, the former president, or their relatives and lawyers . . .
Last week\'s document drop, probably put together hastily because of the bad publicity surrounding President Bush\'s locking up of public archives, was advertised as proof that historians and scholars would be \"pleasantly surprised\" by the importance of the papers and the liberal attitudes toward truth of our current leaders.
It turned out to be a joke . . .
More via Yahoo. A more optimistic assessment is, of course, available at Fox News.