- LISWire: Two Omnium Gatherum Media Books Receive Shirley Jackson Award Nominations
- LISWire: Rocky View School District Adds Five New Libraries to Its LibLime Koha Union Catalog
- LISWire: Agreement between EBSCO Information Services and Al Manhal Adds Arabic Content to EBSCO Discovery Service™
- LISWire: Libki Support Now Available from ByWater Solutions
- LISWire: NoveList and TLC Expand Relationship to Include ILS Integration into NoveList Select


Comments
I doubt it
Whenever there is a "decency" outcry whether it be print (remember the outrage against all those trashy women novelists in the 19th century?), radio, TV or popular music, the culture almost always drifts the opposite direction of the protest. I was a teen-ager when they were hollering about Elvis on the Ed Sullivan show. Now it looks absolutely benign and sort of sweetly nostalgic with no grabbing for crabs. I can't think of any permanent damage to those of you who want to loosen things up for the good of all those who come after. Just wait--it will get worse--or better, depending on your viewpoint.
Indeceny is protected
The United States has already been down that path and the U.S. Supreme Court has already ruled on it: you cannot ban indecency, you can only regulate it to the safe harbour (22:00 - 06:00). Furthermore, indecency does have a legal definition; roughly: talk about or depictions of excretory or sexual organs. By this definition, the only things that can legally be relegated to the safe harbour, are full frontal nudity for males at all times, and for females if the mons venus is shaved and/or the labia are exposed. Breasts are not sex organs -- or they are the same way skin is, depending on your point of view. Full dorsal nudity is acceptable as long as the buttocks are not spread to expose the anus or the labia.