Libraries looking to carry the new Harry Potter book will have to follow a number of rules set out by the publisher first. Included in the Scholastic Inc. contract is the provision that libraries limit the number of staff that come into contact with the books before the release date (July 21). Libraries must also provide the names and contact information for all branch managers. Those failing to do so will risk being blocked from future releases. The contract states, “We acknowledge and agree that any such violation will cause irreparable harm to Scholastic and the author, J.K. Rowling, and that monetary damages will be inadequate to compensate for violations.”
From SFGate
- Next Evelyn Gahyan, A Berkeley Librarian Who’s Been Around the Block
- Previous Howard Hughes Biography Hoax – Movie and Book
Recent Posts
- E-Books Can Subvert Book Bans, But Corporate Profit-Seeking Stands in the Way March 10, 2024
- Ten Stories That Shaped 2023 December 15, 2023
- War Sows Disruption at the National Book Awards November 16, 2023
- “No one else is saving it”: the fight to protect a historic music collection November 16, 2023
- No, I Don’t Want to Join Your Book Club November 9, 2023
- Iowa election 2023: Pella Public Library retains independence November 9, 2023
- A door at a Swedish library was accidentally left open 446 people came in, borrowed 245 books. Every single one was returned November 9, 2023
Recent Comments
- Examining Arab and Muslim librarians in fiction – Pop Culture Library Review on Librarian Combats Muslim Stereotypes
- St. Paul libraries face moment of reckoning – LISNews – News For Librarians on Secret and mysterious libraries
- Ellie on Just How Gross Are Library Books, Exactly?
- Prodigious1one on The Teaching Librarian Versus The Teacher
- Jason on Ten Stories That Shaped 2019
- centaurea on Libraries using Internet Trust Tools
LISNews Archives
- March 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (1)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- August 2023 (22)
- February 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (20)
- December 2022 (6)
- February 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- July 2020 (11)
- June 2020 (11)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (3)
- March 2019 (11)
- February 2019 (41)
- January 2019 (31)
- December 2018 (6)
- November 2018 (11)
- October 2018 (15)
- September 2018 (9)
- August 2018 (22)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (7)
- April 2018 (8)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (17)
- January 2018 (13)
- December 2017 (8)
- November 2017 (16)
- October 2017 (18)
- September 2017 (11)
- August 2017 (8)
- July 2017 (8)
- June 2017 (21)
- May 2017 (39)
- April 2017 (22)
- March 2017 (15)
- February 2017 (21)
- January 2017 (40)
- December 2016 (20)
- November 2016 (9)
- October 2016 (20)
- September 2016 (48)
- August 2016 (48)
- July 2016 (55)
- June 2016 (61)
- May 2016 (39)
- April 2016 (67)
- March 2016 (81)
- February 2016 (85)
- January 2016 (69)
- December 2015 (90)
- November 2015 (126)
- October 2015 (107)
- September 2015 (85)
- August 2015 (42)
- July 2015 (32)
- June 2015 (35)
- May 2015 (39)
- April 2015 (14)
- March 2015 (60)
- February 2015 (75)
- January 2015 (44)
- December 2014 (30)
- November 2014 (39)
- October 2014 (43)
- September 2014 (30)
- August 2014 (36)
- July 2014 (59)
- June 2014 (46)
- May 2014 (62)
- April 2014 (58)
- March 2014 (52)
- February 2014 (37)
- January 2014 (42)
- December 2013 (41)
- November 2013 (25)
- October 2013 (43)
- September 2013 (28)
- August 2013 (32)
- July 2013 (61)
- June 2013 (51)
- May 2013 (50)
- April 2013 (52)
- March 2013 (68)
- February 2013 (62)
- January 2013 (62)
- December 2012 (53)
- November 2012 (64)
- October 2012 (111)
- September 2012 (109)
- August 2012 (128)
- July 2012 (57)
- June 2012 (75)
- May 2012 (163)
- April 2012 (158)
- March 2012 (109)
- February 2012 (125)
- January 2012 (136)
- December 2011 (109)
- November 2011 (74)
- October 2011 (82)
- September 2011 (95)
- August 2011 (106)
- July 2011 (93)
- June 2011 (102)
- May 2011 (94)
- April 2011 (105)
- March 2011 (100)
- February 2011 (92)
- January 2011 (110)
- December 2010 (124)
- November 2010 (83)
- October 2010 (118)
- September 2010 (115)
- August 2010 (110)
- July 2010 (108)
- June 2010 (113)
- May 2010 (78)
- April 2010 (121)
- March 2010 (191)
- February 2010 (182)
- January 2010 (168)
- December 2009 (129)
- November 2009 (116)
- October 2009 (131)
- September 2009 (149)
- August 2009 (162)
- July 2009 (166)
- June 2009 (189)
- May 2009 (112)
- April 2009 (164)
- March 2009 (185)
- February 2009 (151)
- January 2009 (173)
- December 2008 (200)
- November 2008 (155)
- October 2008 (252)
- September 2008 (267)
- August 2008 (193)
- July 2008 (208)
- June 2008 (161)
- May 2008 (208)
- April 2008 (253)
- March 2008 (201)
- February 2008 (246)
- January 2008 (185)
- December 2007 (200)
- November 2007 (208)
- October 2007 (241)
- September 2007 (227)
- August 2007 (269)
- July 2007 (201)
- June 2007 (205)
- May 2007 (157)
- April 2007 (217)
- March 2007 (250)
- February 2007 (183)
- January 2007 (181)
- December 2006 (163)
- November 2006 (180)
- October 2006 (170)
- September 2006 (215)
- August 2006 (210)
- July 2006 (202)
- June 2006 (257)
- May 2006 (280)
- April 2006 (271)
- March 2006 (347)
- February 2006 (284)
- January 2006 (300)
- December 2005 (267)
- November 2005 (238)
- October 2005 (364)
- September 2005 (349)
- August 2005 (377)
- July 2005 (382)
- June 2005 (403)
- May 2005 (371)
- April 2005 (420)
- March 2005 (367)
- February 2005 (368)
- January 2005 (346)
- December 2004 (311)
- November 2004 (260)
- October 2004 (308)
- September 2004 (228)
- August 2004 (319)
- July 2004 (395)
- June 2004 (338)
- May 2004 (288)
- April 2004 (364)
- March 2004 (348)
- February 2004 (438)
- January 2004 (266)
- December 2003 (222)
- November 2003 (226)
- October 2003 (281)
- September 2003 (317)
- August 2003 (315)
- July 2003 (278)
- June 2003 (282)
- May 2003 (265)
- April 2003 (271)
- March 2003 (249)
- February 2003 (283)
- January 2003 (210)
- December 2002 (186)
- November 2002 (184)
- October 2002 (222)
- September 2002 (210)
- August 2002 (207)
- July 2002 (184)
- June 2002 (166)
- May 2002 (160)
- April 2002 (195)
- March 2002 (183)
- February 2002 (195)
- January 2002 (203)
- December 2001 (203)
- November 2001 (238)
- October 2001 (183)
- September 2001 (153)
- August 2001 (204)
- July 2001 (243)
- June 2001 (176)
- May 2001 (92)
- April 2001 (116)
- March 2001 (153)
- February 2001 (142)
- January 2001 (131)
- December 2000 (110)
- November 2000 (124)
- October 2000 (128)
- September 2000 (132)
- August 2000 (138)
- July 2000 (166)
- June 2000 (135)
- May 2000 (120)
- April 2000 (121)
- March 2000 (181)
- February 2000 (163)
- January 2000 (54)
- November 1999 (37)
Refuse to sign the document
I’m familliar with the document and there was a simillar document for the previous release. Place your order but do not sign the document. We didn’t sign the document last time and still received our materials. Libraries routinely deal with materials received prior to release and most of us do a good job of handling those materials. Signing this document is something you should not do. Either they trust my library to handle materials correctly or not but I refuse to sign away my legal writes just to be able to place a book out the day it is released. If my order shows up I will not place it on the shelf early, I will have it processed and placed in my technical services managers office and it will be transferred for circulation on the day it is released. I will not create special procedures for one title nor will I have special procedures dictated to me by a vendor.
My (very rude) take on it
1: Fuck you and the horse you rode in on, you money-grubbing assholes.
2: This is the last book in the series you dipshits; what future releases?
3: I don’t see how J.K. Rowling is going to lose any profits because somebody read a copy of one her books a day early since the book will already have been paid for; ‘splain pleez.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Thanks Fang for the insightful commentary. It was very enlightening and really added to the discussion.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
It is insightful, yes, but I doubt that you understand how. The nuances in this one are so far over some people’s heads they wouldn’t hear its warp core breach and I suspect that you’re one of them.
ahem
I read it when we got it and thought it was like the legal language at the bottom of the form you sign when you get a video card. That is to say: Scary-sounding stuff that has no consequence.
Think about it. If one of your patrons or staff has people read the copies too early and they tell no one, no one finds out and no one is hurt. Scholastic could probably not care less.
But, if you have a “Read Harry Potter Early” party where you read it and then call the local newspaper and tv news and reveal all the secrets, details and the ending … well then I can see the harm to Scholastic. That’s probably what they are concerned with.
I just don’t think it’s a big deal.
And Fang? Man, you gotta lighten up, homes.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Last book, Scholastic did the same thing. Also for the last book, some terribly mean and horrible person scanned the page where Dumbledore dies and spammed it to a livejournal harry potter community- ruining the experience for readers. However, when I read “future releases” I was like what future releases?
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Getting over on livejournal Potterites should be grounds for canonization.
Re:ahem
This legalistic nonsense is so much mumbo-jumbo bullshit signifying nothing. You said as much yourself. I just said it in a more blunt fashion using good old Anglo-Saxon Basic. Why? Because shit like that just pisses me off. This is not even a marketing ploy.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
>>they wouldn’t hear its warp core breach
Wow! Star Trek references!! You are cool! I am so unworthy to comment on your nuanced analysis.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Tey are just protecting their rights. Do you realy care?
Future releases mean by the author or other authors, not just this particular series.
It is not the reading of the book that will cause loss of profits, it is the piratization or sharing of materials that can cause loss of profits.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Pardon the typo. Tey is they.
Just don’t order it until after the go live date
So just don’t order the book until it is released. So the three thousand patrons don’t get to read it for three days after it comes out, BFD.
Sign the thing and play by the rules, or wait a few days.
Personally I think it is complete nonsense, although I have not read it (I would like to if anyone wants to post or send me a copy). It seems fine to me though, either abide by the conditions of the contract or don’t enter into the contract.
When I worked at the PL we got them from B&T not Scholastic. B&T noted the street date, but we didn’t have to agree to anything outside our regular contract with them.
I do agree with Fang, it is marketing hype. They really don’t give a damn unless you photocopy the thing and start giving them away or circulate it before the street date. Are they going to have armored cars deliver the things to bookstores? Please be realistic they will get them days before the street date too.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
I do not see this as “just” protecting their rights. This is threats and intimidation on the a priori assumption that every book vendor and lender is going to rip them off. All that is necessary is a simple letter asking those who will receive shipments to ensure that no copy of the book is made available before the release date. This crap is an unwarranted overreaction.
Re:My (very rude) take on it 🙂
I remember when the last book came out, some website was selling t-shirts that said “DUMBLEDORE DIES ON PAGE 596 (I JUST SAVED YOU 4 HOURS AND $30)”. I always wanted to get it.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Gaaaaaaah!
Spoiler Space Please!
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Sorry, I assumed that since that book was a few years old everyone already new what happened.
Re:My (very rude) take on it
Gack…new=knew.
Spoiler .50 at yard sales. That book has a huge print-run, so I’ve no doubt I can score a good copy for cheap.
Yeah, I haven’t gotten it yet. I’m still several books behind, I’m gonna snap them up when I can pick them up for like
However, count me in for that spoiler. I really want to find the LJ icon which says that, as well.
— Ender, Duke_of_URL