Finding Censorship Where There Is None


WSJ:'To you zealots and bigots and false patriots who live in fear of discourse. You screamers and banners and burners. . . ." These are the opening lines of the official Manifesto of Banned Books Week, which starts tomorrow. This annual "national celebration of the freedom to read" is led by the American Library Association (ALA) and co-sponsored by a number of professional associations and advocacy groups. Events and displays at "hundreds" of libraries and bookstores will "draw attention to the problem of censorship" in the U.S.

As the tone of the Manifesto suggests, the sponsors are more interested in confrontation than celebration. The Banned Books Week Readout in Chicago will feature "wildly successful" and "incredibly popular" authors who will "share their experiences as targets of censors." The American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression has produced posters, based on a graphic-novel adaptation of "Fahrenheit 451," to help "publicize the hundreds of attacks on books that occur every year in the United States." The ALA has launched an online U.S. "censorship map" to show how pervasive the threat is.

In the common-law tradition, censorship refers specifically to the government's prior restraint on publication. None of the sponsors claim this has happened; the acts they have in mind are perpetrated by private citizens. Yet the cases on the map almost all involve ordinary people lodging complaints with school and library authorities. Before Banned Books Week began in 1982, such behavior was known as petitioning the government for a redress of grievances.

Read the full opinion piece at the Wall Street Journal.


I get what your saying here, but when those petitions result in action - such as a school board (a government body of sorts) banning a book in that district (which happened in our fairly liberal town just last year until an extensive letter writing campaign highly publicized the event).

I think its important to recognize that that the voice of the very few often dictates policy for the rest. The level of oppression doesn't differ if those very few are embodied by a King or a vocal group of private citizens petitioning for a redress of grievances causing the oppressive act.

Subscribe to Comments for "Finding Censorship Where There Is None"