Bunny Suicides book - an interesting turn of events

Upon discovering a book depicting rabbit ending their lives in a number of unusual ways, a woman in Oregon checked the book out of the library, refused to return it, and threatened to burn it and any other copies that were purchased to replace the copy she stole. After a time though, and a good deal of community outrage, she did return the book and claimed that her threats were fueled by emotion and distorted by the media and they should be dismissed as such.

This even brings up a couple of interesting issues; information access denial by patron action and the reaction of the community to such action. I find it quite interesting that a community, many of whom stated that they did not care for the book, felt that it still should be included in the library holdings, and some even sent funds with which to procure another copy. Given the circumstances, I have to wonder if the woman in question would not have come forth with the book, or have carried out her threats to destroy that which she felt objectionable has the media not picked up on the story.

How common is it for this sort of action to take place? Given the regularity with which these sorts of stories make the news it seems to be a fairly regular occurrence. According to the ALA, more than a book a day is challenged in the United States.

Further Reading:

One of the original news stories may be accessed here and the follow up article may be found here.

The original book is available through standard online booksellers and a sequel to the book is also available, although no word yet on whether it has created the same level of controversy as the original book.

Online examples may be seen here for those interested in the actual content.

Taxonomy upgrade extras: 
Subscribe to Comments for "Bunny Suicides book - an interesting turn of events"