Get LISNews via email! Enter Your Email Address:
You may have heard of Bjorn Lomberg, the Danish statistician and director of Denmark's national Environmental Assessment Institute. He wrote a highly controversial book The Skeptical Environmentalist, in which he questioned much of the "scientific consensus" concerning global warming. He was accused by the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD) of--you guessed it--scientific dishonesty (his book was deemed "objectively dishonest" or "clearly contrary to the standards of good scientific practice").
However, the Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation completely rejected the DCSD report, saying that it lacked documentation and was "completely void of argumentation" for their charges of scientific dishonesty. In rejecting the report, the Ministry left it up to the DCSD to decide whether or not to reopen the case, or to dismiss the charges.
After a two-year investigation, the Committee on Scientific Dishonesty has dismissed the charges.
In a way, I like working Saturdays. It's busy, but it's a spread out busy, not a "the library is full of bored kids from 2-5:30" busy. However, you run into the same problem you run into on Fridays in that when the children's room closes at five, you get a wave of bored children coming downstairs.
This will get me death threats I'm sure: I'm not a big fan of kids. I mean, some kids are fine, but I choose not to have them myself. I'm not overly fond of the neighbor's kids. I don't like to go to restaurants have a cranky six year old screaming in my ear (a cranky one year old I have a higher tolerance level of. I can understand that. It's age appropriate.)
But my distaste for children isn't particularly why I don't want them downstairs. They bang on keyboards, sure, and sometimes, when they get real bored, they whip all the paperbacks off the shelves. That's annoying. That ticks me off.
But I worry about my responsibility to them. I can't babysit them. I mean, technically the poor children's librarians shouldn't be doing that either (though I know they are). But at least they were hired to specifically deal with the children. I was hired for all ages, but primarily above twelve. Usually, from five to six, I am helping people over twelve. I can't be watching a five year old left by mom and dad. Or by their "very mature and responsible" eight year old brother (happens-- a lot.)
I wish the library were a safer place, at least, as safe as parents seem to think it is. I wish that I could throw these children out when they're really misbehaving (as they sometimes do), without guilt that I now have a six year old wandering the streets. But I can't in good conscience do that. I'm not a big fan of children -- but I care enough not to put them in harm's way.
Which I think, sometimes, is more than some parents do.
Okay... comment away. I know librarians as babysitters is not a new phenomenon and in many ways I am preaching to the choir. And I know that my not too fond of children stance ticks many off... Go easy on me. I'm fragile.
On the political front: I threw a fit of journal-entry proportions this morning because a friend and I went to the ghetto Safeway and discovered limes cost 50 cents apiece there.
Iâ€™m convinced the pricing of the limes has more to do with the fact that most folks who shop the ghetto Safeway do not own cars -- or enjoy a straight shot on mass transit to the competition -- because you can get limes five for a dollar elsewhere if you have a car; I purchased about 50 limes a week ago for 20 cents apiece.
(And, yes, I'm aware that someone has to labor for less than nothing and no hope for the occasional trip to the salon to get me limes at that price; jump to the wrap at the end if that's your shtick.)
My argument is that the pricing has nothing to do with fluctuations in the wholesale lime market, that we could have hit another Safeway served by the same warehouse and found limes five for a dollar.
The friend disagreed and is (begin emphasis) still (end emphasis) actively disagreeing. (Continuous action in the present, he.)
He says â€œthey would get busted if they did that.â€? He says every Safeway served by the same warehouse has limes for 50 cents apiece right now.
Hello? Who is going to bust Safeway for pricing limes based on what X captive market is willing to pay?
The larger argument: Fordist urban planning is a barrier to folks getting the lime-pricing they deserve. (I caved and bought a few of the 50-cent limes. They were underperformers.)
If we had great mass transit and sensible urban planning, not only would uniform pricing of limes result from everyone having equal access to all retailers, but Walmart would not be No. 1 in all significant retail categories -- folks would not necessarily patronize a retailer based on the asphalt-availability index alone.
My two neighbors, both under 30, do not have cars, and they report -- this while drinking wine on the balcony beginning at 10 or so on a Friday morning -- that it would not matter to them if they could get 50 rolls of toilet paper for 50 cents or 20 limes for $1, they would not patronize Walmart or its subsidiaries.
The one 23-year-old and said voting with your consumer dollar is equally as important as voting in elections.
If you think the larger argument is that you'd have to stop buying much of anything if you really wanted to stay clean karma-wise, this is the wrap: Yes, in a perfect world you'd have to pay the lime workers a livable wage and pass the non-savings onto me. But that goes against the Walmart worldview and would require a sustainable economy -- on and on.
Perhaps someone is tempted to imagine (or even assert) that I suggested the story about the EU's attempts to protect children while they use the Internet to make an argument for filtering along these lines:
Perhaps there is no such Someone, but if there is, that someone would of course be wrong.
For one thing, the EU does not rank high on my list of folks I would trust to make decisions on what my child should and shouldn't see on the Internet, or elsewhere. For another, I regard Internet filtering as problematic because it puts the state in loco parentis, and as I've said elsewhere, I don't want the state there. (Note that I'm not asserting that this is a decisive argument against filtering, but it's one that all parents who believe themselves responsible for their children's education should consider very thoroughly.)
I suggested this story firstly because I know that LISNews readers are interested in questions of filtering and censorship. Secondly, the list of people who think they are entitled to decide what others should read and see is by no means limited to religious extremists and malodorous drippy-nosed perverts (as some define them). In fact, I hope to post several more stories EU and UN attempts to regulate Internet content and use. LISNnewsters will, I think, find them of interest.
Serves me right. I am nice. Even though the guy didn't watch his class last time; when he buzzes up, I say sure. The gym was being used for Senior cap and gown pictures, and he needed somewhere to take his kids. For a second time, he sat in the large conference room (now the police officer's office) with his feet propped up. I will say no next time ...
It is a GORGEOUS day outside. I am taking a personal day next Friday and am hoping it looks like this one. Thank goodness the daycare center my son is in takes the infants outside.
I purchased Core Collection for Young Adults. Then, I spent a few days going through the sixty some odd page Word document deleting titles we had or I didn't want. Now, I am going through Titlewave typing everything in. These are, obviously, wish lists that I will draw from depending on the kind of budget I get.
It is amazing that even though we are staying late to make up work time, I am not really getting any work done. The time is slated for SACS, and since I am the head of a committee, I really need to work on SACS. Well, with phone calls and not being able to talk to people (because they were busy), I didn't get a durn thing done. Maybe next Thursday. :P
I love our closed stacks.
I wasn't so sure about them at first. I mean, it's scary back there. The floor is glass and very sci-fi. This scary glow comes up when the lights are on on the floor below. The lights are just exposed bulbs. Some floor panels on the sides are pieces of plywood that look like they might not hold some of the kids that come in for story time, never mind me.
Plus the ghost. Alledgedly there is a ghost in the closed stacks. I don't know where I stand on the paranormal issue, but I guess if I were a dead bibliophile, that's probably where I'd hang out. And it certainly makes you want to believe, being in there at night.
But the books are beautiful. I love old books (this is where we keep things that don't circulate, can't circulate, or are otherwise not really needed in the main library), even though I understand that most of them have really minimal value, relatively speaking. I found a book on Dorothea Dix from the late 1800s. It wasn't anything special, but it was just neat.
Actually, know what I like? I like the really neat librarian handwriting that goes on the bookplate. And the cataloging information. The script is just gorgeous.
Library geek journal entry. We will return to our regularly scheduled systems/reference/duties as assigned posting tomorrow.
[Gibson's] only on-screen performance was of his arm and hand hammering the nail through Christâ€™s hand. In one small dramatic act, Gibson exposed Abraham Foxmanâ€™s and the Anti-Defamation Leagueâ€™s efforts to defame the biblical account of Christâ€™s death as anti-Semitic.
Gibson was saying, loud and clear, that he helped crucify his Lord and Savior.
So did I. I plead guilty and throw myself on the mercy of the court.
Of course, as we all know, the film was excessively, grossly violent:
Liberal critics of the movie were aghast at the violence portrayed in it. Well, we finally find a movie that is too violent for these critics. Not Kill Bill, which liberals celebrated as a hip and edgy film, but The Passion. Violence is too much for them if it is in service to a religious message they simply cannot stand. [emphasis mine]
If someone like Rob Reiner made this criticism, it would at least have integrity. As I understand it, Reiner has for some time been critical of the film industry for its gratuitous use of violence and sex. But, to the extent it came from folks who loved Kill Bill or Pulp Fiction, it is hypocrisy.
I hope I get to see it in a theater. Truth is, I don't get around much anymore.
 I have to confess a soft spot for Reiner, since he gave us Spinal Tap and The Princess Bride.
John Whitehead has a new article up at Razormouth. In it, he worries about the too-uncritical embrace of politics by Christians. The whole article is worth reading, especially for Christians. I offer two representative quotes:
The religious fervor of the gladiator salute â€œHail, Caesar!â€? finds its counterpart in todayâ€™s political scene. Candidates in modern election campaigns present themselves as heroes whose election will mark the advent of a new society. More and more, even in the United States, they claim that the state will provide all the answers to our woes. (Consider the present administrationâ€™s assertion that the government can now heal our marriages, cure our health problems and take care of us from cradle to grave, as well as save us from terrorists.)
As Professor Alan Johnson once wrote: â€œA Christianity tied too closely to the civil authorities soon finds itself being used as a tool to sanction the particular policies and acts of a government which uses the church to win citizen approval.â€? In other words, believers must avoid becoming merged with the state or politics, or else they risk becoming partners in the governmentâ€™s ultimate goals.
Fang-Face, if you are reading this, would you please contact Whitehead somehow and let him know what an authoritarian religious extremist and drippy-nosed malodorous pervert he is. I'm so incensed, I can't bring myself to do it.
He concludes his article with the acquiescence of the German church to the Nazi regime prior to the Second World War. While I find his comparison of Nazi Germany to our present situation rather over-the-top, not to say krankhaft (pardon the pun), as long as he is bringing it up it is an example we should bear in mind. Fortunately, our constitution is a good deal stronger than that of the Weimar Republic, and our economic woes ain't got nothin' on the Germany of the 20's and 30's. Still, we dare not cease our vigilance, whether or not we support the Patriot Act.
I could use a change of pace from the heavy topics I've been writing about and so can you.
Check out the Aurora Web Cam. This camera was set up by a private individual in Fairbanks, Alaska.
The camera is live at night (at least until May, when there's too much light) so you can tune and see whether there are northern lights playing. The builder of this site has also put together some terrific videos that are ALMOST as good as actually sitting out under the stars. Of course, if you live south of Seattle, this may be the only taste of the northern lights you get.
Even on the 'net, the aurora is worth watching. The dance of the lights is mesmerizing! Definitely best with a broadband connection, but 56K isn't totally disappointing.
Or, today's version, IBM 300GL, come forth. Today, just for the hell of it, I switched video cards. One from the work room computer (which was dead) into my dead computer. Lo and behold, then they both booted and worked fine. I can not pretend to understand. I made no pretenses that I really understood what exactly went on. I fully expect both of them to stop working if I look at them cross eyed or insult their mothers. But for now, we are once again running with computers where they really need to be. Happily ever after. Amen.
Perhaps it was my computer's three hour visit to the basement computer morgue that scared the bejeebies out of it and got it working again.
Amazing how people will fight over overdue fines. This is over an amount of money I'm sure they don't even notice they're spending at Dunkin Donuts in the morning. But that pays our messengers. It's not like we're salting it away to close the library to go to Tahiti.
If you ask me, libraries without messengers are really bummers. I wish I could have been a messenger as a kid. I find shelving books relaxing. I tend to drop books a lot though. Clumsy me.
I spotted two teenagers in the lower stacks reading. They were being good, but I asked them to go up to young adult. It's kind of dark and skeevy in the lower stacks, and I didn't want them down there alone. I don't like to be down there alone.
Caught a kid last night beating on one of my keyboards playing online games, which is prohibited. I am mighty protective of keyboards and mice. They're like pet hamsters, with their short life spans and their funny odor. Okay, well, at least with their short lifespans.
Priceless things from this current vacation period:1. Not getting attacked by colleagues on their own initiative and without provocation from me for being a Christian 2. Seemingly every librarian at the Fairview Park Regional library outside Cleveland's west side saying hello and apparently recognizing that I must be a librarian-in-training or something3. Finding the pleasure and humor of books by Will Manley4. Getting to spend time with my family
Thanks for all the kind feedback I got last week. I can't begin to tell you how nice that was.
I've noticed a couple "why is this on LISNews" comments for the first time lately. For years the LISNews about page said:
"You are stuck with what we find interesting on any given day, if that happens to interest you, then today is your lucky day." And I always wanted the rest to say: "If not, then tough shit, you're not paying for it."
I can't remember exactly why I took that line out. I guess it just never felt quite right being there, but I still think it sums up nicely what we do here. For the most part LISNews works like this:
Someone has an interest in becoming an author at LISNews.
They contact me, I give them super secret and exciting author powers.
They find a link, story, site, or something they find interesting.
They login, and post it to LISNews.
I've always worked hard at keeping LISNews as open as possible, without going completely metafilter, because I believe that having more people involved with the site makes it more useful/interesting/informative/exciting/etcâ€¦ Lately, the number of authors, coupled with my time off, has meant there's been a noticeable change in what gets posted. I've posted the majority of the stories over the past 4 years, which means, by default, I controlled much of what was seen around here. That's not really something I ever wanted, you know I've been begging for more authors since day one. I've been begging for more participation in general since day one. I'm trying to avoid the echo chamber, and I think we do a pretty decent job most of the time.
So, to answer your question, that is on LISNews because someone thought it was interesting. It's there because we want it there, because you might learn something, and because we decide what to post. Your feedback is always welcome, but we do this because it's fun, and because we find it interesting. We don't need to worry about ratings, or readership, or offending people.
I'll need another week or so to get the new server finished up, and all the domains moved over. LISNews is going to go last this time, because LISNews is going to be such a huge pain to move I don't even want to think about it until I have to. Keep your eyes on LISNews.org. That's where I'll be testing the new code before I dump all our old data in. You can expect some serious down time and general messiness at LISNews for a while as I make the transition.
I always tense up when I walk through a security gate. Not the ones at the airport: I assume that I'm going to set those off, the ones at the library. Even if I'm not carrying any library (or Blockbuster) material. I just tense up. And of course, yesterday I set the alarm off. Not because I was trying to leave with unchecked items (although I have been known to do that), but because I was leaving work with a public library book. The PL never desensitizes anything, since there aren't any security gates at my branch, even though there are downtown.
And, to add injury to insult, our gates don't just make noise, they lock a swinging turnstile. So, instead of swinging out of the way, it hit me. At "waist" height.
I wonder if I can claim workers' compensation.
IBM computers suck. Am I allowed to say that? More specifically, the IBM computers we got suck. Mine is officially gone to computer heaven (or hell, I'm not sure). Last night I got the word from one of our support staff that, yes, the one in the workroom also seems to have gone. Special collections survived (it wasn't on at the time of the power outtage), as did two librarian's computers (which, now that I think about it, were also not on at the time of the outtage.) I guess I should be thankful for small things, like that those two particular librarians came in late that day.
It all comes down to no money. Not only no hardware money, but no money. Time for a bake sale. To patch the problem, I get the extra cataloging computer in tech services, and either special collections or the workroom goes without.
My desk right now is the computer ER. I have one computer open that doesn't need to be (I just haven't had time to play with the old clamshell case to get the damn thing to shut nicely) and of course my old computer, which is dead. I guess I scavenge for transplantation parts and take it to the computer morgue (the basement) at some point this week. Eventually I will get my desk back.
I was weeding computer books, and I discovered one book on KERMIT that had a 5 1/4" floppy in it. Yes, I withdrew it.
I went down the lower level, where we keep the 005s, and I discovered two young people having a very intense conversation. I guess they were down there because they didn't want anyone to hear, because as soon as they heard me coming with the cart they shut up and went upstairs.
Our one book on the history of the ballpoint pen has been withdrawn. Too bad, it would have come in handy for a school project someone was working on yesterday. Why they're teaching useful things like ball point pen history and not, like, how to use a library, I don't know.
I was told by a nice young lady that the weather encyclopedia I got for the library to help with the massive amount of meterological requests we get was "too much reading." Sigh.
It's actually quite a nice set... It's from the Gale Group, and is therefore at a USA Today reading level. Perhaps a little higher, just due to the general nature of it. Nice set though. She didn't like it, but I was quite pleased with it.
Hi. I am guessing nobody cares what I write in here but I figured I would write something. I am here because my boyfriend writes stuff here! He is such a goofy cutie. So hi Mr. Man! That's it for today!
I guess it is my own fault for wanting to run on the bleedin' edge. So I go back to the install floppies and successfully reinstall debian, only this time the dang thing decides not prompt me if I'd rather run a static IP address or one from DHCP. You'd think that debian installers would consider that this might be a server machine, but nooooooo. Running the install in Expert mode proved futile (where the installer actually prompts for this), but for whatever reason expert mode would not install any kernel the installer chose. So how did I get around this blasted anomoly? Yank out the network wire during the dhcp detection phase. Woohoo, I get the prompts for a static IP Address.
So, because I'm running unstable, instead of running head-long into piling on the packages after install, I meticulously pick and install each package one-by-one until I finally get down to request tracker. Slowly I add apache. Then Perl. Then apache-perl. then libapache-mod-perl. At least "apt-get" includes all the little bonus packages that are needed to run these apps. Can't get away from running OpenBSD's SSH protocol, gottah run putty off my XP desktop. Last but not least, Request Tracker. gunzip the doc install file for debian, setup the mysql user for the tables and run the debian install init script.
Strange, Request tracker doesn't want to run from apache-perl. Directory not found keeps poppin up in the browser. libhtml-mason-perl wanted the normal apache anyhoo, so lets try that. Bingo! Request Tracker login. Images ain't loading, but all I need is a symlink and it'll be fixed.
Now only if this headache between XP's built-in active-directory dns-client would quit complaining about my ISC Bind9 + Dynamic updat'ng DHCPD v3, my stupid computer would find more hosts. Could the bug exist in my auto-proxy configuration script? Why not just disable the dang service in Windows XP you ask? I would if I wasn't upgrading the local lan here to Windows Server 2003 and Active Directory...
In last week's Newsweek, Anna Quindlen wrote what I thought was a good, tho not perfect column on the American right's efforts to claim sole ownership of Christianity. While I don't have a link to Newsweek, her syndicated column can be read at GoErie.com.
Quindlen distinguishes faith from religiosity, which leads people to close e-mails with "he was not only going to mention God, he was going to capitalize the G because he knew it made liberals like me crazy."
Along the way, she dispenses with the so-called "worship gap" poll from the Pew Research Center For The People & The Press that made the rounds in the press last fall. I couldn't find the exact poll on the Internet, but there is an article from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life that mirrors Quindlen's assertions.
I think both columns are worth a read. It rings with my experience. Some of the most liberal people I know are people of deep Christian faith and some of the most conservative people I know are simple deists, which is only a step from atheism. I've also known conservative Christians and liberal atheists.
By the way, although I think Quindlen's article is worth reading, I AM NOT intending to attack anyone's (LISNewster's) faith here or accuse them of simple "religiosity." I do think that most of what passes for "faith in Christ" in our political life IS simple religiosity. I think that's dangerous and poisonious to true Christian faith. As Mel Gibson once said, "The number one cause of athesism today is Christians."
The more I think about it, the more I am acutely aware we're one computer in the hole now that mine is on the blink... Honestly, I don't hold out much hope of it coming back, unless it obviously tripped a switch somewhere. I think something may have sizzled. And the assistant director was right, giving someone something means never taking it away. I gave our spare computer to the workroom, and there's no getting it back. So my computer gets swapped with special collections, and special collections goes without. Budget cuts suck. Suck suck suck.
So I'm looking at computers, although I don't hold out much hope either way, and I think we'll be limping along until at least June. Here's hoping that nothing poops out in the meantime.
I am just so glad my iPaq wasn't hooked up at the time. Jeez oh man.
So today I get the unfinished business of yesterday, mainly emailing the lady telling her I couldn't find the obit of the person in question (I went over and above looking, too) but I'll see what I could do for her on the directories. I honestly don't see how the directories are going to help her, but hey. I also get to give one patron mixed news about her lost book. This should be interesting. I do expect a fight.
I wonder if the gentleman who threatened to call the mayor on me will be in today. I'd be interested to meet him.
I zorched the hard drive on the previously unfiltered terminal, and intend on putting it out on the floor either today or tomorrow. Zorching was the only way I could be sure to get all the crud that was downloaded (spyware, adware, and otherwise) off the hard drive on that baby. In order to simplify things when Timed Access comes, I decided to make that box Windows (boo!). My email terminals will be Linux (yay!). I could try to set up printing on it now, but I'm feeling lazy. I'll get around to it. I know it can be done.
Problem with the Windows box is I can't get the antivirus to activate. I might try uninstalling and reinstalling, while I set up the special collections computer on my desk.
I awoke with a whopper of a headache. It smacks of an oncoming migraine (I get those on occasion). I would call in today to nip it in the bud, but after the day I had yesterday I don't want them to think I'm quitting or avoiding anything. (Can you tell I'm horribly driven by what other people think?) No, I just hate using sick time. I like to see all those hours on my pay stub.
If I can just put it off till Friday... well, a migraine on my day off would be in keeping with the week, I guess.
The Prius will cost about $400 and take three days to fix (boo!) but the other lady's insurance will pay for it (yay!) and they don't think there's been any damage to the foam under the bumper (yay!). If there is, it'll cost more (boo!). On the plus side, it's just a buff and paint and reseal and coat sort of deal, not a whole new bumper sort of deal, which would have stunk.
Today was one of those days I had to repeatedly wash the "bullseye" off my forehead.
I cut myself on the Compaq. Not badly, but enough to discover my hand covered in blood when I was covering info. Then the alarm company decided to test our fire alarms -- all day, I might add. Then some very nice man called, said he didn't feel well, and that because of this he wanted me to waive his late fines. I told him I couldn't if it was just a minor illness. Had he been calling from the hospital, sure. He could have renewed them, if he hadn't had them out the maximum number of times. I talked to him for twenty minutes, consisting, in a nutshell of him saying, "Pleeeeeeeeeeaase? Why not?" and me saying, "No. No, really, no."
Horizon went down. The power went out, which seemingly, um, fried my computer. No hard drive noises. No A drive noises. No POST beeps. The light goes on, but that's about it.
The woman in the balcony was on the phone. She turned it off when I asked. An hour later she was on it again.
I was told we sent out a flyer with misinformation (we never sent it). I was also told (very helpful information alert!) that the obituary isn't always run in the paper the day the person dies. Thanks. They don't teach you stuff like that in common sense-- I mean, library school. Of course, because I am too nice, I went to local history to look up this information, and the information just doesn't exist. At least, not in our collection.
Stolen cards, one legitimately so, one probably not legitimately so. Misplaced books, which turned out to be damaged books, taped together. The serendipity of it was that I was searching for a damaged book that a gentleman had a gripe with, and though I never found his book, I did find a book that another patron thought was missing.
People erasing other people's names on the internet sign up sheets.
On the up side: I helped a young lady and her mom find books on the 1840s. They thanked me and said, "This is the first time I could find something at this library!"
How I needed to hear that today.
Waiting for my ??? install to complete. I don't remember how many times I've done this in the last two days. If I hadn't barfed the apache/perl install to get Request Tracker working here in the Library I wouldn't be wasting this much time. At least the proxy server I set up is caching some of the packages I've been downloading, downloading again, and again....
I see debian unstable has graduated to 2.6.x series kernel. Too bad it refused to install when I chose it. Grrr. OpenBSD is much simpler, too bad Request Tracker doesn't want install withing the chroot env apache. Bah, I'll blame it on this Compaq...